On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Chris Davies wrote:
> Poison Bit wrote:
>> Why filter to those in /etc/shells ? I mean... the filter should be
>> applied by the system :)
>
> Mainly because it's a convenient list of "real" shells, and some of the
> remote
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Chris Davies
wrote:
> Davit Avsharyan wrote:
>> 1/ I'm wondering why most of the system users have valid shells by
>> default ?
>> /cat /etc/passwd | grep -E '(sh|bash)' | wc -l
>> *21*/
>
> That's not necessarily sufficient to determine valid shells: the absenc
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 7:48 AM, Davit Avsharyan wrote:
> I know how to change it :). I just wanted to understand why it comes with
> 755 and not 700 ?
> Few years ago, if I'm not mistaken, everything was 700.
No less than 9 years.
In 2003 I see the 755:
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/add
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 4:51 PM, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Thu, December 29, 2011 16:37, Nicolas Carusso wrote:
>>
>> How about creating a Referense list with all the suggestions that we are
>> doing?
>> If all of you agree, Let's start now.
>>
>> SECURITY LIST
>> **
>
> There's
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 8:26 PM, 4k3nd0 <4k3...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> This is a major issue about Debian anyway.
>
> A good reason why i choose Debian instead to other distribution is simply,
> that the software is good tested and stable. That is what matters. System to
> maintain getting even h
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 12:40 AM, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 12:33:39AM +0200, Poison Bit wrote:
>> In my experience: if a company does not perform operative system
>> upgrades, the company does not have more than 5 years and does not
>> understand ho
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 12:33 AM, Poison Bit wrote:
> In my experience: if a company does not perform operative system
> upgrades, the company does not have more than 5 years and does not
> understand how open source, and in special linux kernel, works.
Or has management issues, b
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 09:15:18PM +0100, Bart Swedrowski wrote:
>> I have been "forced" to use switch from Debian to RedHat and clones
>> in my last job specifically because usual life time of a server was
>> 3.5 - 4 years.
>
> Same here. I
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 10:45 PM, wrote:
> Yes. Are you considering Total Cost of Ownership, comparing to the option of
> LTS?
>
> Best regards.
So Debian should have rolling releases, LTS with that name, and
network manager by default, and as there are no bugs to work on, and
Debian as upstream
9 matches
Mail list logo
