On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 01:08:07PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Traditionally Debian security advisories have included MD5 check sums
> of the updated packages.
> Since apt cryptographically enforces the integrity of the archive
> for quite some time now, we've decided to finally drop the h
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 01:20:25AM +0700, sthu.d...@gmail.com wrote:
> Thank You for Your reply:
>> Otherwise, you can `apt-get remove` them (plus --purge if you want
>> to reset your configuration files) and re-install them : that way
>> you'll use the main-repo version and you won't want have se
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 06:09:54AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * martin:
>> I have built a local DNS server bind (Debian Sarge).The DNS should
>> accelerate DNS look ups by LAN clients. But Now, in contrary the
>> local dns is slower than a custom DNS by my webhoster :-(
> You should use BIND
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 10:22:22AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> --
> Debian Security Advisory DSA 1027-1[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.debian.org/security/ Steve Kemp
> Apri
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 03:33:21PM -0300, Luciano Bello wrote:
> I just want to know what happened with the CVE-2005-3573[1],
> particularly in stable/sarge.
We (mailman Debian package maintainers) haven't heard back from the
security team.
--
Lionel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 03:29:48PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 12:25:50PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>
> > I've noticed that an issue I have fixed in Mailman in sid has been
> > issued a CVE and that Mandrake has issued a securi
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 12:25:50PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> I've noticed that an issue I have fixed in Mailman in sid has been
> issued a CVE and that Mandrake has issued a security advisory over
> it.
The Mandrake security advisory also covers another DoS that'
ow
+
+ * Don't fall apart if the filename of an attachment is an invalid UTF-8
+string, which leads to a DoS attack (closes: #339095)
+This is CVE-2005-3573
+
+ -- Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 14 Dec 2005 12:13:45 +0100
+
mailman (2.1.5-8) unstable; urgency=low
On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 02:40:52PM -0500, Simon Raven / Eric S. Côté wrote:
> 2.4.28
> http://www.grsecurity.net/linux-2.4.28-secfix-200501071141.patch
Is huge, touches many areas. Didn't apply cleanly to a pristine
2.4.28. The LKML gives
http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.4/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 11:20:28PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> Quoting Florian Weimer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>> Just out of curiosity, are there now, or have there been in the
>> past, any _other_ implementations of the OpenPGP spec, besides
>> GnuPG?
> GnuPG is not a complete implementation of
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 12:37:03AM +0100, David J. M. Karlsen wrote:
> I want to include crypto-patches from kerneli.org as well and these
> patches seem to clash with the freeswan ones.
The latest freeswan patches include the CryptoAPI stuff.
--
Lionel
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 12:37:03AM +0100, David J. M. Karlsen wrote:
> I want to include crypto-patches from kerneli.org as well and these
> patches seem to clash with the freeswan ones.
The latest freeswan patches include the CryptoAPI stuff.
--
Lionel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 12:47:24PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 11:04:46AM +0100, Richard van den Berg wrote:
>> security.debian.org
>> Is it possible to set up a mirror somewhere for the time being?
> ftp://download.xs4all.nl/pub/debian-securi
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 11:04:46AM +0100, Richard van den Berg wrote:
> security.debian.org
> Is it possible to set up a mirror somewhere for the time being?
ftp://download.xs4all.nl/pub/debian-security/
is a mirror, too. The question still remains on what will happen for
*future* security rele
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 12:47:24PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 11:04:46AM +0100, Richard van den Berg wrote:
>> security.debian.org
>> Is it possible to set up a mirror somewhere for the time being?
> ftp://download.xs4all.nl/pub/debian-securi
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 11:04:46AM +0100, Richard van den Berg wrote:
> security.debian.org
> Is it possible to set up a mirror somewhere for the time being?
ftp://download.xs4all.nl/pub/debian-security/
is a mirror, too. The question still remains on what will happen for
*future* security rele
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 07:32:56PM +0100, Andrea Frigido wrote:
> OK, now I install kernel-patch-freeswan-ext package, thanks :)
> It is compatible with kernel 2.4.18 or I need to use the kernel 2.4.19?
I don't know, but I guess it is. If you find out, let us know.
--
Lionel
pgp9Z6KhYHk10.pgp
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 07:17:31PM +0100, Andrea Frigido wrote:
> Alle 19:07, lunedì 18 novembre 2002, Lionel Elie Mamane ha scritto:
>> On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 07:02:59PM +0100, Andrea Frigido wrote:
>>> kernel-patch-freeswan-ext UNSTABLE package or kernel-patch-freeswan
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 07:02:59PM +0100, Andrea Frigido wrote:
> Alle 13:02, giovedì 14 novembre 2002, Lionel Elie Mamane ha scritto:
>> On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 12:43:48PM +0100, Iñaki Martínez wrote:
>> While using a free OS is always better, you can use any other IPSEC
>>
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 07:32:56PM +0100, Andrea Frigido wrote:
> OK, now I install kernel-patch-freeswan-ext package, thanks :)
> It is compatible with kernel 2.4.18 or I need to use the kernel 2.4.19?
I don't know, but I guess it is. If you find out, let us know.
--
Lionel
msg07813/pgp0
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 07:17:31PM +0100, Andrea Frigido wrote:
> Alle 19:07, lunedì 18 novembre 2002, Lionel Elie Mamane ha scritto:
>> On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 07:02:59PM +0100, Andrea Frigido wrote:
>>> kernel-patch-freeswan-ext UNSTABLE package or kernel-patch-freeswan
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 07:02:59PM +0100, Andrea Frigido wrote:
> Alle 13:02, giovedì 14 novembre 2002, Lionel Elie Mamane ha scritto:
>> On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 12:43:48PM +0100, Iñaki Martínez wrote:
>> While using a free OS is always better, you can use any other IPSEC
>>
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 12:43:48PM +0100, Iñaki Martínez wrote:
> I must create a VPN between an external company and a server behind my
> firewall.
> Company--->its_routermy_firewall<-server
> * How to implement this VPN???
I would use IPSEC, but there are other solutio
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 12:43:48PM +0100, Iñaki Martínez wrote:
> I must create a VPN between an external company and a server behind my
> firewall.
> Company--->its_routermy_firewall<-server
> * How to implement this VPN???
I would use IPSEC, but there are other solutio
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 08:15:58PM +0100, Lupe Christoph wrote:
> Is Debian affected?
I checked a few hours ago, and it was not, at least the mirror I'm
using.
--
Lionel
pgpRBCwvNmdOx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 08:15:58PM +0100, Lupe Christoph wrote:
> Is Debian affected?
I checked a few hours ago, and it was not, at least the mirror I'm
using.
--
Lionel
msg07715/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 11:00:46AM +0100, DEFFONTAINES Vincent wrote:
> I managed to create several Virtualhosts on a apache-ssl (1.3) server (same
> IP, same port, several names).
> The "trick" is to use the same Certificate for every Virtualhost, which will
> of course generate a warning on bro
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 11:00:46AM +0100, DEFFONTAINES Vincent wrote:
> I managed to create several Virtualhosts on a apache-ssl (1.3) server (same
> IP, same port, several names).
> The "trick" is to use the same Certificate for every Virtualhost, which will
> of course generate a warning on bro
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 10:21:31PM +0200, Alberto Cortés wrote:
>> deb http://security.debian.org/ woody/updates main contrib non-free
> Since I am not living in the US, and some security updates deals with
> cryptographic software, I understand that it will be illegal for me
> downloading thes
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 10:21:31PM +0200, Alberto Cortés wrote:
>> deb http://security.debian.org/ woody/updates main contrib non-free
> Since I am not living in the US, and some security updates deals with
> cryptographic software, I understand that it will be illegal for me
> downloading the
On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 08:47:27AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello!
> Anybody know of a tool like PGPDisk for Linux?
Google for "Linux encrypted loopback", should give results.
--
Lionel
pgpg8CvXAWNIt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 12:21:20PM +0200, eim wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 12:10, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 11:47:25AM +0200, eim wrote:
>>> * May 1 11:48:10 foobox in.qpopper[11047]: @foo.bar.org: -ERR Unknown
>>> command: "capa&qu
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 11:47:25AM +0200, eim wrote:
> * May 1 11:48:10 foobox in.qpopper[11047]: connect from foo.bar.org
> * May 1 11:48:10 foobox in.qpopper[11047]: @foo.bar.org: -ERR Unknown
> command: "capa".
>
> Well, (-ERR Unknown command: "capa") sounds quite strange,
> anyone has idea
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 12:21:20PM +0200, eim wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 12:10, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 11:47:25AM +0200, eim wrote:
>>> * May 1 11:48:10 foobox in.qpopper[11047]: @foo.bar.org: -ERR Unknown
>>> command: "capa&qu
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 11:47:25AM +0200, eim wrote:
> * May 1 11:48:10 foobox in.qpopper[11047]: connect from foo.bar.org
> * May 1 11:48:10 foobox in.qpopper[11047]: @foo.bar.org: -ERR Unknown
> command: "capa".
>
> Well, (-ERR Unknown command: "capa") sounds quite strange,
> anyone has idea
On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 08:01:04AM -0800, Stephen Hassard wrote:
> What's the best way to figure out the admin for a subnet from a
> machine's IP?
whois the_ip_adress
--
Lionel Mamane
pgpMU0pdcNCQO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 08:01:04AM -0800, Stephen Hassard wrote:
> What's the best way to figure out the admin for a subnet from a
> machine's IP?
whois the_ip_adress
--
Lionel Mamane
msg06057/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
37 matches
Mail list logo
