On 06/10/14 20:40, Simon Valiquette wrote:
> Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez un jour écrivit:
>>>> Maybe your http client is unable to understand Content-Encoding: gzip ?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I downloaded the files from the provided location with Links2 web
>
On 06/10/14 17:59, Marko Randjelovic wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 03:25:27 +0200
> Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>
>>>>
>>>> I have built patched packages for lenny. You can download them from here:
>>>>
>>>> http://people.igalia.c
On 04/10/14 06:44, Marko Randjelovic wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Oct 2014 17:30:11 +0200
> Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>
>> On 01/10/14 13:28, Nikolay Hristov wrote:
>>> Hello there,
>>>
>>> I know that this is outdated debian release and it is in t
On 01/10/14 13:28, Nikolay Hristov wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> I know that this is outdated debian release and it is in the archives
> but I still have 6 servers running Lenny and I don't want to upgrade
> them to newer versions for several reasons.
> Any chance that we will get official debian pack
On 13/01/13 21:36, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> -
> Debian Security Advisory DSA-2605-1 secur...@debian.org
> http://www.debian.org/security/ Thijs Kinkhorst
> January 13, 2013
On 02/12/12 22:50, daniel curtis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to inform about a new stack-based buffer overflow
> vulnerability for MySQL. The following CVEs have been assigned
> to track this MySQL vulnerability:
>
> CVE-2012-5611 MySQL (Linux) Stack based buffer overrun PoC Zeroday
> CVE-2012-
AM and therefore an attacker that has compromised the
master can extract the key easily from there.
Regards!
[1]
http://blog.neutrino.es/2011/unlocking-a-luks-encrypted-root-partition-remotely-via-ssh/
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Carl
che search" segfaults on squeeze after the failed upgrade [1]
Here is a quick workaround for this issue:
sed -i "/^None/d"
/var/lib/apt/lists/security.debian.org_dists_squeeze_updates_main_binary-amd64_Packages
Regards!
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=661502
--
~~~
On 05/02/12 22:52, Luk Claes wrote:
> On 02/05/2012 05:23 PM, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>> On 04/02/12 01:12, Luk Claes wrote:
>>> On 02/03/2012 10:35 PM, Mario Antonio wrote:
>>>> Do you think that there will be a fix for Lenny even though
>>>>
~~~~~~~~
Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez http://neutrino.es
Igalia - Free Software Engineeringhttp://www.igalia.com
~~~
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=605090
--
~~~~~~~~~~~
Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez http://neutrino.es
Igalia - Free Software Engineeringhttp://www.igalia.com
~~~
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
https://lwn.net/Articles/467615/
[...]
Ideally, a table like the above should have no "none" entries at all.
There was no distributor without unpatched vulnerabilities, but some
clearly have more than others. It is, in particular, sad to see so many
missing updates in the Debian column. One could a
On 26/08/11 13:22, linbloke wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm curious as to why you suggest option 2 over option 1 from the Apache
> advisory? My guess is that it is compatible with version 1.3 and 2.x and
> that is has stronger enforcement of the syntax (by requiring ^bytes=)
> rather than just 5 comma sep
On 26/08/11 11:17, Christian Hammers wrote:
> Hallo
>
> Word is spreading that "Request-Range:" seems to be a synonym to "Range:" and
> is similar vulnerable but not covered by the config snippets that were
> proposed yesterday. So Gentlemen, patch again! :-(
>
Confirmed!.
Just modified the sugg
On 24/08/11 14:12, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
>
> Would that work for all websites of a Debian server if placed into a
> file located in /etc/apache2/conf.d ?
>
> Will other rewrites will be fine in the normal conf files for each website?
>
> Thanks
It should not mess with another redirects that y
On 24/08/11 12:13, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
> You can use the following redirect as a temporally workaround:
>
> # a2enmod rewrite
>
> RewriteEngine On
> RewriteCond %{HTTP:Range} bytes=0-.* [NC]
> RewriteRule .? http://%{SERVER_NAME}/ [R=302,L]
>
Sorry, the
On 24/08/11 12:45, Andrea Zwirner wrote:
> 2011/8/24 Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez
>
>> On 24/08/11 08:53, Dirk Hartmann wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> it is possible to dos a actual squeeze-apache2 with easy to forge
>>> rage-requests:
>>>
>&
On 24/08/11 08:53, Dirk Hartmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it is possible to dos a actual squeeze-apache2 with easy to forge
> rage-requests:
>
> http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2011-August/082299.html
>
> Apache-devs are working on a solution:
>
> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/list
On 12/30/2010 01:40 PM, Account for Debian group mail wrote:
>
> Are you saying that dselect is no longer usefull on doing security
> upgrades? I've been using dselect for over 15 years doing just that. The
> only time I've used aptitude is for doing major version upgrades. If there
> is a problem
On 12/29/2010 03:34 AM, Account for Debian group mail wrote:
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> The following packages will be REMOVED
> bind9 bind9-host bind9utils dnsutils libbind9-50 libisccfg50
> The following packages will be upgr
On 12/17/2010 12:35 PM, Vladislav Kurz wrote:
> On Friday 17 of December 2010, Thorsten Göllner wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have installed Debian 5.0.7. Since 2 days my exim4 does not deliver
>> mails. I always get the message, that the mail is not routeable. I only
>> used "dpkg-reconfigure exim4-config
On 12/17/2010 12:00 PM, Thorsten Göllner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have installed Debian 5.0.7. Since 2 days my exim4 does not deliver
> mails. I always get the message, that the mail is not routeable. I only
> used "dpkg-reconfigure exim4-config" without touching one config file by
> hand. I detected a
22 matches
Mail list logo
