I don't know if wu-ftpd is configurable to do otherwise, but on my
installation only anonymous users are chrooted (to /home/ftp, which has
bin, etc and lib dirs.)
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 09:48:54AM -0500, Steve Johnson wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm using wu-ftpd and set up /etc/wu-ftpd/ftpaccess to allow onl
I don't know if wu-ftpd is configurable to do otherwise, but on my
installation only anonymous users are chrooted (to /home/ftp, which has
bin, etc and lib dirs.)
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 09:48:54AM -0500, Steve Johnson wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm using wu-ftpd and set up /etc/wu-ftpd/ftpaccess to allow onl
mes you need to be creative in figuring out the package name to
look for, although 'apt-cache search' helps a lot. If you can't find a
module you need, the dh-make-perl package automates the process for
packaging a module.
Bob Nielsen
On Fri, Jul 19, 2002 at 09:36:01AM +0900, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> Bob Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Today's release of 2.2.5-10 appears to have resolved the problem.
>
> For unstable perhaps, but not for us folks sticking with testing.
I am running
Today's release of 2.2.5-10 appears to have resolved the problem.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 05:55:17PM +0200, Thomas Buhk wrote:
> > locales because the glibc_2.2.5-9.woody.4.deb would be
> > missing. I had a
>
> hm... no problem this morning on several systems, all work fine with
> 'apt-get update; apt-get upgrade'
But did locales get removed?
There is no gl
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 08:12:56AM -0700, Bob Nielsen wrote:
> Yeah, I still get a few false positives and have had to tweak things a
> bit (adding whitelist entries, etc.)
>
> Something strange has happened in the past few days, however. I
> started seeing messages that didn&#
Yeah, I still get a few false positives and have had to tweak things a
bit (adding whitelist entries, etc.)
Something strange has happened in the past few days, however. I
started seeing messages that didn't appear to have gone through
spamassassin at all. Some of these were obviously spam. In
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 02:18:16PM +0900, Howland, Curtis wrote:
> > What bothers me in all of this is that Debian lists are
> > managed so poorly
> > to let this happen.
>
> The Debian lists are deliberately not "subscriber only may post" on
> the theory that it's better to press DEL than to pre
The user "sshd" is created when the package is upgraded.
Bob
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 05:11:15PM -0700, Jason Love wrote:
> The report for the open ssh exploit fix says that the ssh fix will
> create a new ssh user (if there is not one already). I have done a few
> updates already and the ssh user
10 matches
Mail list logo
