Yeah, I still get a few false positives and have had to tweak things a bit (adding whitelist entries, etc.)
Something strange has happened in the past few days, however. I started seeing messages that didn't appear to have gone through spamassassin at all. Some of these were obviously spam. In checking, I see the following happening with fetchmail: reading message [EMAIL PROTECTED]:7 of 16 (3715 octets) ...procmail: Program failure (-11) of "/usr/bin/spamassassin" procmail: Rescue of unfiltered data succeeded fetchmail: MDA returned nonzero status 62720 not flushed Somehow spamassassin is failing and the message gets "rescued" by procmail so I see it. These messages do not get flushed at my ISP, so I get them as duplicates later. Now if I can only figure out what the error is.... Bob On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 09:01:37AM +0200, Lupe Christoph wrote: > On Tuesday, 2002-07-02 at 15:02:14 +0900, Howland, Curtis wrote: > > If I remember correctly, doesn't that require sendmail? > > Doesn't here. I run it from procmail, which is invoked from postfix: > > (In /etc/procmailrc:) > # Spamassasin > :0fw > | /usr/bin/spamc > > My personal .procmailrc files supposed Spam in a separate folder. > I review this folder for false positives. Happens once a week or so. > > > As for "bounce", while Kmail has that feature it does require a real > > reply-to address. For the vast majority of spam, the reply-to is > > deliberately obfuscated. > > You'd just be bombarding some innocent victim. I know. I received > about 20,000 bounces for invalid addresses. > > > > apt-get install spamassassin > > > > It trapped that one for me as well as 99% of the spam I receive. > > I still find a Spam in my norfmal inbox now and then. Not enough > to warrant tweaking Spamassasin's rules. > > Lupe Christoph -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
