On Wed, 13 Apr 2016, Bjoern Nyjorden wrote:
> Given that this is not the first occurrence,
I think it is, actually. As often is the case in the swiss-cheese
model, here all the holes lined up and the update of this security
mirror was delayed for about two days.
We can identify at least four ca
Free as in "freedom" operating systems, and a free-ish and open internet
are global, vital and empowering assets that I guess a lot of us tend to
take for granted.
Keep up the good work. I hope to be in a better position in the future,
to have something worthwhile to contribute to the Debian,
Hi again,
Yes, as at ~ 0810 +0800 (0010 UTC) today; the server address below was
resolving to the IP Address that you correctly assumed:
URI:
http://security.debian.org/debian-security/pool/updates/main/i/imagemagick/
IP Address: 150.203.164.61 (at my Australian location).
The imagemagi
On Wed, 2016-04-13 at 13:21 +0800, Bjoern Nyjorden wrote:
> * 1. Although my inbox has the time stamp of 19:50 +0800 (12:50
> +0100); the email below did not show up in my inbox until 23:40 +0800
> (16:40 +0100) - the time my ISP reports receiving the mail. It
> certainly was not in my inbox
Hi Adam,
The reason there has been a delay in my reply to your email below:
* 1. Although my inbox has the time stamp of 19:50 +0800 (12:50
+0100); the email below did not show up in my inbox until 23:40 +0800
(16:40 +0100) - the time my ISP reports receiving the mail. It
certainly was not
On Tue, 12 Apr 2016, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 08:56:35PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> >Then, maybe we should consider a better way to deal with areas where you
> >get only one choice out of geoip?
>
> Reach out to the relevant team outlining your issues (e.g.,
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 08:56:35PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Then, maybe we should consider a better way to deal with areas where you
get only one choice out of geoip?
Reach out to the relevant team outlining your issues (e.g., lack of IPv6
connectivity)? Advising people to har
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016, at 16:47, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>
> > We list several mirrors carrying debian security updates in
> > https://www.debian.org/mirror/list-full
>
> I think we shouldn't.
Well, we do, regardless of whether we should o
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016, at 16:37, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 04:19:20PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
> wrote:
> >We don't disclose which mirrors are members of the security.debian.org
> >pool anywhere (that I could find), so we are currently hiding everything
> >behind sec
Hi
The upcoming Samba update is bigger than usual since for Jessie an
update is needed to 4.2. We want to expose the package a bit more for
additional testing. Please test the packages found on
https://people.debian.org/~carnil/tmp/samba/
(no apt repository available for these test packa
On Tue, 12 Apr 2016, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> We list several mirrors carrying debian security updates in
> https://www.debian.org/mirror/list-full
I think we shouldn't.
> We don't disclose which mirrors are members of the security.debian.org
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/mirror/d
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 04:19:20PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
We don't disclose which mirrors are members of the security.debian.org
pool anywhere (that I could find), so we are currently hiding everything
behind security.debian.org. This wasn't a problem when a DNS lookup for
secu
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016, at 14:32, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2016, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016, at 14:06, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > Judging from your e-mail address, I'm going to assume that the answer is
> > > that security.debian.org resolved to 150.
On Tue, 12 Apr 2016, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016, at 14:06, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Judging from your e-mail address, I'm going to assume that the answer is
> > that security.debian.org resolved to 150.203.164.61.
> >
> > Apparently there was an issue with syncin
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016, at 14:06, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Judging from your e-mail address, I'm going to assume that the answer is
> that security.debian.org resolved to 150.203.164.61.
>
> Apparently there was an issue with syncing to that mirror. The sysadmin
> team have triggered a manual sync
On 2016-04-12 16:35, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 2016-04-12 15:42, Bjoern Nyjorden wrote:
Hi Luciano and others,
AS AT: 2230(+0800) (1430(+)):
* Imagemagick version 8:6.7.7.10-5+deb7u4 is STILL NOT AVAILABLE
at:
http://security.debian.org/debian-security/pool/updates/main/i/imagemagic
Bjoern Nyjorden wrote:
> Hi Luciano and others,
>
> AS AT: 2230(+0800) (1430(+)):
>
> * Imagemagick version 8:6.7.7.10-5+deb7u4 is STILL NOT AVAILABLE at:
>
>
> http://security.debian.org/debian-security/pool/updates/main/i/imagemagick/
They look good to me at the moment (2016-04-12T15:
On 2016-04-12 15:42, Bjoern Nyjorden wrote:
Hi Luciano and others,
AS AT: 2230(+0800) (1430(+)):
* Imagemagick version 8:6.7.7.10-5+deb7u4 is STILL NOT AVAILABLE at:
http://security.debian.org/debian-security/pool/updates/main/i/imagemagick/
* Aptitude (or apt-get) is unable to upda
Hi Luciano and others,
AS AT: 2230(+0800) (1430(+)):
* Imagemagick version 8:6.7.7.10-5+deb7u4 is STILL NOT AVAILABLE at:
http://security.debian.org/debian-security/pool/updates/main/i/imagemagick/
* Aptitude (or apt-get) is unable to update as a result
Can you please ensure that th
On Tuesday 12 April 2016 19.21.57 Bjoern Nyjorden wrote:
> Imagemagick version 8:6.7.7.10-5+deb7u4 is STILL NOT AVAILABLE at the
> http://security.debian.org/ server.
>
> I'm very concerned about this. Will the updated version be uploaded soon?
It should be now. It appears in https://tracker.d
On 2016-04-12 12:21, Bjoern Nyjorden wrote:
Hi again,
Imagemagick version 8:6.7.7.10-5+deb7u4 is STILL NOT AVAILABLE at the
http://security.debian.org/ server.
I'm very concerned about this. Will the updated version be uploaded
soon?
What IP address does security.debian.org resolve to for
Hi again,
Imagemagick version 8:6.7.7.10-5+deb7u4 is STILL NOT AVAILABLE at the
http://security.debian.org/ server.
I'm very concerned about this. Will the updated version be uploaded soon?
Yours sincerely,
Bjoern.
On 12/04/16 03:12, Luciano Bello wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE
22 matches
Mail list logo
