El Jan 12, 2012, a las 18:32, Bichoy Waguih escribió:
> I highly appreciate your support and suggestions.
>
> -Bichoy
Disregarding the fact that your question is probably off topic, I'll try to
point you in a direction that might help you. You may want to submit this to a
"user" list or use a
On 01/12/12 17:32, Bichoy Waguih wrote:
> Hello Debian World,
>
> I have a small problem with Debian NIS authentication. Mainly, I have NIS
> server running on a Mandriva Linux machine and I want to configure a
> Debian
> machine to be a client for this NIS server.
>
> The Debian client receives th
On 01/12/12 16:16, Karl Goetz wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 11:19:41 +0100
> Poison Bit wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 7:48 AM, Davit Avsharyan
>> wrote:
>>> I know how to change it :). I just wanted to understand why it
>>> comes with 755 and not 700 ?
>>> Few years ago, if I'm not mistaken,
Hello Debian World,
I have a small problem with Debian NIS authentication. Mainly, I have NIS
server running on a Mandriva Linux machine and I want to configure a Debian
machine to be a client for this NIS server.
The Debian client receives the 'passwd' table correctly and I am able to
check
it w
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 11:19:41 +0100
Poison Bit wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 7:48 AM, Davit Avsharyan
> wrote:
> > I know how to change it :). I just wanted to understand why it
> > comes with 755 and not 700 ?
> > Few years ago, if I'm not mistaken, everything was 700.
>
> No less than 9 yea
On 01/12/12 04:19, Poison Bit wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 7:48 AM, Davit Avsharyan wrote:
>> I know how to change it :). I just wanted to understand why it comes with
>> 755 and not 700 ?
>> Few years ago, if I'm not mistaken, everything was 700.
The commit log(2000) is: Load adduser-3.12 int
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Chris Davies wrote:
> Poison Bit wrote:
>> Why filter to those in /etc/shells ? I mean... the filter should be
>> applied by the system :)
>
> Mainly because it's a convenient list of "real" shells, and some of the
> remote service applications require a shell to
Poison Bit wrote:
> Why filter to those in /etc/shells ? I mean... the filter should be
> applied by the system :)
Mainly because it's a convenient list of "real" shells, and some of the
remote service applications require a shell to be in that list. FTP is
one such that springs to mind. As a cou
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Chris Davies
wrote:
> Davit Avsharyan wrote:
>> 1/ I'm wondering why most of the system users have valid shells by
>> default ?
>> /cat /etc/passwd | grep -E '(sh|bash)' | wc -l
>> *21*/
>
> That's not necessarily sufficient to determine valid shells: the absenc
Davit Avsharyan wrote:
> 1/ I'm wondering why most of the system users have valid shells by
> default ?
> /cat /etc/passwd | grep -E '(sh|bash)' | wc -l
> *21*/
That's not necessarily sufficient to determine valid shells: the absence
of a shell definition implies the use of /bin/sh, so you need
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 7:48 AM, Davit Avsharyan wrote:
> I know how to change it :). I just wanted to understand why it comes with
> 755 and not 700 ?
> Few years ago, if I'm not mistaken, everything was 700.
No less than 9 years.
In 2003 I see the 755:
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/add
11 matches
Mail list logo
