Andrew Fraser IT consultantNetwork Engineering Network Security0413 495 372Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Web Hosting - establish your business online
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Anders Prisak wrote:
[...]
> I tried really, really hard to stay out of this but this one is just too big
> to let by. Yes, France has sold weapons to Irak. It has done so along with
> the US, britain and germany. That was during
Andreas Kotes wrote:
Hi!
* Tom Panning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20030312 03:13]:
Solicitor/lawyer deposits a sensitive document on a "server" and only
select ppl whom that lawyer selects can access or download that
document. It must be secure, auditable and keep lawyers happy!
well, in c
Andrew Fraser IT consultantNetwork Engineering Network Security0413 495 372Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Web Hosting - establish your business online
Hi!
* Tom Panning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20030312 03:13]:
> Solicitor/lawyer deposits a sensitive document on a "server" and only
> select ppl whom that lawyer selects can access or download that
> document. It must be secure, auditable and keep lawyers happy!
well, in case you don't trust https et
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 08:59:26PM -0500, Hubert Chan wrote:
> Perhaps in your non-chroot environment, you have debsig-verify turned
> off in /etc/dpkg/dpkg.cfg ("no-debsig" option).
I got excited and thought you'd hit it... then I
checked and found that both have no-debsig set. So
I'm still at a
> "Dale" == Dale Amon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dale> I'm trying to figure out what is missing. I've got a chrooted
Dale> environment in which I'm building a base.tgz, and on some dpkg's I
Dale> am getting errors:
[snip]
Debian packages are not signed, which is why debsig-verify fails.
Da
On Tuesday 11 March 2003 04:09 am, thing wrote:
> Steve Hagerman wrote:
> >Thank You Nathan. Apears I am not the only blind fool LOL
> >Steve Hagerman
> >http://www.thechurchofgod.org/doctrine.shtml
> >http://www.dnspad.com/
> >
> >Debian rocks
> >
> >-Original Message-
>
> From: Nathan E N
Guys, PLEASE!!
Peace is a problem of major importance, but it IS off-topic here.
Please move to another group or use priv if you have some contrary
opinions to discuss.
greetz
k.
imagine all the people
--
___
|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Anders Prisak wrote:
[...]
> I tried really, really hard to stay out of this but this one is just too big
> to let by. Yes, France has sold weapons to Irak. It has done so along with
> the US, britain and germany. That was during
Andreas Kotes wrote:
Hi!
* Tom Panning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20030312 03:13]:
Solicitor/lawyer deposits a sensitive document on a "server" and only
select ppl whom that lawyer selects can access or download that
document. It must be secure, auditable and keep lawyers happy!
well, in case y
Hi!
* Tom Panning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20030312 03:13]:
> Solicitor/lawyer deposits a sensitive document on a "server" and only
> select ppl whom that lawyer selects can access or download that
> document. It must be secure, auditable and keep lawyers happy!
well, in case you don't trust https et
I'm trying to figure out what is missing. I've got a
chrooted environment in which I'm building a base.tgz,
and on some dpkg's I am getting errors:
debsig-verify --list-policies dhcp-client_2.0pl5-11_i386.deb
debsig: Listing usable policies
debsig: Origin Signature check failed. This deb might
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 08:59:26PM -0500, Hubert Chan wrote:
> Perhaps in your non-chroot environment, you have debsig-verify turned
> off in /etc/dpkg/dpkg.cfg ("no-debsig" option).
I got excited and thought you'd hit it... then I
checked and found that both have no-debsig set. So
I'm still at a
- Original Message -
From: "Tomasz Rola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ted Parvu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Tomasz Rola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 11:41 PM
Subject: Re: Peace is not off topic
[snip]
>
> Now, Germany, France and Russia don't want to loose their market
> "Dale" == Dale Amon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dale> I'm trying to figure out what is missing. I've got a chrooted
Dale> environment in which I'm building a base.tgz, and on some dpkg's I
Dale> am getting errors:
[snip]
Debian packages are not signed, which is why debsig-verify fails.
Da
On Tuesday 11 March 2003 04:09 am, thing wrote:
> Steve Hagerman wrote:
> >Thank You Nathan. Apears I am not the only blind fool LOL
> >Steve Hagerman
> >http://www.thechurchofgod.org/doctrine.shtml
> >http://www.dnspad.com/
> >
> >Debian rocks
> >
> >-Original Message-
>
> From: Nathan E N
Guys, PLEASE!!
Peace is a problem of major importance, but it IS off-topic here.
Please move to another group or use priv if you have some contrary
opinions to discuss.
greetz
k.
imagine all the people
--
___
|
It would be useful to have something that would take
an IP address range and return the minimum coverage
CIDR for that block (for use in feeding to iptables).
For example, if I want to allow access for hosts
1.2.3.1 - 1.2.3.4, I currently can allow them
individually or just allow the entire /24. B
Bill wrote:
> I want to block all ip's ending in 224 to 255 but not 220 and others
> searching the net I found I need to add "/27" to end of the ip.
> I understand /8 /16 /24 /32 somewhat but...
Netmasks work using a binary logical AND operation. A few years ago, you
would be using something like
Thanks ian,
Your pointer turned out to be most valuable. If anyone else wants to
know I found this table most helpful.
google search result on:howto CIDR range
http://www.obfuscation.org/techs/cidr-conversion-table.html
On March 11, 2003 03:51 pm, you wrote:
>Bill, just a tip, but
This is an excellent guide to understanding IP addresses.
http://www.3com.com/other/pdfs/infra/corpinfo/en_US/501302.pdf
shawn
> Hello Debian,
>
> I want to block all ip's ending in 224 to 255 but not 220 and others
> searching the net I found I need to add "/27" to end of the ip.
> I unders
I'm trying to figure out what is missing. I've got a
chrooted environment in which I'm building a base.tgz,
and on some dpkg's I am getting errors:
debsig-verify --list-policies dhcp-client_2.0pl5-11_i386.deb
debsig: Listing usable policies
debsig: Origin Signature check failed. This deb might
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Spencer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 9:19 PM
Subject: Re: OT: Consensus
> I am someone who rarely (if ever) posts to this list.
> What Ted and Thomas have said is reasonable.
Of course its reasonable, in fact, why don't we move
- Original Message -
From: "Tomasz Rola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ted Parvu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Tomasz Rola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 11:41 PM
Subject: Re: Peace is not off topic
[snip]
>
> Now, Germany, France and Russia don't want to
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Bill wrote:
> I want to block all ip's ending in 224 to 255 but not 220 and others
> searching the net I found I need to add "/27" to end of the ip.
> I understand /8 /16 /24 /32 somewhat but...
All the numbers after a / define a subnet. For example a /24 subnet
contais 256 a
Hi
Consider each octet of an IP address in turn.
Octet:-
256-(2^n(4)).256-(2^n(3)).256-(2^n(2)).256-(2^n(1))
start with n(1), then n(2) and through to n(4).
where 0<=n(x)<=8
and x=1;x<=4;x++
and where x increments n(x-1)==8 always.
and to get the prefix length /mm =32 - (sum n(x))
Alasta
It would be useful to have something that would take
an IP address range and return the minimum coverage
CIDR for that block (for use in feeding to iptables).
For example, if I want to allow access for hosts
1.2.3.1 - 1.2.3.4, I currently can allow them
individually or just allow the entire /24. B
Bill wrote:
Hello Debian,
I want to block all ip's ending in 224 to 255 but not 220 and others
searching the net I found I need to add "/27" to end of the ip.
I understand /8 /16 /24 /32 somewhat but...
My question: what makes /27 significant
X.Y.Z.224 - X.Y.Z.255
deny from 63.148.99.224/27
Bill wrote:
> I want to block all ip's ending in 224 to 255 but not 220 and others
> searching the net I found I need to add "/27" to end of the ip.
> I understand /8 /16 /24 /32 somewhat but...
Netmasks work using a binary logical AND operation. A few years ago, you
would be using something like
Thanks ian,
Your pointer turned out to be most valuable. If anyone else wants to
know I found this table most helpful.
google search result on:howto CIDR range
http://www.obfuscation.org/techs/cidr-conversion-table.html
On March 11, 2003 03:51 pm, you wrote:
>Bill, just a tip, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Ted Parvu wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 05:10:29PM -, Jeff wrote:
> > Way off topic - please take the thread private or somewhere more
> > appropriate.
> > I subscribe to this list for Debian security announcements.
>
> Th
This is an excellent guide to understanding IP addresses.
http://www.3com.com/other/pdfs/infra/corpinfo/en_US/501302.pdf
shawn
> Hello Debian,
>
> I want to block all ip's ending in 224 to 255 but not 220 and others
> searching the net I found I need to add "/27" to end of the ip.
> I unders
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Spencer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 9:19 PM
Subject: Re: OT: Consensus
> I am someone who rarely (if ever) posts to this list.
> What Ted and Thomas have said is reasonable.
Of course its reasonable, in fact
http://www.ralphb.net/IPSubnet/class_a.html
That is a page I use whenever I need to do anything with subnets.
It explains that the /27 subnet has 30 hosts.
So if you only wanted to block hosts X.Y.Z.23 - X.Y.Z.55 I would do
everything under 64.. otherwise you get into defining multiple subnets so
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Bill wrote:
> I want to block all ip's ending in 224 to 255 but not 220 and others
> searching the net I found I need to add "/27" to end of the ip.
> I understand /8 /16 /24 /32 somewhat but...
All the numbers after a / define a subnet. For example a /24 subnet
contais 256 a
On 2003/03/11 02:12:12PM -0600, Tue, Bill wrote:
> Hello Debian,
>
> I want to block all ip's ending in 224 to 255 but not 220 and others
> searching the net I found I need to add "/27" to end of the ip.
> I understand /8 /16 /24 /32 somewhat but...
>
> My question: what makes /27 significant
>
Hi
Consider each octet of an IP address in turn.
Octet:-
256-(2^n(4)).256-(2^n(3)).256-(2^n(2)).256-(2^n(1))
start with n(1), then n(2) and through to n(4).
where 0<=n(x)<=8
and x=1;x<=4;x++
and where x increments n(x-1)==8 always.
and to get the prefix length /mm =32 - (sum n(x))
Alasta
Bill wrote:
Hello Debian,
I want to block all ip's ending in 224 to 255 but not 220 and others
searching the net I found I need to add "/27" to end of the ip.
I understand /8 /16 /24 /32 somewhat but...
My question: what makes /27 significant
X.Y.Z.224 - X.Y.Z.255
deny from 63.148.99.224/27
Tha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Ted Parvu wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 05:10:29PM -, Jeff wrote:
> > Way off topic - please take the thread private or somewhere more
> > appropriate.
> > I subscribe to this list for Debian security announcements.
>
> Th
I am someone who rarely (if ever) posts to this list.
What Ted and Thomas have said is reasonable.
It's not a major problem to anyone here to filter an email if they don't
want to see off topic messages.
Just make it clear it's off topic.
I suggest the [OT] tag is appropriate.
It's bette
http://www.ralphb.net/IPSubnet/class_a.html
That is a page I use whenever I need to do anything with subnets.
It explains that the /27 subnet has 30 hosts.
So if you only wanted to block hosts X.Y.Z.23 - X.Y.Z.55 I would do
everything under 64.. otherwise you get into defining multiple subnets so
On 2003/03/11 02:12:12PM -0600, Tue, Bill wrote:
> Hello Debian,
>
> I want to block all ip's ending in 224 to 255 but not 220 and others
> searching the net I found I need to add "/27" to end of the ip.
> I understand /8 /16 /24 /32 somewhat but...
>
> My question: what makes /27 significant
>
I am someone who rarely (if ever) posts to this list.
What Ted and Thomas have said is reasonable.
It's not a major problem to anyone here to filter an email if they don't
want to see off topic messages.
Just make it clear it's off topic.
I suggest the [OT] tag is appropriate.
It's bette
Hello Debian,
I want to block all ip's ending in 224 to 255 but not 220 and others
searching the net I found I need to add "/27" to end of the ip.
I understand /8 /16 /24 /32 somewhat but...
My question: what makes /27 significant
X.Y.Z.224 - X.Y.Z.255
deny from 63.148.99.224/27
Thanks
P.s. fo
Hello Debian,
I want to block all ip's ending in 224 to 255 but not 220 and others
searching the net I found I need to add "/27" to end of the ip.
I understand /8 /16 /24 /32 somewhat but...
My question: what makes /27 significant
X.Y.Z.224 - X.Y.Z.255
deny from 63.148.99.224/27
Thanks
P.s. fo
No no. I have had been having the problem for quite a few days :( besides I
also use the www.mirror.ac.uk service too!
- Original Message -
From: "Desai, Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 5:48 PM
Subject: RE: iptables and apt-get
> Hi. My guess is that securit
Also, there's Debian-curiosa.
And Ted, Your absolutely wrong, there are guidelings for this list and
for all the other debian lists.
You should go and read the follwing from the link below.
http://www.foldoc.org/foldoc/foldoc.cgi?query=spam
Which is linked directly from the Debian mailing list
On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 12:06, Jeff wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Duzlevski, Ognen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Ted Parvu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc:
> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 3:28 PM
> Subject: Re: OT: Consensus
>
>
> > Ted,
> >
> > please, take this somewhere else. In the pa
Hi Thomas,
don't get me wrong, I did not mean any disrespect for Ted or the list or
anyone's opinions. I merely stated that there are better places to discuss
the politics of war or today than here. I know there are filters -
this is the first time I am actually considering using one. My point
(wh
No no. I have had been having the problem for quite a few days :( besides I
also use the www.mirror.ac.uk service too!
- Original Message -
From: "Desai, Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 5:48 PM
Subject: RE: iptables and apt-get
> Hi. My gu
I agree with Nicolas and Ognen. There are lots of places for this kind
of discussion OUT OF DEBIAN LISTS. Please, find appropriate place
somewhere else.
Thanks
Vlada
On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 17:30, Nicolas BLANC wrote:
> > Ted,
> >
> > please, take this somewhere else. In the past days this debate h
Also, there's Debian-curiosa.
And Ted, Your absolutely wrong, there are guidelings for this list and
for all the other debian lists.
You should go and read the follwing from the link below.
http://www.foldoc.org/foldoc/foldoc.cgi?query=spam
Which is linked directly from the Debian mailing list
On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 12:06, Jeff wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Duzlevski, Ognen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Ted Parvu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 3:28 PM
> Subject: Re: OT: Consensus
>
>
> > Ted,
> >
> > please, take this somewh
Hi. My guess is that security.debian.org was not available when you tried
it (there were other posts to this list indicating that the server was
down). So you were getting icmp errors back. The RELATED state allows
this. If security.debian.org was up and running, you probably would not
have had
Posted on announce on error... Here is my original post for security:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (François TOURDE) writes:
> I.R.van Dongen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Tue, 11 Mar 2003 14:48:20 -
> > "Ian Goodall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > All is fine now. Adding the line:
> > >
Hi Thomas,
don't get me wrong, I did not mean any disrespect for Ted or the list or
anyone's opinions. I merely stated that there are better places to discuss
the politics of war or today than here. I know there are filters -
this is the first time I am actually considering using one. My point
(wh
Am Dienstag, 11. März 2003 16:28 schrieb Duzlevski, Ognen:
> Ted,
>
> please, take this somewhere else. In the past days this debate has filled
> up my mailbox - if I wanted such a debate I would have turned on the TV or
> done something similar. I subscribed to this list for debian security
> reas
- Original Message -
From: "Duzlevski, Ognen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ted Parvu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 3:28 PM
Subject: Re: OT: Consensus
> Ted,
>
> please, take this somewhere else. In the past days this debate has filled
> up my mailbox - if I wanted su
I agree with Nicolas and Ognen. There are lots of places for this kind
of discussion OUT OF DEBIAN LISTS. Please, find appropriate place
somewhere else.
Thanks
Vlada
On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 17:30, Nicolas BLANC wrote:
> > Ted,
> >
> > please, take this somewhere else. In the past days this debate h
> "Thomas" == Thomas Ritter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Thomas> By the way, as people asked for licenses like
Thomas> peace-only-use... Are there any licenses forbidding religious
Thomas> people to use software? They don't need computers and internet,
Thomas> they can pray all day long.
Hi. My guess is that security.debian.org was not available when you tried
it (there were other posts to this list indicating that the server was
down). So you were getting icmp errors back. The RELATED state allows
this. If security.debian.org was up and running, you probably would not
have had
ise a filter on
Peace is not off topic
STOP THE FUXXING PEACE TALKS!
and please mind your language.
truely yours, Joost.
>
> BLOODY HELL, TAKE THIS SHIT OFF HERE. I AM GETTING ANNOYED BY USELESS
> DISCUSSION OF THIS SORT ON *DEBIAN*-SECURITY.
>
> GO ELSEWHERE!
>
> --
> Please do not CC me w
Ted,
please, take this somewhere else. In the past days this debate has filled
up my mailbox - if I wanted such a debate I would have turned on the TV or
done something similar. I subscribed to this list for debian security
reasons, not to read lamentations and political views. pls, pls, pls, no
Posted on announce on error... Here is my original post for security:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (François TOURDE) writes:
> I.R.van Dongen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Tue, 11 Mar 2003 14:48:20 -
> > "Ian Goodall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > All is fine now. Adding the line:
> > >
On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 09:51, Ted Parvu wrote:
> Hello Debian Community!
>
[***SNIP!!!***]
> I would now like to demonstrate consensus in action. I have heard and
> respect the voices of the community that cry, "off topic!". I ask that
> you hear and respect the voices of the community who wa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there
On Tuesday 11 March 2003 15:48, Ian Goodall wrote:
> All is fine now. Adding the line:
>
> iptables -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
>
> fixes the problem. Does anyone know what this line does? I found this using
> an on
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 04:13:59PM +0100, I. R. van Dongen wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Mar 2003 14:48:20 -
> "Ian Goodall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > All is fine now. Adding the line:
> > iptables -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
> > fixes the problem. Does anyone know what t
Am Dienstag, 11. März 2003 16:28 schrieb Duzlevski, Ognen:
> Ted,
>
> please, take this somewhere else. In the past days this debate has filled
> up my mailbox - if I wanted such a debate I would have turned on the TV or
> done something similar. I subscribed to this list for debian security
> reas
If you are going to continue to post on this blatantly off topic subject,
please at least keep the subject line consistent. You are making difficult
to keep my procmail filters up to date.
Regards,
Ken
- Original Message -
From: "Duzlevski, Ognen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ted Parvu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 3:28 PM
Subject: Re: OT: Consensus
> Ted,
>
> please, take this somewhere else. In the past days this debate has filled
> up my mailb
Ted,
please, take this somewhere else. In the past days this debate has filled
up my mailbox - if I wanted such a debate I would have turned on the TV or
done something similar. I subscribed to this list for debian security
reasons, not to read lamentations and political views. pls, pls, pls, no
m
Ian Goodall, 2003-Mar-11 14:48 -:
> All is fine now. Adding the line:
>
> iptables -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
>
> fixes the problem. Does anyone know what this line does? I found this using
> an online script generator at http://www.iptables.1go.dk/index1.php.
Ip
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 22:42:33 -0500
"Steve Hagerman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thank God for a smart leader that is willing to fight to protect out
> way of life. And God bless all these good women and men going to fight
> that insane leader Saddam.
> We have struck a mighty blow against
> "Thomas" == Thomas Ritter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Thomas> By the way, as people asked for licenses like
Thomas> peace-only-use... Are there any licenses forbidding religious
Thomas> people to use software? They don't need computers and internet,
Thomas> they can pray all day long.
ise a filter on
Peace is not off topic
STOP THE FUXXING PEACE TALKS!
and please mind your language.
truely yours, Joost.
>
> BLOODY HELL, TAKE THIS SHIT OFF HERE. I AM GETTING ANNOYED BY USELESS
> DISCUSSION OF THIS SORT ON *DEBIAN*-SECURITY.
>
> GO ELSEWHERE!
>
> --
> Please do not CC me w
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003 14:48:20 -
"Ian Goodall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All is fine now. Adding the line:
>
> iptables -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
>
> fixes the problem. Does anyone know what this line does? I found this using
> an online script generator at htt
Ted,
please, take this somewhere else. In the past days this debate has filled
up my mailbox - if I wanted such a debate I would have turned on the TV or
done something similar. I subscribed to this list for debian security
reasons, not to read lamentations and political views. pls, pls, pls, no
On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 09:51, Ted Parvu wrote:
> Hello Debian Community!
>
[***SNIP!!!***]
> I would now like to demonstrate consensus in action. I have heard and
> respect the voices of the community that cry, "off topic!". I ask that
> you hear and respect the voices of the community who wa
Hello Debian Community!
I had hoped to hear from you, and hear from us we have. I look forward
to hearing from more of you around our world. I would like to address
some of the issues about this thread being off topic.
The debian-security list is an open, unmoderated, list created with the
int
Hi folks
Now that we have a lot of positions expressed here
and the thread is getting as emotional as one could
expect from the topic:
Let's proof the Debian community can do better and
get along peacefully and productive despite the fact
that we all have a different cultural and religious
backgr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there
On Tuesday 11 March 2003 15:48, Ian Goodall wrote:
> All is fine now. Adding the line:
>
> iptables -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
>
> fixes the problem. Does anyone know what this line does? I found this using
> an on
All is fine now. Adding the line:
iptables -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
fixes the problem. Does anyone know what this line does? I found this using
an online script generator at http://www.iptables.1go.dk/index1.php.
Thanks for all your help. This is the sort of thing
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 04:13:59PM +0100, I. R. van Dongen wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Mar 2003 14:48:20 -
> "Ian Goodall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > All is fine now. Adding the line:
> > iptables -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
> > fixes the problem. Does anyone know what t
If you are going to continue to post on this blatantly off topic subject,
please at least keep the subject line consistent. You are making difficult
to keep my procmail filters up to date.
Regards,
Ken
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
Ted,
please, take this somewhere else. In the past days this debate has filled
up my mailbox - if I wanted such a debate I would have turned on the TV or
done something similar. I subscribed to this list for debian security
reasons, not to read lamentations and political views. pls, pls, pls, no
m
Ian Goodall, 2003-Mar-11 14:48 -:
> All is fine now. Adding the line:
>
> iptables -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
>
> fixes the problem. Does anyone know what this line does? I found this using
> an online script generator at http://www.iptables.1go.dk/index1.php.
Ip
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 22:42:33 -0500
"Steve Hagerman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thank God for a smart leader that is willing to fight to protect out
> way of life. And God bless all these good women and men going to fight
> that insane leader Saddam.
> We have struck a mighty blow against
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003 14:48:20 -
"Ian Goodall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All is fine now. Adding the line:
>
> iptables -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
>
> fixes the problem. Does anyone know what this line does? I found this using
> an online script generator at htt
Hello Debian Community!
I had hoped to hear from you, and hear from us we have. I look forward
to hearing from more of you around our world. I would like to address
some of the issues about this thread being off topic.
The debian-security list is an open, unmoderated, list created with the
int
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, [iso-8859-1] Ren? Seindal wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 10:42:33PM -0500, Steve Hagerman wrote:
>
>> These people and their treasonist attitudes make me wish that our
>> nation would Enforce the laws against treason. Voicing an opinion is
>> one thing going against it Is qui
Hi folks
Now that we have a lot of positions expressed here
and the thread is getting as emotional as one could
expect from the topic:
Let's proof the Debian community can do better and
get along peacefully and productive despite the fact
that we all have a different cultural and religious
backgr
iptables -A OUTPUT -p tcp -d /32 --dport 80 -j ACCEPT
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003 00:45:48 -
"Ian Goodall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I am setting up iptables on my debain woody box. I have decided to close
> everyting and then open up just ssh and ssl. This obviously prevents my
>
All is fine now. Adding the line:
iptables -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT
fixes the problem. Does anyone know what this line does? I found this using
an online script generator at http://www.iptables.1go.dk/index1.php.
Thanks for all your help. This is the sort of thing
Hi!
* Cesar Rincon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20030311 07:16]:
> Well, I guess I am betraying you too, quite openly at that. What now?
> Am I evil and insane, too? Would you like to "enforce" your laws on me
> and my family?
>
> You better make sure I don't s
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 10:42:33PM -0500, Steve Hagerman wrote:
> These people and their treasonist attitudes make me wish that our
> nation would Enforce the laws against treason. Voicing an opinion is
> one thing going against it Is quite another.
This is the kind of totalitarian attitude that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cheese burgers are a security risk to your :
You should regularly install/reinstall the fibre.deb package
at least 3 times a day.
an this be automated?
I think the fibre.deb meta package is provided by the fruit.deb & veg.deb
packages.
On Tuesday
Well I think it's just annoying, keeping us away from mails really related to
Debian security. If you would like to discuss, why not simply create a forum and
invite everybody to post there ...
Don't you think it's quite enough and we should concentrate on the TOPIC this
list was created for?
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 06:35:33AM -0500, Jason Sopko wrote:
> I'd like to discuss cheeseburgers and how they relate to Debian
> security. I like mine cooked medium-well. Feel free to chime in with any
> other issues not related to Debian security, such as cheeseburgers and
> political views. Ma
I'd like to discuss cheeseburgers and how they relate to Debian
security. I like mine cooked medium-well. Feel free to chime in with any
other issues not related to Debian security, such as cheeseburgers and
political views. Maybe we can turn it into one of those joke of the day
lists. Wait, wa
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
