On Sat, 2003-01-18 at 16:22, Csillag Kristóf wrote:
> Soren Boll Overgaard pointed out that deleting the BCC fields from the
> mails sent to other recipients is not the mail client's responsibility.
> It should be done by the MTA.
ONLY, really ONLY if the MTA receives the mail per sendmail. I woul
All,
I have a web page that numerous clients need to update and
FrontPage/ftp does not work well in these situations...
(synchronization issues, etc.)
But has there been many known security issues with running the FrontPage
extensions with Apache? If there have been security issues has
Microsof
On Sat, 18 Jan 2003 18:39:05 +0200
Jussi Aalto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I connect to my ISP and tell my mailer to get mail from their pop
> server, Firestarter notifies about traffic from 192.25.206.10 (from
> ports 32768 and above), blocks it and after that the connection to my
> ISP fre
On Sat, 2003-01-18 at 16:22, Csillag Kristóf wrote:
> Soren Boll Overgaard pointed out that deleting the BCC fields from the
> mails sent to other recipients is not the mail client's responsibility.
> It should be done by the MTA.
ONLY, really ONLY if the MTA receives the mail per sendmail. I woul
please unsucribe me
All,
I have a web page that numerous clients need to update and
FrontPage/ftp does not work well in these situations...
(synchronization issues, etc.)
But has there been many known security issues with running the FrontPage
extensions with Apache? If there have been security issues has
Microsof
When I connect to my ISP and tell my mailer to get mail from their pop server,
Firestarter notifies about traffic from 192.25.206.10 (from ports 32768 and
above), blocks it and after that the connection to my ISP freezes until I halt
all traffic and restart the firewall. Same happens when I fire
Csillag Krist?f wrote:
>
> Soren Boll Overgaard pointed out that deleting the BCC fields from the
> mails sent to other recipients is not the mail client's responsibility.
> It should be done by the MTA.
Soren isn't entirely right. In practice its more sane for the MUA to
process, then remove, t
On Sat, 18 Jan 2003 18:39:05 +0200
Jussi Aalto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I connect to my ISP and tell my mailer to get mail from their pop
> server, Firestarter notifies about traffic from 192.25.206.10 (from
> ports 32768 and above), blocks it and after that the connection to my
> I
Hi,
On 18 Jan 2003 16:22:48 +0100, Csillag =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Krist=F3f?= writes:
>Soren Boll Overgaard pointed out that deleting the BCC fields from the
>mails sent to other recipients is not the mail client's responsibility.
>It should be done by the MTA.
> [...]
>So I guess this is a bug in the sen
I also checked exim packages 3.35-1 and 3.36-4 (from woody and sid).
All versions exhibit the same behavior.
I also tried KMail. It works properly, using the same local sendmail
program.
So I guess Evolution is using exim's sendmail program incorrectly.
ps. If you see my name e-mail address in t
please unsucribe me
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Soren Boll Overgaard pointed out that deleting the BCC fields from the
mails sent to other recipients is not the mail client's responsibility.
It should be done by the MTA.
So it is not Evolution's fault.
I am using Exim 3.36-3 from Sarge.
Evolution is configured to use /usr/sbin/sendmail for s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18 Jan 2003, Guenther Starnberger wrote:
> the last openldap upgrade (DSA-227-1) seems to break proftpd when using
> LDAP authentication with proftpd-ldap (at least on my i386 system).
>
> proftpd logs:
> Jan 18 11:51:07 osprey proftpd[349]: foo (b
When I connect to my ISP and tell my mailer to get mail from their pop server,
Firestarter notifies about traffic from 192.25.206.10 (from ports 32768 and above),
blocks it and after that the connection to my ISP freezes until I halt all traffic and
restart the firewall. Same happens when I fire
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Csillag Krist?f wrote:
>
> Soren Boll Overgaard pointed out that deleting the BCC fields from the
> mails sent to other recipients is not the mail client's responsibility.
> It should be done by the MTA.
Soren isn't entirely right. In practice its more sane for the MUA to
process, then remove, t
I also checked exim packages 3.35-1 and 3.36-4 (from woody and sid).
All versions exhibit the same behavior.
I also tried KMail. It works properly, using the same local sendmail
program.
So I guess Evolution is using exim's sendmail program incorrectly.
ps. If you see my name e-mail address in t
Hi,
On 18 Jan 2003 16:22:48 +0100, Csillag =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Krist=F3f?= writes:
>Soren Boll Overgaard pointed out that deleting the BCC fields from the
>mails sent to other recipients is not the mail client's responsibility.
>It should be done by the MTA.
> [...]
>So I guess this is a bug in the sen
Soren Boll Overgaard pointed out that deleting the BCC fields from the
mails sent to other recipients is not the mail client's responsibility.
It should be done by the MTA.
So it is not Evolution's fault.
I am using Exim 3.36-3 from Sarge.
Evolution is configured to use /usr/sbin/sendmail for s
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>When wil apache 1.3.27 be available for Debian Sarge ?
When it's ready.
packages.qa.debian.org shows it would have entered testing already if
it's dependancies were up to date. The dependances are glibc and expat.
Expat is ready, waiting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18 Jan 2003, Guenther Starnberger wrote:
> the last openldap upgrade (DSA-227-1) seems to break proftpd when using
> LDAP authentication with proftpd-ldap (at least on my i386 system).
>
> proftpd logs:
> Jan 18 11:51:07 osprey proftpd[349]: foo (b
Hi,
Jan H. van Gils écrivait :
> When wil apache 1.3.27 be available for Debian Sarge ?
> Can somebody please give me an answere on this question.
Probably the package maintainer:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache show apache | grep Maintainer
Maintainer: Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED
"Noah L. Meyerhans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
hello,
> Yes, 0.9.6c-2.woody.1. It contains all the security fixes present
> in openssl-0.9.6g.
the last openldap upgrade (DSA-227-1) seems to break proftpd when
using LDAP authentication with proftpd-ldap (at least on my i386
system).
proftpd lo
Well, it is a little bit offtopic, but it's a serious issue,
concerning the privacy of many of us, so I thought you might
be interested.
Ximian Evolution
Debian package version: 1.2.1-2
BCC Recipients ARE NOT HIDDEN from the other recipients of the message
!!!
http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show
Hi,
Thanks for reading.
When wil apache 1.3.27 be available for Debian Sarge ?
Can somebody please give me an answere on this question.
Greetz Jan
--
With regards Jan H. van Gils
Internet web-page http://www.VGNet.NL/
Internet e-mail address [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RIPE Whois JHG5-RIPE, 6BON
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>When wil apache 1.3.27 be available for Debian Sarge ?
When it's ready.
packages.qa.debian.org shows it would have entered testing already if
it's dependancies were up to date. The dependances are glibc and expat.
Expat is ready, waiting
Hi,
Jan H. van Gils écrivait :
> When wil apache 1.3.27 be available for Debian Sarge ?
> Can somebody please give me an answere on this question.
Probably the package maintainer:
progfou@virus:~$ apt-cache show apache | grep Maintainer
Maintainer: Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Noah L. Meyerhans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
hello,
> Yes, 0.9.6c-2.woody.1. It contains all the security fixes present
> in openssl-0.9.6g.
the last openldap upgrade (DSA-227-1) seems to break proftpd when
using LDAP authentication with proftpd-ldap (at least on my i386
system).
proftpd lo
Well, it is a little bit offtopic, but it's a serious issue,
concerning the privacy of many of us, so I thought you might
be interested.
Ximian Evolution
Debian package version: 1.2.1-2
BCC Recipients ARE NOT HIDDEN from the other recipients of the message
!!!
http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show
Hi,
Thanks for reading.
When wil apache 1.3.27 be available for Debian Sarge ?
Can somebody please give me an answere on this question.
Greetz Jan
--
With regards Jan H. van Gils
Internet web-page http://www.VGNet.NL/
Internet e-mail address [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RIPE Whois JHG5-RIPE, 6BON
32 matches
Mail list logo
