Csillag Krist?f wrote: > > Soren Boll Overgaard pointed out that deleting the BCC fields from the > mails sent to other recipients is not the mail client's responsibility. > It should be done by the MTA.
Soren isn't entirely right. In practice its more sane for the MUA to process, then remove, the Bcc field before sending the message, especially if the MUA will be speaking SMTP to send the message. > Evolution is configured to use /usr/sbin/sendmail for sending > out mails. Local injection adheres by no standard accross MTAs, but a reasonable thing for an injection program to do is to process and remove the Bcc field atleast in the case where the program is called without any arguments (the arguments being, traditionally, the addresses of the intended recipients). In many injection programs, the behavior that dictates how recipients are chosen is configurable. > If I configure it to use the SMTP server at localhost, it is working > properly. I wouldn't rely on that, if its not your MUA removing the Bcc you should be aware not all SMTP servers are going to remove that field for you. > So I guess this is a bug in the sendmail program in exim ?? Maybe, or maybe the proper flags simply aren't being passed to your local injection program to tell it to abide by the behavior you expect. -- Jamie Heilman http://audible.transient.net/~jamie/ "I was in love once -- a Sinclair ZX-81. People said, "No, Holly, she's not for you." She was cheap, she was stupid and she wouldn't load -- well, not for me, anyway." -Holly
