Re: NIS(Client && Server) + Security

> I have 3 machines, A, B and C. Machine A is my gateway,B my NIS, > mail and SMB server and machine C is my WorkStation. My doubt is if > is secure to have a NIS client on machine A or simple re-direct my > connections to machine B? Unless there's something you've not told us there's no reason

Re: NIS(Client && Server) + Security

> I have 3 machines, A, B and C. Machine A is my gateway,B my NIS, > mail and SMB server and machine C is my WorkStation. My doubt is if > is secure to have a NIS client on machine A or simple re-direct my > connections to machine B? Unless there's something you've not told us there's no reason

Re: Bind9 stopped after 34 days of uptime

Hi list, Here I am again and a happy newyear to all :) - Original message - On Wed, 25 Dec 2002 20:54:02 +0100 (CET) Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wed, 25 Dec 2002, J.Reilink wrote: > > > I've had exactly the same on our corperate primary nameserv

NIS(Client && Server) + Security

Greetings. I have 3 machines, A, B and C. Machine A is my gateway,B my NIS, mail and SMB server and machine C is my WorkStation. My doubt is if is secure to have a NIS client on machine A or simple re-direct my connections to machine B? I don't want to do the re-directions to machine C, because it

Re: gkrellm and security

On Thu, 02/01/2003 05:50 -0200, Bueno wrote: > I thought about the following idea: > > to install gkrellm and xterm in all the servers (altogether with 15 to > 20 >

Re: Bind9 stopped after 34 days of uptime

Hi list, Here I am again and a happy newyear to all :) - Original message - On Wed, 25 Dec 2002 20:54:02 +0100 (CET) Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wed, 25 Dec 2002, J.Reilink wrote: > > > I've had exactly the same on our corperate primary nameserv

NIS(Client && Server) + Security

Greetings. I have 3 machines, A, B and C. Machine A is my gateway,B my NIS, mail and SMB server and machine C is my WorkStation. My doubt is if is secure to have a NIS client on machine A or simple re-direct my connections to machine B? I don't want to do the re-directions to machine C, because it

Re: gkrellm and security

On Thu, 02/01/2003 05:50 -0200, Bueno wrote: > I thought about the following idea: > > to install gkrellm and xterm in all the servers (altogether with 15 to > 20 >

gkrellm and security

Hello people, Today I installed the gkrellm, and the gkrellmlaunch.so plug-in to start-up programs using the gkrellm... I think it's a great alternative (related to easy use) to monitor and manager remote servers... I intalled in some not-so critical servers on my network and I liked it a lot...

subscribe

Hello debian-security, -- Best regards, SKYRiDER mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: (SPAM?) Marginheight

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Not at this address Your message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] could not be delivered. Due to the large amounts of email with the SIRCAM virus to this address, we have terminated this account. Make sure you have the latest virus software and scan your PC for this virus.

gkrellm and security

Hello people, Today I installed the gkrellm, and the gkrellmlaunch.so plug-in to start-up programs using the gkrellm... I think it's a great alternative (related to easy use) to monitor and manager remote servers... I intalled in some not-so critical servers on my network and I liked it a lot...

subscribe

Hello debian-security, -- Best regards, SKYRiDER mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: (SPAM?) Marginheight

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Not at this address Your message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] could not be delivered. Due to the large amounts of email with the SIRCAM virus to this address, we have terminated this account. Make sure you have the latest virus software and scan your PC for this virus.