On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 11:32:10PM +, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> But well, if I run unstable and I find a strange problem with such an
> important package, I have to tell the debian community. I think that's
> one of the purpose of that mailing-list : knowing problems coming with the
> packages.
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 11:32:10PM +, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> But well, if I run unstable and I find a strange problem with such an
> important package, I have to tell the debian community. I think that's
> one of the purpose of that mailing-list : knowing problems coming with the
> packages
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 02:23:36PM +0200, Marcel Weber wrote:
> If you really want to use something, that's just for a little elite of
> specialists, why don't you use AIX, s390 or even better a little cray,
> to say one of this big irons...
S/390 is a hardware architecture, not an operating sy
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 11:13:06PM +0200, Lupe Christoph wrote:
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't we expect people who run unstable to
> diagnoseproblems themselves?
No, we don't. We hope people running unstable report any problems they run
into, so that information can be used to improve Deb
I fully agree.
NT servers should be "jailed" if not configured properly.
- Original Message -
From: "Curtis Ireland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Phillip Hofmeister" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Marcel Weber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 6:34 PM
Subject: Re: Bizarre apache
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rune Kristian Viken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ben wrote:
shove off, troll
>>> I'm not sure why you're calling me a troll, but I would appreciate
>>> it if you at least _attempted_ to be a tad more polite.
>> i'd appreciate it if you could at le
Phillip Hofmeister wrote:
A few words:
Lazy and/or ignorant system administrators. Then again...NT/2000 is so easy
that you don't have to be a good administrator to run a box...*sigh*
I don't completely agree on that remark. I run a hybrid network (I was
under orders, don't shoot me!) and if
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 02:23:36PM +0200, Marcel Weber wrote:
> If you really want to use something, that's just for a little elite of
> specialists, why don't you use AIX, s390 or even better a little cray,
> to say one of this big irons...
S/390 is a hardware architecture, not an operating s
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 11:13:06PM +0200, Lupe Christoph wrote:
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't we expect people who run unstable to
> diagnoseproblems themselves?
No, we don't. We hope people running unstable report any problems they run
into, so that information can be used to improve De
Received: from rams3.rasd.net (unknown [199.234.146.17])
by murphy.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 946FC1F415
for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2002 10:09:24 -0500
(CDT)
Received: from store12.cybercity.dk ([194.126.61.17]) by rams3.rasd.net with
Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329);
Mon, 7 Oct 2002 06:12:27 -0
Title: genericmailer.gif
This
message is an advertisement. We will continue to bring you valuable permission
based messages on the products and services that interest you most unless
you wish to decline.
We process all requests immediately. Brought to you by worl
I fully agree.
NT servers should be "jailed" if not configured properly.
- Original Message -
From: "Curtis Ireland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Phillip Hofmeister" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Marcel Weber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 6:34 PM
Subject
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rune Kristian Viken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ben wrote:
shove off, troll
>>> I'm not sure why you're calling me a troll, but I would appreciate
>>> it if you at least _attempted_ to be a tad more polite.
>> i'd appreciate it if you could at l
Phillip Hofmeister wrote:
> A few words:
>
> Lazy and/or ignorant system administrators. Then again...NT/2000 is so easy
> that you don't have to be a good administrator to run a box...*sigh*
>
I don't completely agree on that remark. I run a hybrid network (I was
under orders, don't shoot me!
Received: from rams3.rasd.net (unknown [199.234.146.17])
by murphy.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 946FC1F415
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 7 Oct 2002 10:09:24 -0500
(CDT)
Received: from store12.cybercity.dk ([194.126.61.17]) by rams3.rasd.net with
Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329);
Mon, 7
Title: genericmailer.gif
This
message is an advertisement. We will continue to bring you valuable permission
based messages on the products and services that interest you most unless
you wish to decline.
We process all requests immediately. Brought to you by worl
This will be the final mail from me to the debian-security list
answering ben. I'm sorry to have bored people with this drivel, but
he attacked me publically, and I responded. As Tim Haynes pointed
out, this does belong in private mail and not on list.
Ben wrote
>> [snip]
>> Eh? You sent me
mm all i'm going to say is it really seems like you have an attitude
problem Ben. Sorry rest of user list, I couldn't resist.
-Original Message-
From: ben
To: Rune Kristian Viken; debian-security@lists.debian.org; David Pastern
Sent: 7/10/2002 21:43
Subject: Re: Report on last cmd
O
Oi
You two. Sort it out offline once and for all, will you?
I've getting thoroughly pissed off with the debian-* mailing lists; a month
or two ago d-secure was actively pro-spam, now there's nothing but off-
topic crap.
Makes me wonder why I bother reading it, looking for things to respond to,
ma
On Monday 07 October 2002 04:14 am, Rune Kristian Viken wrote:
> Ben wrote:
> >>> shove off, troll
> >>
> >> I'm not sure why you're calling me a troll, but I would appreciate
> >> it if you at least _attempted_ to be a tad more polite.
> >
> > i'd appreciate it if you could at least be consistent
Ben wrote:
>>> shove off, troll
>> I'm not sure why you're calling me a troll, but I would appreciate
>> it if you at least _attempted_ to be a tad more polite.
> i'd appreciate it if you could at least be consistent in what you
> send to the list and to my address. the fact that there is an
> inco
This will be the final mail from me to the debian-security list
answering ben. I'm sorry to have bored people with this drivel, but
he attacked me publically, and I responded. As Tim Haynes pointed
out, this does belong in private mail and not on list.
Ben wrote
>> [snip]
>> Eh? You sent me
On Monday 07 October 2002 02:21 am, Rune Kristian Viken wrote:
> Monday, ben wrote:
> > shove off, troll
>
> Uh.. WHAT?
>
> I'm not sure why you're calling me a troll, but I would appreciate it
> if you at least _attempted_ to be a tad more polite.
i'd appreciate it if you could at least be consis
mm all i'm going to say is it really seems like you have an attitude
problem Ben. Sorry rest of user list, I couldn't resist.
-Original Message-
From: ben
To: Rune Kristian Viken; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; David Pastern
Sent: 7/10/2002 21:43
Subject: Re: Report on last cmd
On Monday 07 Oc
Oi
You two. Sort it out offline once and for all, will you?
I've getting thoroughly pissed off with the debian-* mailing lists; a month
or two ago d-secure was actively pro-spam, now there's nothing but off-
topic crap.
Makes me wonder why I bother reading it, looking for things to respond to,
m
Monday, ben wrote:
> shove off, troll
Uh.. WHAT?
I'm not sure why you're calling me a troll, but I would appreciate it
if you at least _attempted_ to be a tad more polite.
--
Rune Kristian Viken
On Monday 07 October 2002 04:14 am, Rune Kristian Viken wrote:
> Ben wrote:
> >>> shove off, troll
> >>
> >> I'm not sure why you're calling me a troll, but I would appreciate
> >> it if you at least _attempted_ to be a tad more polite.
> >
> > i'd appreciate it if you could at least be consistent
Ben wrote:
>>> shove off, troll
>> I'm not sure why you're calling me a troll, but I would appreciate
>> it if you at least _attempted_ to be a tad more polite.
> i'd appreciate it if you could at least be consistent in what you
> send to the list and to my address. the fact that there is an
> inc
On Monday 07 October 2002 02:21 am, Rune Kristian Viken wrote:
> Monday, ben wrote:
> > shove off, troll
>
> Uh.. WHAT?
>
> I'm not sure why you're calling me a troll, but I would appreciate it
> if you at least _attempted_ to be a tad more polite.
i'd appreciate it if you could at least be consi
shove off, troll
ben
Monday, ben wrote:
> shove off, troll
Uh.. WHAT?
I'm not sure why you're calling me a troll, but I would appreciate it
if you at least _attempted_ to be a tad more polite.
--
Rune Kristian Viken
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Fredag 4. oktober 2002 13:03 skreiv Glen Tapley:
> Hello
> I have been having a lot of trouble with my sendmail setup, someone
> is using my system. I have found that when I run the last cmd,
You're really not making much sense.
What kind of trouble with your sendmail setup?
'Someone' as in so
32 matches
Mail list logo
