Hi All,
I received the attached bug report on my snmpd package. Ordinarily, I
would fix it and upload a new version. The problem is that the
version in question (4.2.3) no longer provides the snmpd package since
it has been superceded by a major, new version (5.0.3). For testing
and unstable, t
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 03:00:59PM -0400, Sean McAvoy wrote:
> Hello,
> I've successfully configured site to site VPN connections using
> FreeSwan, RSA keys, and using our own Dynamic DNS server (gnudip). It's
> a straight forward tunnel connection. Couple of points
> left= and right= should be FQD
Hello,
I've successfully configured site to site VPN connections using
FreeSwan, RSA keys, and using our own Dynamic DNS server (gnudip). It's
a straight forward tunnel connection. Couple of points
left= and right= should be FQDNs, also uniqueids = yes is important, it
drops the old connection if a
Apparently it is possible with Firebox 2 using ipsec manual:
http://lists.freeswan.org/pipermail/users/2001-June/000566.html
On Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:05:23 +1000, Geoff Crompton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't remember, but does FreeSwan support specifying connections
> with domain names?
It does, but it seems to learn the ip address at startup and not bother to
look it up again before bringing up the connection
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 03:09:50PM -0700, Johannes Graumann wrote:
> # Checking accounts from /etc/passwd.
> --WARN-- [acc001w] Login ID nobody is disabled, but still has a valid
> shell (/bin/sh).
Debian specific. You could probably change the shell to /bin/false
> --WARN-- [acc006w] Login ID
Hi Marcel,
> Does anybody know if there are any news concerning freeswan and
> Watchguard Firebox 2 interoperability? Some time ago I read that the two
> would not work together, as Watchguard does not use triple DES during
> the negotiation phase. Is there a patch around for freeswan?
>
Th
7 matches
Mail list logo
