On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 03:09:50PM -0700, Johannes Graumann wrote:

> # Checking accounts from /etc/passwd.
> --WARN-- [acc001w] Login ID nobody is disabled, but still has a valid
> shell (/bin/sh). 

Debian specific. You could probably change the shell to /bin/false

> --WARN-- [acc006w] Login ID mail's home directory (/var/mail) has group
> `mail' write access. 

This is normal in any Debian setup and you should leave it as is.


> --WARN-- [acc006w] Login ID nobody's home directory (/home) has group
> `staff' write access.

This is also normal in Debian setups. However, you can change it if you do
not feel it's appropiate.

For some explanation regarding Tiger's issues see: tigexp.

> 
> I'm new to the business of system administration and not quite shure on
> how to react to this. A 'chmod'-variety for the first and last? Also: what
> is this 'nobody' user? Program/demon specific? Can I, should I get rid of
> it?

As for 

> 
> Tiger also complained that 
> /sbin/bastille-firewall-reset
> /sbin/bastille-firewall-schedule
> /sbin/bastille-ipchains
> /sbin/bastille-netfilter
> are not supposed to be present - but after 'bastille' setup they are
> supposed to be here. How do I teach this to tiger? I suppose it is doable
> with those 'templates'? Have found no documentation on what that is/how
> itworks/how to set it up and would greatly appreciate any hint concerning
> this.

Templates are easy to do, just copy any report from a module (available
under /var/log/tiger) into /etc/tiger (or /var/log/tiger but it's
deprecated) changing the .out prefix to .template. Remove all the lines
that you *want* to be reported about. The lines that are kept in the
template will *never* be reported.

AFAIK This is documented in tiger(8) (but maybe it's only in the 3.0
version in unstable). Also, keep in mind that the default behavior of
Tiger will be to *only* email you the changes after a given module has
been run (like if the previous run was the template for the next). This
makes it easier to detect changes.

Hope you like it!

        Javi

Reply via email to