Wichert,
Where might I find this?
Regards,
Alex.
---
PGP/GPG Fingerprint:
EFD1 AC6C 7ED5 E453 C367 AC7A B474 16E0 758D 7ED9
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.12
GCM d- s:+ a--- C UL P L+++ E W++ N o-- K- w
O--- M- V- PS+ PE- Y PGP t+ 5 X- R tv+ b DI--- D+
G e-- h++ r--- y
-
Wichert,
Where might I find this?
Regards,
Alex.
---
PGP/GPG Fingerprint:
EFD1 AC6C 7ED5 E453 C367 AC7A B474 16E0 758D 7ED9
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.12
GCM d- s:+ a--- C UL P L+++ E W++ N o-- K- w
O--- M- V- PS+ PE- Y PGP t+ 5 X- R tv+ b DI--- D+
G e-- h++ r--- y
At 22:40 14/06/2000, Zak Kipling wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jun 2000, Sebastian Rittau wrote:
>> [stuff about encrypted SMB passwords]
>
> But using this option prevents you from using the global /etc/shadow
> file, which is problematic in some cases.
True. Samba has a "password sync" option to enable S
On Wed, Jun 14, 2000 at 02:10:09PM +0100, Zak Kipling wrote:
> I'm no PAM or SMB expert, but I would imagine (if it hasn't been done) it
> would be feasible to make a stacked "password" module to do the reverse,
> ie to update the SMB password (including optionally creating the entry in
> the smbp
At 22:40 14/06/2000, Zak Kipling wrote:
>On Wed, 14 Jun 2000, Sebastian Rittau wrote:
>
> >> [stuff about encrypted SMB passwords]
> >
> > But using this option prevents you from using the global /etc/shadow
> > file, which is problematic in some cases.
>
>True. Samba has a "password sync" option
On Wed, Jun 14, 2000 at 02:43:07PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Thomas Guettler wrote:
> > I am in the same position. I have got some time left which
> > I could spent in an opensource project. Nearly all
> > things I dream of are already working.
>
> A good free reimplementation o
On Wed, 14 Jun 2000, Sebastian Rittau wrote:
>> [stuff about encrypted SMB passwords]
>
> But using this option prevents you from using the global /etc/shadow
> file, which is problematic in some cases.
True. Samba has a "password sync" option to enable SMB password changes to
automatically updat
Previously Alexander Hvostov wrote:
> I have a better idea: an integrated 'user' command, which uses plugins to
> access the actual database server (like PAM, but for writing to the
> database rather than reading from it), and performs any of several
> functions.
PNIAM might alreadyh do this, I ha
Previously Thomas Guettler wrote:
> I am in the same position. I have got some time left which
> I could spent in an opensource project. Nearly all
> things I dream of are already working.
A good free reimplementation of portsentry is something I would really
like to see. Right now portsentry wor
On Wed, Jun 14, 2000 at 02:10:09PM +0100, Zak Kipling wrote:
> I'm no PAM or SMB expert, but I would imagine (if it hasn't been done) it
> would be feasible to make a stacked "password" module to do the reverse,
> ie to update the SMB password (including optionally creating the entry in
> the smb
On Tue, Jun 13, 2000 at 03:46:12PM -0700, Ryan White wrote:
> As I recall after windows 95 the passwords are sent over the line
> encrypted. The encryption might be weak but they are not clear text
> anymore.
> There is a switch in SMB to allow encrypted passwords. This is ON by
> default in deb
On Wed, Jun 14, 2000 at 02:43:07PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Thomas Guettler wrote:
> > I am in the same position. I have got some time left which
> > I could spent in an opensource project. Nearly all
> > things I dream of are already working.
>
> A good free reimplementation
On Wed, 14 Jun 2000, Sebastian Rittau wrote:
>> [stuff about encrypted SMB passwords]
>
> But using this option prevents you from using the global /etc/shadow
> file, which is problematic in some cases.
True. Samba has a "password sync" option to enable SMB password changes to
automatically upda
Previously Alexander Hvostov wrote:
> I have a better idea: an integrated 'user' command, which uses plugins to
> access the actual database server (like PAM, but for writing to the
> database rather than reading from it), and performs any of several
> functions.
PNIAM might alreadyh do this, I h
Previously Thomas Guettler wrote:
> I am in the same position. I have got some time left which
> I could spent in an opensource project. Nearly all
> things I dream of are already working.
A good free reimplementation of portsentry is something I would really
like to see. Right now portsentry wo
On Tue, Jun 13, 2000 at 03:46:12PM -0700, Ryan White wrote:
> As I recall after windows 95 the passwords are sent over the line
> encrypted. The encryption might be weak but they are not clear text
> anymore.
> There is a switch in SMB to allow encrypted passwords. This is ON by
> default in de
> > and
> > - Pro active security sourcecode reading/fixing, like what the OpenBSD
> > people do.
>
> I wanted to start a project like that a while back. I examined
> the OpenBSD patches to try to figure out exactly what they looked for.
> Unfortunately, between school and jobs, i haven't had the
On Wed, Jun 14, 2000 at 09:23:54AM +0200, L. Besselink wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jun 2000, Thomas Guettler wrote:
> If you ask me personally what things in Linux and/or Debian are most
> needed ? Those are two things:
>
> - I/O performance. Linux just doesn't have as good an I/O performance as
> the BSD
Lennie,
There's all sorts of interesting tweaks you can do to Linux to fine-tune
its network behavior via /proc. I suggest you look into it.
Regards,
Alex.
---
PGP/GPG Fingerprint:
EFD1 AC6C 7ED5 E453 C367 AC7A B474 16E0 758D 7ED9
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.12
GCM d- s:+ a--
On Wed, 14 Jun 2000, Alexander Hvostov wrote:
> Lennie,
>
> Can you give me any more details than just that Linux I/O performance is
> inferior to *BSD?
not much :/
All I can show is from my own experience.
Some time ago, I 'replaced' my home firewall 486 Debian installation with
OpenBSD (just
Lennie,
Can you give me any more details than just that Linux I/O performance is
inferior to *BSD?
Regards,
Alex.
---
PGP/GPG Fingerprint:
EFD1 AC6C 7ED5 E453 C367 AC7A B474 16E0 758D 7ED9
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.12
GCM d- s:+ a--- C UL P L+++ E W++ N o-- K- w
O--
On Tue, 13 Jun 2000, Thomas Guettler wrote:
> I am in the same position. I have got some time left which
> I could spent in an opensource project. Nearly all
> things I dream of are already working.
> So that I don't know where to join.
> And Mozilla ist too big.
> And like Florian I am intereste
> > and
> > - Pro active security sourcecode reading/fixing, like what the OpenBSD
> > people do.
>
> I wanted to start a project like that a while back. I examined
> the OpenBSD patches to try to figure out exactly what they looked for.
> Unfortunately, between school and jobs, i haven't had the
On Wed, Jun 14, 2000 at 09:23:54AM +0200, L. Besselink wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jun 2000, Thomas Guettler wrote:
> If you ask me personally what things in Linux and/or Debian are most
> needed ? Those are two things:
>
> - I/O performance. Linux just doesn't have as good an I/O performance as
> the BS
Lennie,
There's all sorts of interesting tweaks you can do to Linux to fine-tune
its network behavior via /proc. I suggest you look into it.
Regards,
Alex.
---
PGP/GPG Fingerprint:
EFD1 AC6C 7ED5 E453 C367 AC7A B474 16E0 758D 7ED9
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.12
GCM d- s:+ a-
On Wed, 14 Jun 2000, Alexander Hvostov wrote:
> Lennie,
>
> Can you give me any more details than just that Linux I/O performance is
> inferior to *BSD?
not much :/
All I can show is from my own experience.
Some time ago, I 'replaced' my home firewall 486 Debian installation with
OpenBSD (jus
Lennie,
Can you give me any more details than just that Linux I/O performance is
inferior to *BSD?
Regards,
Alex.
---
PGP/GPG Fingerprint:
EFD1 AC6C 7ED5 E453 C367 AC7A B474 16E0 758D 7ED9
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.12
GCM d- s:+ a--- C UL P L+++ E W++ N o-- K- w
O-
On Tue, 13 Jun 2000, Thomas Guettler wrote:
> I am in the same position. I have got some time left which
> I could spent in an opensource project. Nearly all
> things I dream of are already working.
> So that I don't know where to join.
> And Mozilla ist too big.
> And like Florian I am interest
28 matches
Mail list logo
