On 12 December 2017 at 21:58, Pierre Saramito wrote:
>> I think the thing to do here is reassign this bug to src:boost1.62 and
>> mark that it affects src:rheolef.
>
> Do you known how to do that with the Debian bug system ?
You can send mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org to manipulate bugs [1].
In
Hi Dear,
how are you today I hope that everything is OK with you as it is my great
pleasure to contact you in having communication with you starting from today, i
was just going through the Internet search when i found your email address, I
want to make a very new and special friend, so i dec
Tienes una factura sin pagar
Generado el: 12/12/2017
Factura #3389790
Descarga la factura con el enlace
Source: pysph
Version: 0~20160514.git91867dc-4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: kernel
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
Whilst working on the Reproducible Builds effort [0], we noticed
that pysph could not be bui
Hi Graham,
> Would you please quote the bug number? I failed to find your bug report.
Here is the bug report:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=884185
Hummm... I just realize now that I have do a mistake and assign this bug
to libcgal-dev instead of libboost-dev package when
On 2017-12-12 20:26, Graham Inggs wrote:
> Would you please quote the bug number? I failed to find your bug report.
>
> I think the thing to do here is reassign this bug to src:boost1.62 and
> mark that it affects src:rheolef.
just saw these (against cgal) in my buster RC udd query: #884184 #884
Hi Pierre
(cc-ing Andreas in case he is not subscribed)
On 12 December 2017 at 15:13, Pierre Saramito wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> This problem do neither comes from Rheolef-6.7 nor from CGAL-4.11:
> it comes from Boost-1.62 combined with g++ 7.2 in Debian sid and testing.
>
> The bug has already be
binary:libignition-cmake-dev is NEW.
binary:libignition-cmake-dev is NEW.
source:ignition-cmake is NEW.
Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid)
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 19:42:46 +0100
Source: arpack++
Binary: libarpack++2-dev libarpack++2c2a
Architecture: source
Version: 2.3-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Science Team
Changed-By: Anton Gl
arpack++_2.3-8_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
arpack++_2.3-8.dsc
arpack++_2.3-8.debian.tar.xz
arpack++_2.3-8_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing list
ignition-cmake_0.2.0-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ignition-cmake_0.2.0-1.dsc
ignition-cmake_0.2.0.orig.tar.bz2
ignition-cmake_0.2.0-1.debian.tar.xz
ignition-cmake_0.2.0-1_amd64.buildinfo
libignition-cmake-dev_0.2.0-1_amd64.deb
Greetings,
Hi Gudjon,
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 06:58:10AM +0100, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
> I'm terribly sorry for having missed the bug.
> There is a new version in SVN (27) that is not fully prepared but will
> be in the next few days. If somebody is willing to sponsor it I will be
> very happy.
>
> And
Hi Andreas,
This problem do neither comes from Rheolef-6.7 nor from CGAL-4.11:
it comes from Boost-1.62 combined with g++ 7.2 in Debian sid and testing.
The bug has already be identified in the upstream version of Boost :
https://svn.boost.org/trac10/ticket/12534
and it is now fixed in the upst
Good day,
Thank you for taking the time.
I am Angela Liu, I got your contact via Linkedin. Would it be convenient
for you to be available for a proposition discussion?
I look forward to hearing from you at your convenience.
--
Best Regards,
Ms Angela Liu
Head of Operations
Standard Charte
My dear greetings to you,
I crave your indulgence at this mail coming from somebody you have not known
before. I decided to do this after praying over the situation. You should
please consider the transaction on its content and not the fact that you have
not known me before. I need not dwell o
15 matches
Mail list logo
