Bug#741131: Fwd: Bug#741131: nonfree file in source

Dear Dimitris, 2014-03-11 6:31 GMT+04:00 Δημήτρης Ευταξιόπουλος : > Hello Alexey, > I would suggest option (1) i.e replace the file with its source(s). > I see. I'll try to replace sylvester.js by it source(s). > For the version 2.2.2 package I intend to create a patch and remove > json/sylves

Bug#741131: Fwd: Bug#741131: nonfree file in source

Hello Alexey, I would suggest option (1) i.e replace the file with its source(s). For the version 2.2.2 package I intend to create a patch and remove json/sylvester.js from the source. Best regards Dimitris Στις Τρι 11 Μαρ 2014 05:49:09 γράψατε: > As continuation of previous e-mail. > > 4. You

Bug#741303: libfeel++1: libfeelpp.so.1.0.0 links with both GPL-licensed and GPL-incompatible libraries

Package: libfeel++1 Version: 1:0.95.0-final-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.3 User: debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: scotch-license-issues Hello, the library /usr/lib/libfeelpp.so.1.0.0 links with: => libumfpack.so.5.6.2, which is under the GNU GPL v2 or

Bug#741131: Fwd: Bug#741131: nonfree file in source

Dear Alexey, Le dimanche 09 mars 2014 à 21:14 +0400, Alexey Balakin a écrit : > it is source file itself, distributed under MIT license (see > http://sylvester.jcoglan.com/) json/sylvester.js is a minified javascript file. It is not source code because it is not the preferred form of modificati

Your message to Scummvm-devel awaits moderator approval

Your mail to 'Scummvm-devel' with the subject [SPAM] 2ª via Boleto. Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. The reason it is being held: Post by non-member to a members-only list Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive notification

Your message to Tuxmath-devel awaits moderator approval

Your mail to 'Tuxmath-devel' with the subject [SPAM] 2ª via Boleto. Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. The reason it is being held: Post by non-member to a members-only list Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive notification

minieigen_0.41~dfsg~bzr51~exp1-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 19:38:02 +0100 Source: minieigen Binary: python-minieigen Architecture: source amd64 Version: 0.41~dfsg~bzr51~exp1-1 Distribution: experimental Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers Cha

Processing of minieigen_0.41~dfsg~bzr51~exp1-1_amd64.changes

minieigen_0.41~dfsg~bzr51~exp1-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: minieigen_0.41~dfsg~bzr51~exp1-1.dsc minieigen_0.41~dfsg~bzr51~exp1.orig.tar.xz minieigen_0.41~dfsg~bzr51~exp1-1.debian.tar.xz python-minieigen_0.41~dfsg~bzr51~exp1-1_amd64.deb Greeting

Re: Trilinos packages

> Did you repack it? Nope. For creating the printine-tar branch, I used the --git-pristine-tar option as described on https://wiki.debian.org/PackagingWithGit#pristine-tar. --Nico On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Anton Gladky wrote: > 2014-03-10 16:25 GMT+01:00 Nico Schlömer : > >> > It seems,

Re: Trilinos packages

> E: dh_python2:145: extension for python2.6 is missing. Build extensions for > all supported Python versions (`pyversions -vr`) or adjust X-Python-Version > field or pass --no-guessing-versions to dh_python2 I added override_dh_python2: dh_python2 --no-guessing-versions to debian/rules. T

Re: Trilinos packages

2014-03-10 16:25 GMT+01:00 Nico Schlömer : > > It seems, the checksum of tarball on the website and > > in pristine-tar branch is not the same. > > So what to do about this? > Did you repack it? Anton -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

Re: Trilinos packages

> Hi Nico, is it possible to have working debian/watch? Not right now. Sandia currently doesn't do public ftp reads. They are in the process of switching to their new site trilinos.org right now, and I already requested a public ftp list to be added alongside. Once this is done, I'll adapt debian/

Bug#248426: Please Act Fast!!

Please Open The Attachment. HELP DESK.rtf Description: RTF file -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re: Trilinos packages

On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 01:51:24PM +0100, Nico Schlömer wrote: > I checked all other dependencies manually and found that > libparmetis-dev was the only thing from non-free. I removed it from > the list; please retry building. the build succeeded without the ENABLE_ParMETIS switch (takes forever..

gringo 4.3.0-1 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the gringo source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 4.2.1-4 Current version: 4.3.0-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive

clasp 3.0.1-1 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the clasp source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 2.1.4-1 Current version: 3.0.1-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive l

oce 0.15-4 MIGRATED to testing

FYI: The status of the oce source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.15-3 Current version: 0.15-4 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later

Re: Trilinos packages

Hi Nico, is it possible to have working debian/watch? It seems, the checksum of tarball on the website and in pristine-tar branch is not the same. Anton 2014-03-10 13:51 GMT+01:00 Nico Schlömer : > I checked all other dependencies manually and found that > libparmetis-dev was the only thing fr

Re: Trilinos packages

I checked all other dependencies manually and found that libparmetis-dev was the only thing from non-free. I removed it from the list; please retry building. --Nico On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Nico Schlömer wrote: >> my recommendation is to disable parmetis in trilinos and defer the >> pro

cpl-plugin-kmos_1.3.0+dfsg-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 11:16:47 +0100 Source: cpl-plugin-kmos Binary: cpl-plugin-kmos cpl-plugin-kmos-doc cpl-plugin-kmos-calib Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 1.3.0+dfsg-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer

Processing of cpl-plugin-kmos_1.3.0+dfsg-1_amd64.changes

cpl-plugin-kmos_1.3.0+dfsg-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: cpl-plugin-kmos_1.3.0+dfsg-1.dsc cpl-plugin-kmos_1.3.0+dfsg.orig.tar.xz cpl-plugin-kmos_1.3.0+dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz cpl-plugin-kmos-doc_1.3.0+dfsg-1_all.deb cpl-plugin-kmos-calib_1.3.0+dfsg-

Processing of feel++_0.97.0-beta.1-1_amd64.changes

feel++_0.97.0-beta.1-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: feel++_0.97.0-beta.1-1.dsc feel++_0.97.0-beta.1.orig.tar.gz feel++_0.97.0-beta.1-1.debian.tar.xz feel++-doc_0.97.0-beta.1-1_all.deb libfeel++1_0.97.0-beta.1-1_amd64.deb libfeel++-dev_0.97.0-bet

feel++_0.97.0-beta.1-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2014 20:32:12 + Source: feel++ Binary: libfeel++1 libfeel++-dev libfeel++-dbg feel++-apps feel++-doc Architecture: source all amd64 Version: 1:0.97.0-beta.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer

Processing of adolc_2.5.0-3_amd64.changes

adolc_2.5.0-3_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: adolc_2.5.0-3.dsc adolc_2.5.0-3.debian.tar.xz libadolc-dev_2.5.0-3_amd64.deb libadolc2_2.5.0-3_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- debian-science

Processing of starlink-ast_7.3.4+dfsg-1_amd64.changes

starlink-ast_7.3.4+dfsg-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: starlink-ast_7.3.4+dfsg-1.dsc starlink-ast_7.3.4+dfsg.orig.tar.gz starlink-ast_7.3.4+dfsg-1.debian.tar.xz libstarlink-ast-dev_7.3.4+dfsg-1_amd64.deb libstarlink-ast0_7.3.4+dfsg-1_amd64.deb l

Re: Trilinos packages

> my recommendation is to disable parmetis in trilinos and defer the > problem until anybody actually requires it. Sure, why not. > how many (license) problems are left without parmetis? Not sure. If you build without parmetis (remove the dependency from debian/control and debian/rules), does th

adolc_2.5.0-3_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 10:14:15 + Source: adolc Binary: libadolc-dev libadolc2 Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2.5.0-3 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers Changed-By: Barak A.

starlink-ast_7.3.4+dfsg-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 10:34:04 +0100 Source: starlink-ast Binary: libstarlink-ast-dev libstarlink-ast0 libstarlink-ast-grf3d0 libstarlink-ast-err0 libstarlink-ast-doc Architecture: source amd64 all Version: 7.3.4+dfsg-1 Distr

Re: Trilinos packages

On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 11:33:26AM +0100, Nico Schlömer wrote: > Are there general Debian guidelines for such situations? i'm sorry i don't know or care. i'm not even sure in which way non-free is (not) a part of debian. > What's your opinion on this? imo it's best to avoid trouble (here: non-fr

Re: Trilinos packages

I see that ParMETIS is free for educational purposes only , so requiring it as a dependency makes Trilinos installable for edu-only as well. ParMETIS is optional to Trilinos so I might as well removed it without major repercussions. Are ther

Re: Trilinos packages

On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 10:52:19AM +0100, Nico Schlömer wrote: > Strange, libparmetis-dev should be in jessie, cf. > . indeed it is, and i missed that. curiously, parmetis is non-free, and that is why i missed it. from my understanding (to some

Re: Trilinos packages

Strange, libparmetis-dev should be in jessie, cf. . --Nico On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Felix Salfelder wrote: > On Sat, Mar 08, 2014 at 12:39:57AM +0100, Nico Schlömer wrote: >> > 1) Set VCS=fields >> > 2) Standards-Version is 3.9.5 now >

Re: Trilinos packages

On Sat, Mar 08, 2014 at 12:39:57AM +0100, Nico Schlömer wrote: > > 1) Set VCS=fields > > 2) Standards-Version is 3.9.5 now > > 3) Use DEP-3 for patches (Description, Author, Last-Updates is enough) > > 4) Remove some unnecessary comments from debian/rules. > > It should be as short as possible.

Bug#741156: src:mathgl: please reintroduce octave interface

Package: src:mathgl Version: 2.2.1+svn921-1 Severity: wishlist Control: block -1 by 736393 The octave interface was removed in version 2.2.1+svn921-1, because it was causing the package to FTBFS (see #741110). The problem actually comes from a bug in swig2.0, which I mark as blocking the present

Processed: src:mathgl: please reintroduce octave interface

Processing control commands: > block -1 by 736393 Bug #741156 [src:mathgl] src:mathgl: please reintroduce octave interface 741156 was not blocked by any bugs. 741156 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 741156: 736393 -- 741156: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=741

Bug#741110: marked as done (mathgl: FTBFS: invalid covariant return type for 'virtual Octave_map octave_swig_type::map_value() const')

Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2014 12:32:04 +0100 with message-id <1394364724.9447.20.ca...@rama.villemot.name> and subject line Re: Bug#741110: mathgl: FTBFS: invalid covariant return type for 'virtual Octave_map octave_swig_type::map_value() const' has caused the Debian Bug report #741110, rega

Bug#741165: libdolfin1.3: libdolfin.so.1.3.0 links with both GPL-licensed and GPL-incompatible libraries

Package: libdolfin1.3 Version: 1.3.0+dfsg-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.3 User: debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: scotch-license-issues Hello, the library /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdolfin.so.1.3.0 links with: => libumfpack.so.5.6.2, which is under the

Bug#738735: linop: FTBFS: dh_sphinxdoc: Sphinx documentation not found

On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 01:39:00PM +, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: > Could you provide the detailed steps to reproduce this bug. I have > only tested the build locally on my machine via pbuilder prior to > submitting the package and it went fine. If you look at https://buildd.debian.org/status/pac

Bug#738735: linop: FTBFS: dh_sphinxdoc: Sphinx documentation not found

Builds of linop covering only its architecture-dependent binary packages and skipping its architecture-independent -doc package (as on the autobuilders) have been faiing: dh_sphinxdoc -a -O--buildsystem=pybuild dh_sphinxdoc: Sphinx documentation not found make: *** [binary-arch] Error 2

Bug#741172: libslepc3.4.2: libslepc.so.3.4.2 links with both GPL-licensed and GPL-incompatible libraries

Package: libslepc3.4.2 Version: 3.4.2.dfsg-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.3 User: debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: scotch-license-issues Hello, the library /usr/lib/libslepc.so.3.4.2 links with: => libumfpack.so.5.6.2, which is under the GNU GPL v2 or la

Bug#741196: libpetsc3.4.2: libpetsc.so.3.4.2 links with both GPL-licensed and GPL-incompatible libraries

Package: libpetsc3.4.2 Version: 3.4.2.dfsg1-6 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.3 User: debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: scotch-license-issues Hello, the library /usr/lib/libpetsc.so.3.4.2 links with: => libumfpack.so.5.6.2, which is under the GNU GPL v2 or l

Bug#741204: getdp is GPL-licensed, but links with both GPL-licensed and GPL-incompatible libraries

Package: getdp Version: 2.4.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.3 User: debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: scotch-license-issues Hello, the program /usr/bin/getdp is under the GNU GPL v2 (only? or later? the debian/copyright is not too clear on this aspect) and

Bug#741131: Fwd: Re: Fwd: Bug#741131: nonfree file in source

--- Begin Message --- Dear Dimitris, it is source file itself, distributed under MIT license (see http://sylvester.jcoglan.com/) On 09.03.2014 21:06, Δημήτρης Ευταξιόπουλος wrote: Hello Alexey, could you please remove json/sylvester.js during a future SVN update since I received the attached

Re: Bug#728085: Pyfftw does not build

Hi erveryone, The latest update of PyFFTW now builds nicely with pbuilder and is ready for review. All the previously reported issues are now fixed. Ghis 2014-02-14 9:45 GMT+00:00 Ghislain Vaillant : > Quick update on my progress: > > - Build does not work for python 3.4, but 3.3 is fine. I ha

Placez a 7% net minimum ...

http://stats.fidelite.bro39.com//m/Xi6zDnS1Wx9I0UqrCrrXGJSt0tkn_2bOGdfNJIK0o8A_2fJBLf6c13xI6gFbZrKfyvIwGob9XsENJMAOI_2f9FiAKRaFpa0R3Zz_2bVIG2SiCw6a29w_3d/i.htm http://stats.fidelite.bro39.com//ur/Xi6zDnS1Wx9I0UqrCrrXGJSt0tkn_2bOGdfNJIK0o8A_2fJBLf6c13xI6gFbZrKfyvIwGob9XsENJMAOI_2f9FiAKRaFpa0R3Zz_2b