Re: salsa ci pipelines that run on schedule

2024-12-14 Thread Ananthu C V
Hello, On Sun, Dec 01, 2024 at 02:45:36PM +0530, Ananthu C V wrote: > The packages I have noticed that have this behaviour are: > - nadoka > - ruby-sigdump > - ruby-rspec-instafail > - ruby-childprocess > - ruby-flexmock > - ruby-parallel-tests > - ruby-serverengine (0 7 * * *) > - ruby-strptime >

Re: salsa ci pipelines that run on schedule

2024-12-04 Thread Soren Stoutner
On Wednesday, December 4, 2024 12:29:48 PM MST Ananthu C V wrote: > So I come to the conclusion that we should just drop them, and I am fine > with being the person to do it as the one who brought it up. If Hideki-san > has problems with that and expresses the same later, I can volunteer to put > t

Re: salsa ci pipelines that run on schedule

2024-12-04 Thread Ananthu C V
On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 10:37:14AM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Sure. I'm also fine with dropping the scheduled runs entirely. But it > was not me who put them in place. :-) The whole reason I started this discussion was also this, instead of just dropping them. But, on the other hand I only f

Re: salsa ci pipelines that run on schedule

2024-12-04 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 07:12:18AM -0300, Lucas Kanashiro wrote: > I understand what you said but in this case we would have Debci > blocking the migration to testing, which will avoid any issue to our > users anyway. The maintainer/uploader of the package causing the issue > will notice at some po

Re: salsa ci pipelines that run on schedule

2024-12-04 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Hi, > Em 2 de dez. de 2024, à(s) 17:53, Antonio Terceiro > escreveu: > > On Sun, Dec 01, 2024 at 02:45:36PM +0530, Ananthu C V wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I write this mail to ponder about something that has been bugging me since >> a long time now. If any of you follow the #debian-ruby-changes ir

Re: salsa ci pipelines that run on schedule

2024-12-02 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sun, Dec 01, 2024 at 02:45:36PM +0530, Ananthu C V wrote: > Hello, > > I write this mail to ponder about something that has been bugging me since > a long time now. If any of you follow the #debian-ruby-changes irc channel, > you'd have noticed the recurring ci results of a few select packages.

Re: salsa ci pipelines that run on schedule

2024-12-01 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Hi, On 01/12/2024 06:15, Ananthu C V wrote: Hello, I write this mail to ponder about something that has been bugging me since a long time now. If any of you follow the #debian-ruby-changes irc channel, you'd have noticed the recurring ci results of a few select packages. At first I thought this