On 05/12/15 12:46, Sebastian Boehm wrote:
> Hi Matijs,
>
> On 5 December 2015 at 12:38, Matijs van Zuijlen wrote:
>> Unfortunately, it seems none of the CRubies will build unpatched on current
>> Debian Sid, even those from the 2.2 series (though I haven't checked all of
>> them). It may make sen
Hi Matijs,
On 5 December 2015 at 12:38, Matijs van Zuijlen wrote:
> Unfortunately, it seems none of the CRubies will build unpatched on current
> Debian Sid, even those from the 2.2 series (though I haven't checked all of
> them). It may make sense to at least provide the appropriate patches as p
On 05/12/15 11:23, Sebastian Boehm wrote:
> On 5 December 2015 at 02:54, Adam Baxter wrote:
>> * debian-stable may need a version bump to fix #701918 (or it might be able
>> to be closed?)
>
> I haven't had the time to write a mail explaining this properly, but
> this is probably a WONTFIX issue.
Hi Adam,
On 5 December 2015 at 11:30, Adam Baxter wrote:
> zeha on #debian-ruby ended up doing this for me - looks like I was pretty
> close
great, thanks for the help!
Could you also make sure to update the manpage to document changes in
ruby-build, please? (It would be good to have an up-to-d
>
>
> On 5 December 2015 at 02:54, Adam Baxter wrote:
> > * It'd be nice to get a newer version into Debian
>
> importing a newer version of ruby-build is mainly an issue of updating
> the manpage. I have to admit that I don't use ruby-build too often
> anymore. The Debian Ruby packages are fairly
Hi Adam,
On 5 December 2015 at 02:54, Adam Baxter wrote:
> * It'd be nice to get a newer version into Debian
importing a newer version of ruby-build is mainly an issue of updating
the manpage. I have to admit that I don't use ruby-build too often
anymore. The Debian Ruby packages are fairly up-t
6 matches
Mail list logo
