Re: RFS: sup-mail 0.12-1+git20120407.aaa852f-1

2012-05-28 Thread Cédric Boutillier
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 09:05:47AM -0700, Clint Byrum wrote: > Excerpts from Cédric Boutillier's message of 2012-05-27 23:32:41 -0700: > > > Thanks! You've addressed all my concerns. This version of sup-mail is > > working > > very well, and I am using it to answer right now. I believe it can go i

Re: RFS: sup-mail 0.12-1+git20120407.aaa852f-1

2012-05-28 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Cédric Boutillier's message of 2012-05-27 23:32:41 -0700: > Hi! > > Excerpts from Per Andersson's message of sam. mai 26 00:56:52 +0200 2012: > > > > I managed to fix this. See [0] for the trivial fix. Please review and > > try it out. > > > > [0] > > http://anonscm.debian.org/git

Re: RFS: sup-mail 0.12-1+git20120407.aaa852f-1

2012-05-27 Thread Cédric Boutillier
Hi! Excerpts from Per Andersson's message of sam. mai 26 00:56:52 +0200 2012: > > I managed to fix this. See [0] for the trivial fix. Please review and > try it out. > > [0] > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-ruby-extras/sup-mail.git;a=commit;h=39c5d26a8e918c498f178b98dd5fff1c47335c3b >

Re: RFS: sup-mail 0.12-1+git20120407.aaa852f-1

2012-05-25 Thread Per Andersson
Hi! On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Per Andersson wrote: > Hi! > > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Per Andersson wrote: >> Hi! >> >> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Cédric Boutillier >> wrote: >>> >>> - Trying to expand a signature in the thread view mode yields a crash >>>  with the follo

Re: RFS: sup-mail 0.12-1+git20120407.aaa852f-1

2012-05-25 Thread Per Andersson
Hi! On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Per Andersson wrote: > Hi! > > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Cédric Boutillier > wrote: >> >> I encountered two issues with sup-mail with respect to GPG support: >> - Although I could send signed emails, I could not send encrypted / >>  encrypted and sign

Re: RFS: sup-mail 0.12-1+git20120407.aaa852f-1

2012-05-24 Thread Per Andersson
Hi! On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > Hi! > > I've built successfully the package, and managed to use it to read my > emails. It works quite nicely. Neat! > I have no comments about the packaging > (except I don't think that the debian/sup-mail.install file is needed,

Re: RFS: sup-mail 0.12-1+git20120407.aaa852f-1

2012-05-23 Thread Cédric Boutillier
Hi! I've built successfully the package, and managed to use it to read my emails. It works quite nicely. I have no comments about the packaging (except I don't think that the debian/sup-mail.install file is needed, since the files in bin/ are automatically moved there by gem2deb). I encountered t