Marc Dequènes (Duck) escreveu isso aí:
> Quoting Lucas Nussbaum :
> >I think it's OK to upload with the duplicate file, and open an RC bug
> >against ruby-builder. For the others, it's a smaller issue since the
> >private copy doesn't conflict.
>
> Let's do this.
Ok. I've just uploaded ruby-blank
Marc Dequènes (Duck) escreveu isso aí:
> Coin,
>
> Quoting Lucas Nussbaum :
>
> >On 04/01/12 at 19:41 -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> >>The correct solution is to make ruby-builder drop it's embedded copy of
> >>blankslate and depend on it instead. Ideally all the other embedded
> >>copies shoul
Hi Antonio,
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 06:45:50PM -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> I guess the intentation was to keep the license, but unless that license
> is replicated in the new package, all we can assume is what's written in
> the blankslate.rb header.
Ok, I will update the copyright field to
Cédric Boutillier escreveu isso aí:
> Just a short question, while I am at it: blankslate.rb is extracted from
> Builder, released under the MIT(Expat) license. The blankslate project
> does not mention any license explicitely, expect the header of
> blankslate.rb:
> All right reserved.
> .
> Pe
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 07:41:16PM -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> Cédric Boutillier escreveu isso aí:
> > Thanks Antonio. I forgot to check for conflicts :(
> > I am now making ruby-blankslate conflict with ruby-builder, and I
> > propose the alternative ruby-blankslate | ruby-builder for
> > (bu
On 01/05/2012 01:20 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 04/01/12 at 17:22 -0500, Sam Ruby wrote:
On 01/04/2012 04:41 PM, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
The correct solution is to make ruby-builder drop it's embedded copy of
blankslate and depend on it instead. Ideally all the other embedded
copies should al
On 04/01/12 at 17:22 -0500, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On 01/04/2012 04:41 PM, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> >
> >The correct solution is to make ruby-builder drop it's embedded copy of
> >blankslate and depend on it instead. Ideally all the other embedded
> >copies should also be dropped in favor of the standa
Coin,
Quoting Lucas Nussbaum :
On 04/01/12 at 19:41 -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
The correct solution is to make ruby-builder drop it's embedded copy of
blankslate and depend on it instead. Ideally all the other embedded
copies should also be dropped in favor of the standalone package.
I a
On 01/04/2012 04:41 PM, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
The correct solution is to make ruby-builder drop it's embedded copy of
blankslate and depend on it instead. Ideally all the other embedded
copies should also be dropped in favor of the standalone package.
FYI: that dependency is 1.8 only.
- Sam
On 04/01/12 at 19:41 -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> Cédric Boutillier escreveu isso aí:
> > On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 10:57:58PM -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > > Cédric Boutillier escreveu isso aí:
> > > > Hi!
> > > >
> > > > I have pushed to the repository the packaging for ruby-blankslate. I
Cédric Boutillier escreveu isso aí:
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 10:57:58PM -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > Cédric Boutillier escreveu isso aí:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > I have pushed to the repository the packaging for ruby-blankslate. It is
> > > a build-dependency of a dependency of the newest vers
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 10:57:58PM -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> Cédric Boutillier escreveu isso aí:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I have pushed to the repository the packaging for ruby-blankslate. It is
> > a build-dependency of a dependency of the newest version of ruby-mocha.
> > This simple package is l
Cédric Boutillier escreveu isso aí:
> Hi!
>
> I have pushed to the repository the packaging for ruby-blankslate. It is
> a build-dependency of a dependency of the newest version of ruby-mocha.
> This simple package is lintian clean and builds fine in a clean chroot.
>
> Can someone have a look a
13 matches
Mail list logo
