On 04/01/12 at 19:41 -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Cédric Boutillier escreveu isso aí: > > On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 10:57:58PM -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > > Cédric Boutillier escreveu isso aí: > > > > Hi! > > > > > > > > I have pushed to the repository the packaging for ruby-blankslate. It is > > > > a build-dependency of a dependency of the newest version of ruby-mocha. > > > > This simple package is lintian clean and builds fine in a clean chroot. > > > > > > > > Can someone have a look and possibly upload the package? > > > > > I won't be able to review the package, but quite a lot of packages already > > > include a copy of blankslate.rb ... in special, ruby-builder will > > > conflict with > > > ruby-blankslate: > > > > Thanks Antonio. I forgot to check for conflicts :( > > I am now making ruby-blankslate conflict with ruby-builder, and I > > propose the alternative ruby-blankslate | ruby-builder for > > (build-)dependencies of ruby-instantiator and ruby-introspection. > > Thant won't work. activesupport (and therefore rails, activeldap, > activerecord ...) depends on builder; if you make blankslate conflict > with builder you can't have blankslate installed together with rails, > which kind of sucks ... > > The correct solution is to make ruby-builder drop it's embedded copy of > blankslate and depend on it instead. Ideally all the other embedded > copies should also be dropped in favor of the standalone package.
I think it's OK to upload with the duplicate file, and open an RC bug against ruby-builder. For the others, it's a smaller issue since the private copy doesn't conflict. Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120104215804.ga23...@xanadu.blop.info
