Re: RFS: sup-mail

2019-03-26 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 10:21 PM, Jongmin Kim wrote: Dear Ruby team, I have fixed some bugs affecting 'sup-mail' (#843574, #871010). All the changes have been pushed to Salsa: https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/sup-mail The package was tested on meta/build with autopkgtest and was succe

RFS: sup-mail

2019-03-26 Thread Jongmin Kim
Dear Ruby team, I have fixed some bugs affecting 'sup-mail' (#843574, #871010). All the changes have been pushed to Salsa: https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/sup-mail The package was tested on meta/build with autopkgtest and was successfully built. It was also lintian clean. Please review and

Re: RFS: sup-mail

2014-10-01 Thread Per Andersson
Hi! I finally uploaded sup-mail. (Although I left the bugs in the BTS open and did not try to verify if they are still there or not. Later project.) Thanks a lot for the work Caitlin! -- Per On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Per Andersson wrote: > Hi again! > > I have not had the time to veri

Re: RFS: sup-mail

2014-09-07 Thread Per Andersson
Hi again! I have not had the time to verify anything yet. When we have verified (and hopefully resolved a few bugs in the BTS) I think we are ready for upload. -- Per -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...

Re: RFS: sup-mail

2014-09-07 Thread Per Andersson
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 9:14 PM, Caitlin Matos wrote: > >> >>> The upgrade from the older version of sup to this new one can be complex, >>> as >>> some configuration files may require manual migration. I have added some >>> information in the NEWS.Debian file for users. I had envisioned using >>>

Re: RFS: sup-mail

2014-09-05 Thread Caitlin Matos
The upgrade from the older version of sup to this new one can be complex, as some configuration files may require manual migration. I have added some information in the NEWS.Debian file for users. I had envisioned using maintainer scripts to automate this migration, but this became extraordina

Re: RFS: sup-mail

2014-08-31 Thread Per Andersson
Hi! Regarding sup-mail I am also working with switching upstreams for ruby-ncurses (ncursesw-ruby is now maintained by the Sup developers) and ruby-rubymail to rmail-sup (also maintained by the Sup developers). -- Per -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a sub

Re: RFS: sup-mail

2014-08-28 Thread Per Andersson
Hi Caitlin and others! On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Caitlin Matos wrote: > I have uploaded a new version of sup-mail to git. > > This *was* a package with 2 RC bugs, ruby1.9 use, and a dead RubyForge > homepage. I have worked on it for several weeks. Unfortunately, last week it > was removed

RFS: sup-mail

2014-08-26 Thread Caitlin Matos
I have uploaded a new version of sup-mail to git. This *was* a package with 2 RC bugs, ruby1.9 use, and a dead RubyForge homepage. I have worked on it for several weeks. Unfortunately, last week it was removed from unstable because the FTP master thought it was dead.[1] His advice was to conta

RFS: sup-mail 0.12.1+git20120407.aaa852f-2

2012-08-03 Thread Per Andersson
Hi! Very small fix for sup-mail. When wrapped text is expanded a crash occurs due to sloppy handling of String and Array as the same thing. This worked under Ruby 1.8 but not under Ruby 1.9. The package builds fine with cowbuilder and is lintian clean. Changes since last upload. sup-mail (0.12

Re: RFS: sup-mail 0.12.1+git20120407.aaa852f-1

2012-06-20 Thread Per Andersson
Hi! Additional changes for sup-mail. * Depend on ruby-locale instead of libgettext-ruby1.9.1. - Add patch for requiring iconv and locale instead of gettext. It builds fine with cowbuilder and is lintian clean. Please review and upload. Thanks in advance! -- Per -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, e

RFS: sup-mail 0.12.1+git20120407.aaa852f-1

2012-06-08 Thread Per Andersson
Hi! Finally I hope sup-mail can be uploaded! I have not tried to build it in a clean chroot since ruby-rubymail is not yet uploaded. Changes since last upload: sup-mail (0.12.1+git20120407.aaa852f-1) unstable; urgency=low * New maintainer. (Closes: #660509) * New upstream version. - In

Re: RFS: sup-mail 0.12-1+git20120407.aaa852f-1

2012-05-28 Thread Cédric Boutillier
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 09:05:47AM -0700, Clint Byrum wrote: > Excerpts from Cédric Boutillier's message of 2012-05-27 23:32:41 -0700: > > > Thanks! You've addressed all my concerns. This version of sup-mail is > > working > > very well, and I am using it to answer right now. I believe it can go i

Re: RFS: sup-mail 0.12-1+git20120407.aaa852f-1

2012-05-28 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Cédric Boutillier's message of 2012-05-27 23:32:41 -0700: > Hi! > > Excerpts from Per Andersson's message of sam. mai 26 00:56:52 +0200 2012: > > > > I managed to fix this. See [0] for the trivial fix. Please review and > > try it out. > > > > [0] > > http://anonscm.debian.org/git

Re: RFS: sup-mail 0.12-1+git20120407.aaa852f-1

2012-05-27 Thread Cédric Boutillier
Hi! Excerpts from Per Andersson's message of sam. mai 26 00:56:52 +0200 2012: > > I managed to fix this. See [0] for the trivial fix. Please review and > try it out. > > [0] > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-ruby-extras/sup-mail.git;a=commit;h=39c5d26a8e918c498f178b98dd5fff1c47335c3b >

Re: RFS: sup-mail 0.12-1+git20120407.aaa852f-1

2012-05-25 Thread Per Andersson
Hi! On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Per Andersson wrote: > Hi! > > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Per Andersson wrote: >> Hi! >> >> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Cédric Boutillier >> wrote: >>> >>> - Trying to expand a signature in the thread view mode yields a crash >>>  with the follo

Re: RFS: sup-mail 0.12-1+git20120407.aaa852f-1

2012-05-25 Thread Per Andersson
Hi! On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Per Andersson wrote: > Hi! > > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Cédric Boutillier > wrote: >> >> I encountered two issues with sup-mail with respect to GPG support: >> - Although I could send signed emails, I could not send encrypted / >>  encrypted and sign

Re: RFS: sup-mail 0.12-1+git20120407.aaa852f-1

2012-05-24 Thread Per Andersson
Hi! On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > Hi! > > I've built successfully the package, and managed to use it to read my > emails. It works quite nicely. Neat! > I have no comments about the packaging > (except I don't think that the debian/sup-mail.install file is needed,

Re: RFS: sup-mail 0.12-1+git20120407.aaa852f-1

2012-05-23 Thread Cédric Boutillier
Hi! I've built successfully the package, and managed to use it to read my emails. It works quite nicely. I have no comments about the packaging (except I don't think that the debian/sup-mail.install file is needed, since the files in bin/ are automatically moved there by gem2deb). I encountered t

RFS: sup-mail 0.12-1+git20120407.aaa852f-1

2012-05-22 Thread Per Andersson
Hi there! I have ported sup-mail to gem2deb and fixed a lot of bugs in the process. It is now maintained under the pkg-ruby-extras umbrella and available in the git repo. The package is lintian clean and builds fine with pbuilder. Earlier there have been some discussions about ignoring failing te

Re: RFS: sup-mail 0.12.1+git20120407.aaa852f-1

2012-05-18 Thread Per Andersson
Hi! On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:15 PM, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > Hi! > > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:05:56PM +0200, Per Andersson wrote: > >> What are the issues? > > Maybe they are related with the ones I get when I try using sup-mail: > when browsing my INBOX containing signed messages, sup-mail

Re: RFS: sup-mail 0.12.1+git20120407.aaa852f-1

2012-05-16 Thread Cédric Boutillier
Hi! On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 10:05:56PM +0200, Per Andersson wrote: > What are the issues? Maybe they are related with the ones I get when I try using sup-mail: when browsing my INBOX containing signed messages, sup-mail quit with the following error. undefined method `empty' for GPGME::Data:Cl

Re: RFS: sup-mail 0.12.1+git20120407.aaa852f-1

2012-05-16 Thread Per Andersson
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:23 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: > Excerpts from Cédric Boutillier's message of Sun May 13 14:49:41 -0700 2012: >> >> It installs ok, but when I tried to launch it, it crashed immediately >> with the following error: >> >> --- NoMethodError from thread: main >> undefined method

Re: RFS: sup-mail 0.12.1+git20120407.aaa852f-1

2012-05-15 Thread Clint Byrum
Excerpts from Cédric Boutillier's message of Sun May 13 14:49:41 -0700 2012: > Hi Per, > > > The following packages are ready to be uploaded (I also verified the > > points listed on > > http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/RubyExtras/RequestingSponsorship). > > > Could you please sponsor them? > >

Re: RFS: sup-mail 0.12.1+git20120407.aaa852f-1

2012-05-14 Thread Per Andersson
Hi! On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:49 PM, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > Hi Per, > >> The following packages are ready to be uploaded (I also verified the >> points listed on >> http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/RubyExtras/RequestingSponsorship). > >> Could you please sponsor them? > >>  sup-mail 0.12.1+

Re: RFS: sup-mail 0.12.1+git20120407.aaa852f-1

2012-05-13 Thread Cédric Boutillier
Hi Per, > The following packages are ready to be uploaded (I also verified the > points listed on > http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/RubyExtras/RequestingSponsorship). > Could you please sponsor them? > sup-mail 0.12.1+git20120407.aaa852f-1 Thank you for taking care of sup-mail. I have succes

RFS: sup-mail 0.12.1+git20120407.aaa852f-1

2012-04-09 Thread Per Andersson
Hi, The following packages are ready to be uploaded (I also verified the points listed on http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/RubyExtras/RequestingSponsorship). Could you please sponsor them? sup-mail 0.12.1+git20120407.aaa852f-1 This version closes 9 out of the 13 outstanding bugs. Included is