Re: gem2deb: salsa-ci.yml vs. .gitattributes [was: Re: RFS: ruby-wisper and ruby-necromancer]

2020-02-15 Thread Gabriel Filion
Hello, pitching in a bit late, but just to confirm: I've also been using gem2deb version 1.0.4 from debian sid. thanks a bunch for catching the missing files and creating them! I didn't think to check for them when creating the packages since I still don't know very well all that should be there

Re: debian/salsa-ci.yml created by gem2deb [was: Re: RFS: ruby-wisper and ruby-necromancer]

2020-02-12 Thread Georg Faerber
Hi, On 20-02-12 15:40:23, Daniel Leidert wrote: >I think I found the culprit and also fixed it. The .gitattributes file >inside the template directory prevents itself and salsa-ci.yml from >being exported into the gem2deb source and therefor into the package, >where both are missin

AW:debian/salsa-ci.yml created by gem2deb [was: Re: RFS: ruby-wisper and ruby-necromancer]

2020-02-12 Thread Daniel Leidert
---Von: Utkarsh Gupta Datum: Mi., 12. Feb. 2020, 01:27An: debian-ruby Betreff: Re: debian/salsa-ci.yml created by gem2deb [was: Re: RFS: ruby-wisper and ruby-necromancer]On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 7:24 PM Georg Faerber wrote:> Works for me (using 0.45), if it doesn't for you, we should investigat

Re: debian/salsa-ci.yml created by gem2deb [was: Re: RFS: ruby-wisper and ruby-necromancer]

2020-02-11 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 7:24 PM Georg Faerber wrote: > Works for me (using 0.45), if it doesn't for you, we should investigate, > maybe there is a bug lurking, somewhere. I am using the latest version. 1.0.4. Maybe this should help us now \o/ Best, Utkarsh

Re: debian/salsa-ci.yml created by gem2deb [was: Re: RFS: ruby-wisper and ruby-necromancer]

2020-02-11 Thread Georg Faerber
On 20-02-11 19:12:45, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > When packaging a new gem, using gem2deb doesn't create a > debian/salsa-ci.yml file. > For instance, gem2deb dry-types. This will not yield a salsa-ci.yml > file, whilst it should. Works for me (using 0.45), if it doesn't for you, we should investigate,

Re: gem2deb: salsa-ci.yml vs. .gitattributes [was: Re: RFS: ruby-wisper and ruby-necromancer]

2020-02-11 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hi Georg, On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 7:10 PM Georg Faerber wrote: > > JFTR: It is also missing debian/.gitattributes - probably for the same > > reason. > > I just did a test: debian/salsa-ci.yml is created correctly, but > debian/.gitattributes is not. I guess the current code doesn't handle > file

Re: debian/salsa-ci.yml created by gem2deb [was: Re: RFS: ruby-wisper and ruby-necromancer]

2020-02-11 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hi Georg, On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 6:41 PM Georg Faerber wrote: > > Whilst there's debian/salsa-ci.yml in the template, it still doesn't > > seem to work. > > It didn't work for me either. And Antonio is aware of this. > > I'm not aware, mind to elaborate? What does not work, specifically? When p

gem2deb: salsa-ci.yml vs. .gitattributes [was: Re: RFS: ruby-wisper and ruby-necromancer]

2020-02-11 Thread Georg Faerber
Hi, On 20-02-12 00:50:58, Daniel Leidert wrote: > JFTR: It is also missing debian/.gitattributes - probably for the same > reason. I just did a test: debian/salsa-ci.yml is created correctly, but debian/.gitattributes is not. I guess the current code doesn't handle files with a dot in the beginni

Re: RFS: ruby-wisper and ruby-necromancer

2020-02-11 Thread Daniel Leidert
Am Mittwoch, den 12.02.2020, 05:04 +0530 schrieb Utkarsh Gupta: > Hiya, > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 4:51 AM Georg Faerber wrote: > > Another note: Both (and ruby-tty-spinner) lacked debian/salsa-ci.yml. > > That is fixed now. > > > > Did you create all of them with the help of gem2deb? > > Whil

debian/salsa-ci.yml created by gem2deb [was: Re: RFS: ruby-wisper and ruby-necromancer]

2020-02-11 Thread Georg Faerber
On 20-02-12 05:04:53, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > Whilst there's debian/salsa-ci.yml in the template, it still doesn't > seem to work. > It didn't work for me either. And Antonio is aware of this. I'm not aware, mind to elaborate? What does not work, specifically?

Re: RFS: ruby-wisper and ruby-necromancer

2020-02-11 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hiya, On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 4:51 AM Georg Faerber wrote: > Another note: Both (and ruby-tty-spinner) lacked debian/salsa-ci.yml. > That is fixed now. > > Did you create all of them with the help of gem2deb? Whilst there's debian/salsa-ci.yml in the template, it still doesn't seem to work. It d

Re: RFS: ruby-wisper and ruby-necromancer

2020-02-11 Thread Georg Faerber
Hi, Another note: Both (and ruby-tty-spinner) lacked debian/salsa-ci.yml. That is fixed now. Did you create all of them with the help of gem2deb? Cheers, Georg

Re: RFS: ruby-wisper and ruby-necromancer

2020-02-11 Thread Georg Faerber
Hi, On 20-02-10 22:01:35, Gabriel Filion wrote: > I've pushed a bit more in my packaging work (and comprehension, thanks > all for the help on the IRC channel!) and I now have two more packages > that are ready: ruby-wisper and ruby-necromancer. > > Can someone please review my work in the salsa

RFS: ruby-wisper and ruby-necromancer

2020-02-10 Thread Gabriel Filion
Hello, I've pushed a bit more in my packaging work (and comprehension, thanks all for the help on the IRC channel!) and I now have two more packages that are ready: ruby-wisper and ruby-necromancer. Can someone please review my work in the salsa repos of the same names? I've had to add a build-d