Hello, I've pushed a bit more in my packaging work (and comprehension, thanks all for the help on the IRC channel!) and I now have two more packages that are ready: ruby-wisper and ruby-necromancer.
Can someone please review my work in the salsa repos of the same names? I've had to add a build-dep to ruby-wisper since the spec_helper.rb file unconditionally "require"s the coveralls library but it's not marked as a development requirement in the gemspec. I've reported this upstream: https://github.com/krisleech/wisper/issues/182 Also, the necromancer library doesn't ship its .rspec file in the published gem as a choice they made to avoid clutter in the releases. For now I've added a patch in debian/patches/ that re-adds the file back in so that tests pass. However, upstream recommended that I build with code from github. I'm not sure if I should keep that patch in the debian package, or if I should change how upstream releases are downloaded, instead, so that I get the .rspec file with the rest of the upstream files. Thanks!
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
