Hi,
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 06:25:07AM +, Potter, Tim (Cloud Services) wrote:
> Hi everyone. I've fixed a RC bug in the camping Ruby module. Could
> someone please take a look and upload?
>
> I took the liberty of fixing the bug, writing a change log entry and
> pushing to git since it was
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 09:20:12PM +0200, Per Andersson wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 12:12 AM, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> > The freeze is approaching and a lot of our packages could benefit from
> > an update to a newer upstream version.
> >
> > As discussed during the IRC meeting, I propose t
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 11:50:01PM +0200, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
> Actually the packages listed on the tracker are no longer the blockers;
> the blockers are:
> coquelicot, ruby-gnome2, ruby-patron, sup-mail, xapian-bindings
A non-blocking ruby-gnome2 is in NEW. (Well, that sounds contradic
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 02:24:09AM +0200, Christian Hofstaedtler wrote:
> - ruby-gnome2
I will deal with that one. I need to add some missing binary-all
packages anyway. I hope to do it this Friday!
Cheers,
Paul
--
Using the Power of Debian GNU/Linux | E-mail: pau...@debian.org
Jabber/GTalk
Hey,
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 03:35:00PM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> I've updated ruby-domain-name to a new upstream version and to build with
> gem2deb >=0.3.0. The package is lintian clean and builds fine in a clean
> environment.
>
> I took the liberty to set the license of debian/* to BS
Hey,
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 01:21:33PM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> I've updated ruby-file-tail to a new upstream version and to build with
> gem2deb >=0.3.0. The package is lintian clean and builds fine in a clean
> environment.
>
> Here is the last entry of the changelog:
> [...]
>
> Ple
Hello,
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 01:10:12PM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> I pushed to the repo a new version of ruby-bio. The package builds fine
> in a clean environment. It has still a few lintian warnings:
>
> W: ruby-bio: image-file-in-usr-lib
> usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/bio/shell/rails/ven
Hey,
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 11:20:54AM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> I've updated ruby-ogginfo to a new upstream version and to build wil
> gem2deb >=0.3.0.
>
> Here is the last entry of the changelog:
> [...]
>
> Please review and upload. Thanks!
Done!
Cheers,
Paul
--
Using the Power o
Hey,
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 09:59:11AM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> I updated ruby-rubytorrent repository so that it builds with the newer
> gem2deb.
> I did not match correctly the versions in the Breaks/Replaces
> dependency relations on the old version. As a consequence, the old
> libtor
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 07:42:27PM +0200, Paul van Tilburg wrote:
> Especially for the Debian/Ruby Extras team:
> - If you are one of the main uploaders of a package, we ask you to do
> the upload as soon as possible. If we notice that there is not so
> much activity from the
Hello all,
A few emails ago, Antonio Terceiro announced that he was working on a
way to integrate libraries installed via apt/Debian into the Rubygems
system. The actual integration will be provided by the
rubygems-integration package, but it requires the installation of the
gemspec files. For m
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 01:16:32AM +0200, Patrick Ringl wrote:
> thanks for the review - thing's are fixed! :-) .. so you may proceed :>
Yes, thanks, they have both been uploaded.
Cheers,
Paul
--
Using the Power of Debian GNU/Linux | E-mail: pau...@debian.org
Jabber/GTalk: p...@luon.net
Hey,
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 02:52:40PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> I've uploaded gem2deb 0.3.0 with support for installing gemspecs earlier
> today, and now we have a deadline: June 30th!
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2012/06/msg6.html
>
> I can probably handle the
Heya,
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 07:14:47PM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> In an attempt to have more recent versions of Ruby libs in Wheezy, I
> updated ruby-gherkhin repository to a newer version.
Yes, indeed. The run to get things transitioned has left many libs a
bit neglected upstreamwise.
Heya,
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 08:56:55PM +0200, Per Andersson wrote:
> The package librmail-ruby has been orphaned, I adopted it.
> I have managed to port librmail-ruby to ruby-rubymail.
>
> Following packages are built
>
> ruby-rubymail-doc
> ruby-rubymail
> librmail-ruby-doc
> librmail
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 10:23:58PM +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
> On 22:32 Tue 19 Jun , Paul van Tilburg wrote:
> > Ok, just a few comments (and one upload):
> >
> > > ruby-hmac (0.4.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
> > > [...]
> >
> > There still se
Heya,
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 04:29:32PM +0200, Patrick Ringl wrote:
> the packages are lintian clean and build fine in a pbuilder sid
> environment.
>
>
> @Paul: could you sponsor/review it? Seems as if mika is busy and I'd
> really love to get it due in time.
No problem. I think that ruby
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 03:40:46PM +0200, Per Andersson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Paul van Tilburg wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 01:44:27AM +0200, Per Andersson wrote:
> >> I have updated ruby-eventmachine. It builds fine with pbuilder
> >> a
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 03:58:23PM +0200, Per Andersson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Paul van Tilburg wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 12:29:02AM +0200, Per Andersson wrote:
> > Package seems fine, but there are a few (pedantic mode) lintian things
> > (which
Hey,
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:58:08AM +0200, Per Andersson wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 5:38 AM, Vasudev Kamath
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 2:02 AM, Paul van Tilburg wrote:
> >>> ruby-bcrypt (3.0.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
> >>> [...]
>
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 02:34:35PM +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I've prepared new debian version of *ruby-polyglot* *ruby-bcrypt* and
> *ruby-hmac* and pushed the changes to our repository. Below are the
> change logs of each packages
Ok, just a few comments (and one upload):
>
Heya,
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 07:58:25PM +0900, Youhei SASAKI wrote:
> I've add RTtool, simple table formatter like RD, to team repository.
> This package is transition of the new Ruby policy, and lintian,
> cowbuilder, piuparts clean.
>
> Could you please sponsor them?
Sure, just uploaded, than
Hey,
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 04:16:20PM +0900, Youhei SASAKI wrote:
> The following packages are ready to be uploaded.
> Could you please sponsor them?
>
> * ruby-rack-protection: Protects against typical web attacks for Rack apps
>* ITP: #665085
>
> # New upstream of ruby-sinatra depends r
Hey,
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:58:22AM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> I've updated ruby-gnuplot repository to a newer version. It is lintian
> clean and builds fine with cowbuilder.
> [...]
> Could you please review and possibly upload this version? Thank you very
> much in advance.
Uploaded,
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 01:44:27AM +0200, Per Andersson wrote:
> I have updated ruby-eventmachine. It builds fine with pbuilder
> and is lintian clean (if the author of the changelog entry is
> changed to an uploader).
Yes, but you are the uploader. Why didn't you add yourself? Please
do so.
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 12:06:53AM -0700, shawn wrote:
> resend: apparently this web site is blacklisted (??)
I actually did also receive the previous mail attempt. So maybe not. :)
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ruby-kyotocabinet"
>
> * Package name: ruby-kyotocabinet
>
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 09:59:10PM +0200, Paul van Tilburg wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 12:29:02AM +0200, Per Andersson wrote:
> > I have updated ruby-lockfile. It builds fine with pbuilder and
> > is lintian clean.
> >
> > Changes since last upload
Hey,
On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 12:29:02AM +0200, Per Andersson wrote:
> I have updated ruby-lockfile. It builds fine with pbuilder and
> is lintian clean.
>
> Changes since last upload:
>
> ruby-lockfile (2.1.0-2) unstable; urgency=low
>
> * Correct binary ruby versions tag.
> * Relax conflic
Hey,
On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 12:26:01AM +0200, Per Andersson wrote:
> I have updated ruby-chronic to ease transition. It builds with pbuilder
> and is lintian clean.
>
> [...]
>
> Please review and upload. Thanks in advance!
Uploaded!
Paul
--
Using the Power of Debian GNU/Linux | E-mail: pa
Hey,
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 12:17:52PM +0530, Praveen A wrote:
> I have packaged http_connection ruby gem and it is available in our
> git repo
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-ruby-extras/ruby-http-connection.git;a=summary
> . It is lintian clean and builds fine in a chroot. It does no
Hey,
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 07:21:58PM +0200, Per Andersson wrote:
> I have fixed #675951 (FTBFS) and added a patch to ruby-ncurses for it.
>
> It builds fine in pbuilder and is lintian clean.
>
> [...]
>
> Please review and upload.
Uploaded!
Paul
--
Using the Power of Debian GNU/Linux |
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:45:24PM +0200, Per Andersson wrote:
> Changes pushed.
>
> I ran pbuilder and piuparts which both succeed.
Looks good; uploaded!
Cheers,
Paul
--
Using the Power of Debian GNU/Linux | E-mail: pau...@debian.org
Jabber/GTalk: p...@luon.net | GnuPG key ID: 0x500
Hey,
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 12:59:26AM +0200, Per Andersson wrote:
> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Cédric Boutillier
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Per Andersson wrote:
> >> Do I have the teams green light for fixing the ruby-ncurses package?
> >> (Switching upstream, add 1.9 c
Hey,
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 01:53:26AM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> I've pushed to the repository a proposition for the packaging of
> ruby-innate. It builds fine with cowbuilder and is lintian clean.
>
> Could you please review and possibly upload this package?
Uploaded!
Cheers,
Paul
--
Hey,
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 07:05:40PM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> I've pushed to the repository a proposition for the packaging of
> ruby-rubytorrent. It builds fine with cowbuilder and is lintian clean.
> It contains patches to port it to Ruby1.9, so it should work for ruby1.8
> and ruby1
Hey,
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 03:28:58PM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> I've updated ruby-highline repository to a newer version. It is lintian
> clean and builds fine with cowbuilder.
Uploaded!
Cheers,
Paul
--
Using the Power of Debian GNU/Linux | E-mail: pau...@debian.org
Jabber/GTalk: p.
Hey,
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:21:30PM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> I've updated ruby-json repository to a newer version. It is closing
> the FTBFS #673661 critical bug, as the tests now all pass. It is lintian
> clean (except hardening warnings) and builds fine with cowbuilder.
> Here is th
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:41:11AM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> [...] I made it recommend ruby-rb-inotify for linux architectures,
> which seemed sensible to me, but maybe some one with more expertise on
> this could advise something else.
Seems sensible to me.
> Could you please review an
Hi,
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 12:05:15PM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> I prepared the transition ruby-rb-inotify. The packages builds fine with
> cowbuilder and is lintian clean.
>
> Could you please review and possibly upload this version?
Done!
Cheers,
Paul
P.S. I am not trying to bypass a
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 12:36:39PM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> I prepared the transition ruby-usb. The packages builds fine with
> cowbuilder and is lintian clean.
>
> Could you please review and possibly upload this version?
Yes, looking good, no comments. Uploaded!
Paul
--
Using the P
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 06:47:30PM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> I updated the repository of yard, to contain a new upstream version.
> The tests are now working with this new upstream version, so the results
> are not ignored anymore. I also made a few changes, such as using
> libjs-jquery ins
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 11:31:46PM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> Could you please review and upload this version?
Done!
Paul
--
Using the Power of Debian GNU/Linux | E-mail: pau...@debian.org
Jabber/GTalk: p...@luon.net | GnuPG key ID: 0x50064181
signature.asc
Description: Digit
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 06:56:36PM +0200, Sebastian Boehm wrote:
> The following package is ready to be uploaded (I also verified the
> points listed on
> http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Requesting_Sponsorship).
>
> Could you please sponsor it?
>
> ruby-build 20120423-1
Done!
Paul
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 12:47:42AM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> Could you please review and possibly upload this package?
Done!
Paul
--
Using the Power of Debian GNU/Linux | E-mail: pau...@debian.org
Jabber/GTalk: p...@luon.net | GnuPG key ID: 0x50064181
signature.asc
Descripti
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 12:22:17AM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> Could you please review and possibly upload this package?
This has been taken care of!
Paul
--
Using the Power of Debian GNU/Linux | E-mail: pau...@debian.org
Jabber/GTalk: p...@luon.net | GnuPG key ID: 0x50064181
Hey all,
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:50:21AM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> I wrote a first draft available on gobby.debian.org, under
> Teams/RubyExtras/transition_to_new_policy.txt. Before more polishing,
> could you please read/review/criticise/edit/improve (constructively :D)?
I have made s
ed to fix it but got stuck, the same holds for me.
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 06:51:12PM +0530, Praveen A wrote:
> > 2012/1/11 Paul van Tilburg :
> > I tried a bit, but I don't think I will be able to finish it :(
> >
> > I have asked help from upstream
> >
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:21:48AM +0530, Praveen A wrote:
> 2012/1/12 Tom Inglis :
> > I was wondering whether there was anything I could do to help
> > transition Ruby from 1.8.7 to 1.9.3 in Debian.
>
> Before we switch to 1.9.3 be default we have to port all popular
> packages to ruby 1.9 (it w
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 01:26:29AM -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> # Usage
>
> $ ruby-debian-doc
>
> That's it.
An nice option would also be to have it automatically updated/installed
when a Ruby package is installed. This could be some hook somewhere
to do this when enabled.
Hey,
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 08:23:46PM +0530, Praveen A wrote:
> It builds fine with pbuilder, runs all tests successfully, it is
> lintian clean, it unapply patches after build and is available in our
> git repo.
>
> Please review and upload.
Reviewed, it looks fine... uploaded it.
> PS: mixl
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:19:48AM +0100, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> I finished packaging ruby-mkrf. This closes an 500+ day-old ITP/RFP bug,
> and is required (it seems, at least would be nice to have) for the
> transition of ruby-opengl to gem2deb packaging.
Ah, good, yes... opengl is next.
> T
Hello all,
I have prepared a new package for Haml that complies with the new policy
and is as good as ready to follow the transition. However, I would
like to ask people that use Haml to review and/or test my package before
I upload it to unstable in, say, two weeks.
Firstly, Haml used to contai
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 12:33:22PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 09/11/11 at 08:49 -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí:
> > > On 08/11/11 at 23:14 +0100, Paul van Tilburg wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 09:47:57PM +
Hey all,
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 07:42:57PM +0200, Olivier Sallou wrote:
> Tags: patch
>
> Here is patch to remove compression of examples in ruby-gtk2
>
> Only impact is in debian/rules.
>
>
> Olivier
> diff -Nru ruby-gnome2-1.0.0/debian/rules ruby-gnome2-1.0.0/debian/rules
> --- ruby-gn
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 10:23:30PM +0200, Cédric Boutillier wrote:
> Could someone have a look at the package and possibly upload it?
Will check and upload!
Paul
--
PhD Student @ Eindhoven | email: pau...@debian.org
University of Technology, The Netherlands | JID: p...@luo
Hey all,
I just wanted to throw a random idea in here. I've been thinking that
since we now ship most libs for Ruby 1.8 and 1.9.1 by default, the
presence of tests have become quite vital.
An example of this is for example ruby-rchardet, which even cannot
be parsed by Ruby 1.9.1.
As you all know
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 09:41:53PM +0200, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 9:34 PM,
> wrote:
> > Your mail to 'Pkg-ruby-extras-commits' with the subject
> >
> > [SCM] packaging for ctioga2 annotated tag, upstream/0.2, created.
> > upstream/0.2
> >
> > Is being held until t
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 04:23:04PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 29/01/11 at 08:03 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > 0) (native) "libs are named ruby1.8-foo, ruby1.9.1-foo, etc. and provide
> > ruby-foo"
> > --
>
Hello all,
Sorry for the late reply, it required some thinking and sorting out.
As most of you know or have noticed, I am not as active in the team
anymore as I used to be. This has partially been a matter of
motivation, packages you care about lose upstream, the whole Gem thing
and attitudes I
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 09:49:13AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Thanks to the work of Mike Dalessio, the pkg-ruby-extras was moved to
> the Debian wiki:
> http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/RubyExtras
*scraps an item from his today list*
Thanks Mike! :)
Paul
--
PhD Student @ Eindhoven
split-up rails package. Are there any updates about this upcoming
upload?
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:05:57PM +0100, Paul van Tilburg wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 07:30:39PM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 01:55:05AM -0600, Adam Majer wrote:
> > > [
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 03:01:28PM +0900, Tatsuki Sugiura wrote:
> I'm Sorry. It's my fault!
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=572036#36
>
> > Upstream distributes both (1.x and 2.x). I think it's convenient
> > so on debian. I should revert version of libnetnet-ssh-ruby and
> > l
Hello everyone,
Can somebody explain me, what the duplicates are in the
libnet-{scp,sftp,sftp2,ssh,ssh2}-ruby pacakges. Which one do we really
want _in the Squeeze_ release and what depedencies. Can we coordinate a
bit here, please. Thank you :)
Resolving this might also kill some RC bugs!
Ki
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 07:51:14AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 29/03/10 at 19:59 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > I am working on updates to libmemcache-client-ruby and libi18n-ruby
> > (which I did not previously notice were available, on account of both
> > upstreams switching to releas
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 07:30:39PM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 01:55:05AM -0600, Adam Majer wrote:
> > Split up of rails is overdue, and that is mostly my fault. By the time
> > I've decided splitting up rails was a good idea, Roberto C. Sanchez
> > has already upload
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 01:26:31PM +0200, Will Daniels wrote:
> On 02/26/2010 12:43 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > To join the team, follow the instructions on
> > http://pkg-ruby-extras.alioth.debian.org/
>
> Damn, I had just unsubscribed from that list (looked kinda
> dead)...will do that then, t
Hello,
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:00:34AM +0200, Will Daniels wrote:
> I have another packaging question, which is not exclusively ruby
> related, but I don't see a "general" packaging mailing list, except
> maybe policy, but I think this is more a judgement call than a matter of
> policy.
The (g
Hello Will,
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 02:04:33AM +0200, Will Daniels wrote:
> I'm currently packaging a ruby gem called rdiscount that provides a
> simple bin script 'rdiscount' that begins by doing:
>
> $: << File.expand_path(File.dirname(__FILE__) + "/../lib")
> require 'rdiscount'
Ah yes. I se
Hello everyone,
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 11:07:30AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Our Ruby packages are in quite a bad shape for squeeze, and need your
> help!
Yes, if you just can work on one package, it can help.
> What still needs to be done:
> - transition all library packages that provide p
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 10:27:56PM +0900, Tatsuki Sugiura wrote:
> First version of liblocale-ruby I said was released at 2009-11-14
> as "2.0.5", because it was splitted from ruby-gettext.
>
> # Project of locale started at 2006-07-27 on rubyforge. Perhapse,
> # the project released old version t
Hi!
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 08:48:17PM +0900, Tatsuki Sugiura wrote:
> * Package name: liblocale-ruby
> Version : 2.0.5
> Upstream Author : Masao Mutoh
> * URL : http://rubyforge.org/projects/locale/
liblocale-ruby has been in Debian for a quite while, but it was rem
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 05:16:15PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> OK, let's do the following:
> - pkg-ruby-maintainers@:
> + Maintainer/Uploaders: field
> + machine-generated emails (dak, etc) about packages
> + short discussions about package-specific issues, especially when they
> origi
Hello all,
First of all I want to say that Lucas and I decided that Ruby 1.9.1 can
be uploaded independently from what we are currently doing/talking about.
However, we should not bother fixing all the libs until we have clearly
decided on a policy.
Still, if you want to try out stuff, upload to
Hello Esteban,
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 11:30:13PM +0100, Esteban Manchado Velázquez wrote:
> Paul, did you talk to upstream to try to sort the issues out? I see that
> at least the data/ directory issue is still there in the next, 1.1.2 version.
I did not, but I am using an improved work-arou
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 11:40:57AM +0200, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> On 4/23/07, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, it would rather be in the ruby source package, as I plan
> to use 'short names', such as irb, rdoc and not their 1.8-ending
> counterparts. I think that it really s
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 10:03:15AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 13/04/07 at 22:45 +0200, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> > Nearly half of the interpreter section is actually ruby packages. What
> > about asking for a
> >
> > Section: ruby
> >
> > just like for Perl and Python ?
>
> That would b
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 12:23:31PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I don't see how: no packages depend on ri, rdoc and irb to provide a full
> ruby install. Or at least, nothing that aptitude shows me. So, unless I am
> very
> mistaken, this problem is still on. Moreover, people I wrote to thi
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 01:28:13AM +0100, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> For those of you who don't follow ruby-talk, here is the summary of a
> discussion of tonight. Quite a few ruby-talk posters are complaining
> about the debian version of Ruby: they find it painful not to have a
> complete ruby i
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 10:55:05PM +0100, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > This orphaned package has 1655 popcon installs, probably because it's
> > used by apt-listbugs.
> >
> > Anyone on the Ruby team, or Junichi, interested in adopting it?
> > The orphaning bug is at #
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 11:27:17PM +0200, Martin Saturka wrote:
> I would like to ask you, what packages at Debian are available as
> ruby-mmap alternatives (I have not found it in Debian). I ask for it
> because of my Ruby/fastcgi development needs. The mmap library is used
> e.g. at a script on h
Hello everybody,
In light of the recent move of Debian IRC channels[1] I'm moving the
# debian-ruby channel to OFTC[2]. Despite controversy surrounding this
IRC move I presume that people will look for us there since the
irc.debian.org pointer has been changed. I would like to welcome the
curren
Hello,
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 03:24:29PM +0200, Stefan Huehner wrote:
> at the moment there are 3 distinct ruby versions in the archive.
>
> - ruby1.6
> - ruby1.8
> - ruby1.9 (experimental)
>
> Is ruby1.6 needed in the archive? Or should be remaining users of
> ruby1.6 be migrated to ruby1.8.
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 02:04:38PM -0400, Bakki Kudva wrote:
> I built 1.8.4 and got a LOT of warnings and couple of errors.
> At the end of build ..
>
> internal error: collect info objdump-info about package libruby1.8-dbg: 256
> N: Skipping check of binary package libruby1.8-dbg
Hmm, odd,
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 09:38:51AM -0400, Bakki Kudva wrote:
> Thank you Paul and Mathew. I like this approach and will try it. I
> expect that the Sarge version 2.8.14 of devscripts should work ?
Yes, no problem. They are just simple (wrapper) scripts to make stuff
easier.
Paul
--
Student @ E
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 04:12:46PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 02:16:05PM -0400, Bakki Kudva wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I would like to upgrade to 1.8.4 on Sarge. It seems like I can either...
> >
> > 1. Build from sources under the watchful eyes of checkinstall
> > 2. U
Hello Bob,
Sorry for the not-so-quick reply!
I am not very familiar with this stuff, but I'll give it a shot.
(This is why I initially didn't answer.)
On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 12:24:08PM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
> I am working with some .rhtml examples and would like to install eruby
> to handle t
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 07:28:25PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I'd like to raise again the subject of the naming of library packages.
> I've read the python policy, which does sensible things, and wrote
>
> http://pkg-ruby-extras.alioth.debian.org/policy.html
>
> Could you please comment on
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 10:44:51AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I think we should work on a documentation for upstream developers, named
> "How to be nice to Linux distributions (re)packagers", and explaining
> some common mistakes and ways to make the DD happier, like :
> - don't distribute only
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 09:45:48PM +1100, Mike Williams wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: normal
>
> I request an adopter for the librmagick-ruby package.
>
> The package description is:
> RMagick is an interface between the Ruby programming language and the
> ImageMagick image processing libr
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 09:36:45AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 27/11/05 at 23:05 +, Esteban Manchado Velázquez wrote:
> > One more question: if we follow the Ubuntu proposal and make all Ruby
> > packages testable with it, it will probably be very easy to test all of them
> > at once.
On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 11:05:29PM +, Esteban Manchado Velázquez wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 12:36:33PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > Just one comment: wouldn't it be better having all the dev files
> > > > documentation in a version independent package, like libx-
Hey,
On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 11:31:39PM +, Esteban Manchado Velázquez wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 05:43:21PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > [...]
> > After thinking about it for a while, I came to the conclusion that we
> > have to consider the user's point of view. There are two kinds
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 11:27:26AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> The members of the pkg-ruby-extras team have agreed on a common position
> on RubyGems[0].
>
> [0] http://pkg-ruby-extras.alioth.debian.org/rubygems.html
>
> Feel free to read it and comment it here.
To give some more context on t
On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 04:34:39PM -0400, Douglas F. Calvert wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am awfully new to ruby so I think I might not be able to phrase the
> question accurately but I am going to give it a shot. I recently
> installed all of the ruby/rails packages with apt. When I went to test
> out t
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 11:18:06PM -0400, David Nusinow wrote:
> Hi all,
>Maybe we need to contact the gems developers on their own list and try
> and work out a way to fix the main issues we see. We can't force them to do
> any work, but if we present something concrete, we might be able to ha
warned when gems
are installed overriding a lib that already has been installed via
dpkg and vice versa.
This probably sound much more easy than it is, and it's also
more of a workaround.
Debian is about to unite much of Ruby lib/app packaging under a team.
We are improving our sys
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 11:00:48PM +0100, Esteban Manchado Velázquez wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 05:33:57PM +0200, Paul van Tilburg wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > There has been a discussion here about where I for example could stuff
> > my CDBS class. With Esteban a
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 05:33:57PM +0200, Paul van Tilburg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> There has been a discussion here about where I for example could stuff
> my CDBS class. With Esteban also working on one, we have talked and
> decided to merge them and join our efforts. I have a
Hi all,
There has been a discussion here about where I for example could stuff
my CDBS class. With Esteban also working on one, we have talked and
decided to merge them and join our efforts. I have also talked with
Jeff Bailey (CDBS maintainer) and he's not to happy about joining it
(yet) but is
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 01:02:38AM +0100, Esteban Manchado Velázquez wrote:
>Is anyone interested in a CDBS file for Ruby? I mean, something like
> ruby-setup-rb.mk, similar to python-distutils.mk and perlmodule.mk.
>
>I'm working on one, as I have seen no work on that. I'm still
> ex
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
