Re: MRI 1.9.3p362

2013-01-18 Thread James Healy
2013/1/3 Jordon Bedwell : > I would hold off on pushing out 362 into experimental for now: > https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/7629 > > I know it's experimental but still, I hope it's not this experimental! I've updated my github clone of the team repo to 1.9.3p374 (on the experimental branch). J

Re: MRI 1.9.3p362

2013-01-07 Thread James Healy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 07/01/13 17:09, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Can you check the others? I did a quick check on two of the > rb_path_* and it seems to be ok. There are a few matches in the source package adanaxisgpl, but it looks like a naming conflict as the package

Re: MRI 1.9.3p362

2013-01-05 Thread James Healy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi Antonio, On 03/01/13 19:38, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Also, I am suspicious of those symbols changes. Those dropped > symbols might break compiled extensions who use them. Can you > investigate whether we are agoing to have problems with that? I

MRI 1.9.3p362

2012-12-28 Thread James Healy
Hi folks, I've updated my github copy[1] of the team's MRI repo to the latest release, 1.9.3p362. I'd love to see the latest MRI available in experimental during the wheezy freeze. Is it possible to have my work reviewed? Hopefully it's a good base to work from. cheers James [1] https://github

Re: Rubinius 2.0.0~rc1

2012-11-29 Thread James Healy
On 16 November 2012 18:47, James Healy wrote: > * there are 7 vendored C libraries in vendor/. 5 of them look like > they're used during compilation. Some are available in debian, but it > looks like their might be some non-standard modifications to at least > some of them. What&

Re: Update git repository with 1.9.3.194-4

2012-11-26 Thread James Healy
On 27 November 2012 00:02, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Note that -4 is not in testing yet due to a problem on sparc, so -5 will > hit the archive pretty soon. regarding the sparc failures, has anyone else noticed this pattern to the sparc build logs for the ruby1.9.1 source package? stadler - 32 c

Rubinius 2.0.0~rc1

2012-11-16 Thread James Healy
Hi, I had planned to have a go at packaging MRI 2.0~preview1, however after watching some rubyconf videos I got interested in rubinius again so I looked into updating the existing packaging work to the 2.0.0~rc1 release. The latest work is in my github account at [1]. It's more or less at the sam

MRI 1.9.3p327

2012-11-15 Thread James Healy
Hi folks, I've updated my github version [1] of the teams MRI git repo to the latest stable release of 1.9.3. I'm still quite new to packaging C libraries, so there's a commit [2] that seems a little strange to me. I had to update the debian/libruby1.9.1.symbols file because some symbols had been

Re: MRI 2.0 preview release

2012-11-04 Thread James Healy
On 04/11/2012 11:51 AM, "Lucas Nussbaum" wrote: > It depends on the 'ruby compatibility version' for that release. Is it > 1.9.1 or something else? How do I tell? James

MRI 2.0 preview release

2012-11-03 Thread James Healy
Hi folks, I'm interested to trying out the MRI 2.0 preview release so I thought I'd try and package it for experimental at the same time. Should it be an upgrade to the 1.9.1 packages or a new package that can be installed in parallel? My guess is a new package due to syntax changes in the langua

MRI 1.9.3p286

2012-10-14 Thread James Healy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi folks, I've updated my github version [1] of the teams MRI git repo to the latest stable release of 1.9.3. While the wheezy freeze is in place is it possible to upload the new version to experimental? It would be helpful to have it available for

Keysigning

2012-09-24 Thread James Healy
Hi folks, I'm an Australian ruby dev that dabbles in Debian packaging [1]. I'm holidaying in Europe until the end of January 2013 and would like to get a few cross signatures on my GPG key to assist with any future Debain work. Australia is far enough from everywhere that it makes sense to take ad

Re: Packaging MRI 1.9.3p194

2012-05-27 Thread James Healy
On 28 May 2012 09:54, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Your changes are pretty good, thanks. I've merged then and will upload > this version soon. Great, thanks for reviewing my work. James -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con

Re: Packaging MRI 1.9.3p194

2012-05-16 Thread James Healy
On 16 May 2012 01:01, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > After re-cloning your repo, I can build the package (well at least it > did not fail during dpkg-source. I did not look further). > Strange. Thanks - I think I had the upstream/1.9.4.194 tag pointing to the wrong ref. The current repo on my github ac

Re: Packaging MRI 1.9.3p194

2012-05-15 Thread James Healy
On 15 May 2012 20:46, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: >> You can see the results of my work at https://github.com/yob/debian-ruby > > But when I gbp-clone'd your repo, I did not get a pristine-tar branch. > Did you forget to push it? I forgot to create it. I re-imported 1.9.3p194 and forced pushed my work

Packaging MRI 1.9.3p194

2012-05-14 Thread James Healy
Hi folks, I'm keen to see MRI 1.9.3p194 make it into unstable before the wheezy freeze and thought I'd help out by trying to update the current packaging in git. I made some progress, but unfortunately I can't get it to build with git-buildpackage. Are there any guides to the way MRI is maintaine

Re: gems in $HOME

2012-02-17 Thread James Healy
> I'm new to ruby and rubygems. I installed the debian rubygems package > (from debian testing) and I'm trying to configure it to have gems in my > $HOME dir as this is a shared server. You should be able to install gems to your home dir by adding the following to ~/.gemrc gem: --user-install