-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi Antonio,
On 03/01/13 19:38, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Also, I am suspicious of those symbols changes. Those dropped > symbols might break compiled extensions who use them. Can you > investigate whether we are agoing to have problems with that? I'm suspicious of them too, however I'm still quite new to packaging C source so I'm unsure what to do next. How would I investigate possible issues? Is there much we can do about it if upstream is making these changes within point releases? James -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJQ6FAWAAoJEDWajVLwOtflY+cP/imXGtts2YQa/I1OVfvjyFZk UNHYWkQgaIqW2Fmt62qSfHs756PLDDd7KAsE1Mo8023cuDshV3RUsCXC06Zu84S9 8qZ0q1h44dVIeyRdjt4bTBwJQ1UZ5vlrFc52LVhXfXfPJtbr8GkRZHp0fJiO6axK i4hVc4tzoXOMuFL8pYkwDKOH0t7VQEpb7FrzipivUGLhtsWMtmhpllEc2x00a1tj sEDGqNPFPNIKLPt+Z27L6o31gKIeSjkWgWpCJpjZIi/GiuWaY2gqvWdHazS902Kd 5dNjNxOnWZFBUm4Pge3UKLwUzcfRYAp/9VhpMcfoeRZ8UV1l5SeZrJwnnSZknlTH 7vt79/9KMLLmrZvYi5rJMIx88ERL9ljmh79oDl6tplQoMEmKk+HeTlbrrY9jTaCT Uzg6ZxNA+R/j1L1vKSZoGXbXvI8+l3qjKVwqsblALVyQnnBnU1hvHIVd61jJBu7W roXfgV/punXbdSDuiGp1gQ+h2NXZ60Dm0/BU7JVkiHlBrfew3/fGgr7i35nBqmHc kk+MCzTsmte7NtpMwJldloA8Nd5pCvmXoFWnZFHbmRPX+hP3rY/qLQuO8vVd3Q2c lL5PBOhBuhJsmIQO/9u/CT+N4ORH+0hgLt0MOFJ8MEyzwqz+cVHGsQYJlI3eZzRK /hwUkBKS9o51AZFjVLdK =TTnt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50e8501d.1020...@yob.id.au
