Re: RFS: ruby-gitlab-sidekiq-fetcher 0.5.2-1

2019-09-22 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hey, On 22/09/19 11:51 pm, Priyanka Saggu wrote: > Hi, > > The following package is ready to be uploaded (I also verified the > points listed on > http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Requesting_Sponsorship). > > Could you please sponsor it? > > ruby-gitlab-sidekiq-fetcher 0.5.2-1 > [https:

RFS: ruby-gitlab-sidekiq-fetcher 0.5.2-1

2019-09-22 Thread Priyanka Saggu
Hi, The following package is ready to be uploaded (I also verified the points listed on http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Requesting_Sponsorship). Could you please sponsor it? ruby-gitlab-sidekiq-fetcher 0.5.2-1 [https://salsa.debian.org/priyankasaggu119-guest/ruby-gitlab-sidekiq-fetch

Re: RFS: ruby-benchmark-ips 2.7.2-1

2019-09-22 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hey, On 22/09/19 9:00 pm, Priyanka Saggu wrote: > Hi, > > The following package is ready to be uploaded (I also verified the > points listed on > http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Requesting_Sponsorship). > > Could you please sponsor it? > > ruby-benchmark-ips 2.7.2-1 > [https://salsa.de

Re: RFS: ruby-heapy 0.1.4-1

2019-09-22 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Not sure if you're subscribed to the list yet? If not, please do :) Find the review below. On 22/09/19 11:40 pm, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > Hey, > > On 22/09/19 9:09 pm, Priyanka Saggu wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The following package is ready to be uploaded (I also verified the >> points listed on >> http://

Re: RFS: ruby-heapy 0.1.4-1

2019-09-22 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hey, On 22/09/19 9:09 pm, Priyanka Saggu wrote: > Hi, > > The following package is ready to be uploaded (I also verified the > points listed on > http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Requesting_Sponsorship). > Although there is one Lintian warning i.e. "W: ruby-heapy: > binary-without-manpa

Re: RFS: ruby-default-value-for

2019-09-22 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hey, On 22/09/19 10:12 pm, Manas Kashyap wrote: > Sorry for that initially , i kept it in experimental, as its a > dependency of gitlab and it might break gitlab , so i kept it in > experimental . Please fix that. While at it, please fix the homepage URL in d/control, too. Lintian logs: https://p

Re: RFS: ruby-default-value-for

2019-09-22 Thread Manas Kashyap
Sorry for that initially , i kept it in experimental, as its a dependency of gitlab and it might break gitlab , so i kept it in experimental .

Re: RFS: ruby-default-value-for

2019-09-22 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hey, On 22/09/19 8:12 pm, Manas Kashyap wrote: > Hola everyone, > > I've updated the Debian package of the Ruby gem default-value-for. The > package was tested on sbuild and was successfully built. It is also > lintian-clean. I've > pushed the package to the personal forked salsa repo > https:/

RFS: ruby-heapy 0.1.4-1

2019-09-22 Thread Priyanka Saggu
Hi, The following package is ready to be uploaded (I also verified the points listed on http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Requesting_Sponsorship). Although there is one Lintian warning i.e. "W: ruby-heapy: binary-without-manpage usr/bin/heapy" which I am asked to ignore intentionally aft

RFS: ruby-benchmark-ips 2.7.2-1

2019-09-22 Thread Priyanka Saggu
Hi, The following package is ready to be uploaded (I also verified the points listed on http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Requesting_Sponsorship). Could you please sponsor it? ruby-benchmark-ips 2.7.2-1 [https://salsa.debian.org/priyankasaggu119-guest/ruby-benchmark-ips] Thank you! S

RFS: ruby-default-value-for

2019-09-22 Thread Manas Kashyap
Hola everyone,I've updated the Debian package of the Ruby gem default-value-for. The package was tested on sbuild and was successfully built. It is also lintian-clean. I've pushed the package to the personal forked salsa repo https://salsa.debian.org/Manas-kashyap-guest/ruby-default-value-for Th

Re: RFS: ruby-sawyer ruby-octokit

2019-09-22 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hey, On 22/09/19 6:21 pm, Samyak Jain wrote: > > > Thanks for pointing on the mistake, I have reverted the unwanted > patch, and have made necessary amendments. Lovely, thanks for the work! Just a small nitpick -> d/ch is missing an empty line above your name and email address. More importantly,

Re: RFS: ruby-sawyer ruby-octokit

2019-09-22 Thread Samyak Jain
On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 1:33 PM Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > Hey, > > On 22/09/19 12:16 pm, Pirate Praveen wrote: > > On 2019, സെപ്റ്റംബർ 22 2:37:51 AM IST, Utkarsh Gupta < > guptautkarsh2...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hey, > >> > >> On 21/09/19 1:55 pm, Samyak Jain wrote: > >>> Hey, > >>> > >>> I've updat

Re: RFS: ruby-sawyer ruby-octokit

2019-09-22 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hey, On 22/09/19 12:16 pm, Pirate Praveen wrote: > On 2019, സെപ്റ്റംബർ 22 2:37:51 AM IST, Utkarsh Gupta > wrote: >> Hey, >> >> On 21/09/19 1:55 pm, Samyak Jain wrote: >>> Hey, >>> >>> I've updated the Debian package of the Ruby gem sawyer and octokit. >> The package was tested on sbuild and was

Re: RFS: ruby-sawyer ruby-octokit

2019-09-22 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 2019, സെപ്റ്റംബർ 22 12:16:35 PM IST, Pirate Praveen wrote: >If some one already has ruby-sawyer 0.8.1 installed, updating >ruby-sawyer in the archive alone will not pull the updated version. So >we need to bump minimum version of ruby-sawyer in ruby-octokit and >minimum version of ruby-octo