Hey, On 22/09/19 9:09 pm, Priyanka Saggu wrote: > Hi, > > The following package is ready to be uploaded (I also verified the > points listed on > http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/Packaging#Requesting_Sponsorship). > Although there is one Lintian warning i.e. "W: ruby-heapy: > binary-without-manpage usr/bin/heapy" which I am asked to ignore > intentionally after having a discussion with the Debian-diaspora team. > > Could you please sponsor them? > > ruby-heapy 0.1.4-1 > [https://salsa.debian.org/priyankasaggu119-guest/ruby-heapy]
Things to fix: - Even with tests being present, tests aren't running yet. Please enable them. - Extended description is short. Please write a meaningful description for the same :) - No need of d/clean -> can't see Gemfile.lock. - Patch template present -> clean unnecessary stuff. Is patch even necessary? (I didn't check, though). - d/upstream/metadata -> "Name" is "heapy", not "ruby-heapy". - d/watch -> use version=4, clean line 2 and 3. - Last commit doesn't make sense, is it even required? - You committed .pc? Why? That fails two successive builds for me. - In your 4th commit, you're committing a change in the upstream file, that is so wrong :/ At this stage, I can't go on and on, there are so many commits, sometimes contradicting one another. My opinion would be to restart all over again and only commit once you think no more changes are needed for that particular file. Feel free to ping someone in the diaspora channel if you need more help :) Thanks for the work so far! Looking forward to seeing more packages. Best, Utkarsh
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
