Re: RFS: ruby-omniauth-ultraauth

Hey, On 15/08/19 10:44 pm, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > Hey, > > On 15/08/19 9:32 pm, Samyak Jain wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've prepared the Debian package of the Ruby gem omniauth-ultraauth. The >> package was tested on sbuild and was successfully built. It is also >> lintian-clean. I've >> uploaded the p

Re: RFS: ruby-omniauth-ultraauth

Hey, On 15/08/19 9:32 pm, Samyak Jain wrote: > Hi, > > I've prepared the Debian package of the Ruby gem omniauth-ultraauth. The > package was tested on sbuild and was successfully built. It is also > lintian-clean. I've > uploaded the package to the salsa repo which may be found at > https://sal

RFS: ruby-omniauth-ultraauth

Hi,I've prepared the Debian package of the Ruby gem omniauth-ultraauth. The package was tested on sbuild and was successfully built. It is also lintian-clean. I've uploaded the package to the salsa repo which may be found athttps://salsa.debian.org/samyak-jn-guest/ruby-omniauth-ultraauth This pac

Re: ruby-premailer build failure in salsa ci

On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 02:04:37PM +0530, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > Hey, > > On 15/08/19 8:20 am, Daniel Leidert wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, den 14.08.2019, 21:45 +0200 schrieb Daniel Leidert: > >> Am Mittwoch, den 14.08.2019, 22:21 +0500 schrieb Pirate Praveen: > >>> It fails with error, > >>> > >>> Enc

Re: Remove following repositories

Hey Antonio, On 13/08/19 4:58 am, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 03:20:30AM +0530, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: >> Requesting someone to delete the above repositories. You can use devscripts >> to do that as well. > deleting Thanks for doing that! :D While you're at it, could you (or s

Re: Ruby team BoF; here's what happened!

Hey Daniel, On 11/08/19 6:15 pm, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Am Montag, den 29.07.2019, 09:50 +0530 schrieb Utkarsh Gupta: > > [..] >> == For newcomers.. == > [..] >> - Document all the newcomer stuff (Sruthi is doing that!). > I've setup team pages [1] for debichem-team using the gitlab pages feature

Re: RFS: ruby-cucumber-expressions

Hi all, Please be very careful with simply updating random cucumber gems to their latest version. The current stable release of cucumber (3.1.2) depends on cucumber-expressions 6.0.1, and the next release (4.0.0) is stuck in beta due to problems with the google-protobuf gem. If the goal is to get

Re: autopkgtest passing, although gem2deb fails

On 15/08/19 3:29 pm, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 15.08.2019, 14:34 +0530 schrieb Utkarsh Gupta: > >> Maybe you could switch d/watch to point to github tarball instead and >> import the missing directories from there. > I'll move all the packages to the github tarballs within time. B

Re: autopkgtest passing, although gem2deb fails

Am Donnerstag, den 15.08.2019, 14:34 +0530 schrieb Utkarsh Gupta: > On 14/08/19 8:42 pm, Daniel Leidert wrote: > > Hi, > > > > can you please help me to examine, why this autopkgtest log shows "pass" > > instead of "fail"? gem2deb checking the dependencies actually fails missing > > jekyll. So why

Re: RFS: ruby-google-cloud-translate, ruby-maxminddb

On 15/08/19 3:02 pm, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > Hey, > > On 11/08/19 8:46 pm, Samyak Jain wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've prepared the Debian package of the Ruby gem google-cloud-translate, >> maxminddb. The package was tested on sbuild and >> was successfully built. It is also lintian-clean. I've >> uploa

Re: RFS: ruby-google-cloud-translate, ruby-maxminddb

Hey, On 11/08/19 8:46 pm, Samyak Jain wrote: > Hi, > > I've prepared the Debian package of the Ruby gem google-cloud-translate, > maxminddb. The package was tested on sbuild and > was successfully built. It is also lintian-clean. I've > uploaded the package to the salsa repo which may be found a

Re: autopkgtest passing, although gem2deb fails

Hey, On 14/08/19 8:42 pm, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Hi, > > can you please help me to examine, why this autopkgtest log shows "pass" > instead of "fail"? gem2deb checking the dependencies actually fails missing > jekyll. So why is this not reported as an autopkgtest failure? Any idea? > Neither auto

Re: team repo configuration on salsa

Hey, On 14/08/19 5:15 pm, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 14.08.2019, 03:44 +0530 schrieb Utkarsh Gupta: >> On 12/08/19 3:18 pm, Cédric Boutillier wrote: >>> >>> >>> (note that I didn't create the corresponding debian/salsa-ci.yml files >>> in the repos). >> The whole world knows by now,

Re: ruby-premailer build failure in salsa ci

Hey, On 15/08/19 8:20 am, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 14.08.2019, 21:45 +0200 schrieb Daniel Leidert: >> Am Mittwoch, den 14.08.2019, 22:21 +0500 schrieb Pirate Praveen: >>> It fails with error, >>> >>> Encoding::InvalidByteSequenceError: "\xE2" on US-ASCII >>> >>> full log https://sa

Re: RFS: ruby-cucumber-expressions

Hey, On 15/08/19 4:52 am, James Valleroy wrote: > Hello, > > This package is ready to be uploaded. It has a new upstream release. > Salsa CI shows passed with no errors. > > Could someone please sponsor the upload? Thanks to Sruthi, it is uploaded now! :D But a couple of things for the next updat

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Suggestions on ruby-task-list and node-deckar01-task-list

Quoting Pirate Praveen (2019-08-15 08:18:01) > > > On 2019, ഓഗസ്റ്റ് 14 11:05:03 PM IST, Jonas Smedegaard > mailto:jo...@jones.dk>> wrote: > > Quoting Pirate Praveen (2019-08-14 19:08:47) > >> Hi ruby and js teams, > >> > >> task_list project [1] provides both ruby and nodejs code from the >

Re: RFS: ruby-cucumber-expressions

On 15/08/2019 04:52, James Valleroy wrote: > Hello, > > This package is ready to be uploaded. It has a new upstream release. > Salsa CI shows passed with no errors. > > Could someone please sponsor the upload? Done! > > Regards, > James > Thanks, srud

Re: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Suggestions on ruby-task-list and node-deckar01-task-list

Le 15/08/2019 à 08:18, Pirate Praveen a écrit : > On 2019, ഓഗസ്റ്റ് 14 11:05:03 PM IST, Jonas Smedegaard > wrote: > > Quoting Pirate Praveen (2019-08-14 19:08:47) > > Hi ruby and js teams, task_list project [1] provides both ruby > and nodejs code from