Hey, On 14/08/19 8:42 pm, Daniel Leidert wrote: > Hi, > > can you please help me to examine, why this autopkgtest log shows "pass" > instead of "fail"? gem2deb checking the dependencies actually fails missing > jekyll. So why is this not reported as an autopkgtest failure? Any idea? > Neither autopkgtest nor gem2deb have changed recently. Is this related to the > apparmor issues reported in the log? > > https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-jekyll-data/-/jobs/276476
Heh, that is plain weird. Something more weird is this test log: https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-arbre/-/jobs/262117. Pinging the same at #salsaci. Also, just took a quick look at ruby-jekyll-data, it seems like rubygems.org doesn't ship the test/* directory, which means testing for autopkgtest doesn't make sense. Maybe you could switch d/watch to point to github tarball instead and import the missing directories from there. Best, Utkarsh
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
