Re: gem2deb: installing packages with the same layout as Rubygems

2016-01-30 Thread Balasankar C
On ശനി 30 ജനുവരി 2016 11:30 വൈകു, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > It is OK to use, yes. Even though I gave it pretty decent testing, it is > still sort of experimental, so if you use that please make sure the > resulting package actually works, and please report any issues you find > to the BTS. > > Dep

Re: RFS: ruby-tzinfo for jessie, fixes #798348

2016-01-30 Thread Hleb Valoshka
On 9/14/15, Hleb Valoshka <375...@gmail.com> wrote: Please upload ruby-tzinfo from jessie branch. >>> >>> Did you talk to -release about this already? >> >> No. It's a first time I need to update a package in stable, so I don't >> know the procedure. > > > I've reported #798949 and received ap

Bug#813237: transition: ruby2.3

2016-01-30 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi, We want to ship ruby2.3 in stretch, so we must start the transition now. The Ruby transitions are done in phases, as described in https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Ruby/InterpreterTrans

Re: gem2deb: installing packages with the same layout as Rubygems

2016-01-30 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 12:18:47PM +0530, Balasankar C wrote: > I see gem2deb being pushed to unstable. So, is using the same layout as > Rubygems ok? Or, is it not yet official? It is OK to use, yes. Even though I gave it pretty decent testing, it is still sort of experimental, so if you use that