Re: RFS: ruby-blankslate

2012-01-04 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 04/01/12 at 17:22 -0500, Sam Ruby wrote: > On 01/04/2012 04:41 PM, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > > >The correct solution is to make ruby-builder drop it's embedded copy of > >blankslate and depend on it instead. Ideally all the other embedded > >copies should also be dropped in favor of the standa

Re: RFS: ruby-blankslate

2012-01-04 Thread Marc Dequènes (Duck)
Coin, Quoting Lucas Nussbaum : On 04/01/12 at 19:41 -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote: The correct solution is to make ruby-builder drop it's embedded copy of blankslate and depend on it instead. Ideally all the other embedded copies should also be dropped in favor of the standalone package. I a

Re: RFS: ruby-blankslate

2012-01-04 Thread Sam Ruby
On 01/04/2012 04:41 PM, Antonio Terceiro wrote: The correct solution is to make ruby-builder drop it's embedded copy of blankslate and depend on it instead. Ideally all the other embedded copies should also be dropped in favor of the standalone package. FYI: that dependency is 1.8 only. - Sam

Re: RFS: ruby-blankslate

2012-01-04 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 04/01/12 at 19:41 -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Cédric Boutillier escreveu isso aí: > > On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 10:57:58PM -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > > Cédric Boutillier escreveu isso aí: > > > > Hi! > > > > > > > > I have pushed to the repository the packaging for ruby-blankslate. I

Re: RFS: ruby-blankslate

2012-01-04 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Cédric Boutillier escreveu isso aí: > On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 10:57:58PM -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > Cédric Boutillier escreveu isso aí: > > > Hi! > > > > > > I have pushed to the repository the packaging for ruby-blankslate. It is > > > a build-dependency of a dependency of the newest vers

Re: About apt-listbugs and ruby 1.9.x

2012-01-04 Thread Francesco Poli
On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 14:25:32 -0500 Sam Ruby wrote: > On 01/04/2012 02:00 PM, Francesco Poli wrote: > > > > As far as the test-unit library is concerned, it is used in a test > > suite currently run at package build time. > > It was mentioned as one of the libraries dropped from ruby 1.9.x in > > h

Re: About apt-listbugs and ruby 1.9.x

2012-01-04 Thread Sam Ruby
On 01/04/2012 02:00 PM, Francesco Poli wrote: As far as the test-unit library is concerned, it is used in a test suite currently run at package build time. It was mentioned as one of the libraries dropped from ruby 1.9.x in http://lists.debian.org/debian-ruby/2011/06/msg00050.html No further inv

About apt-listbugs and ruby 1.9.x

2012-01-04 Thread Francesco Poli
Hi everybody, I've been informed by Serafeim (Cc:ed) that apt-listbugs is being discussed as one of the blockers for the ruby 1.8.x → 1.9.x migration in Debian: http://lists.debian.org/debian-ruby/2012/01/msg00011.html Since I am one of the two co-maintainers of apt-listbugs, I would like to chime

RFS: dust and sigar

2012-01-04 Thread Praveen A
Hi, I have two packages ready for upload, both of these builds with pbuilder and is lintian clean. dust is a dependency for systemtimer (which is in turn dependency for diaspora), it also runs all tests successfully. sigar is a dependency for ohai transition to gem2deb. I ran ohai tests with sigar

Re: Changing the default version of Ruby to be 1.9

2012-01-04 Thread Sam Ruby
On 01/04/2012 08:58 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: I don't want to guess what problems you were seeing. Can you tell me of a specific command (complete with arguments) that doesn't work? It failed for me when I tried to install another package (try apt-get install tcsh), since apt-listbugs is call

Re: Changing the default version of Ruby to be 1.9

2012-01-04 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 04/01/12 at 08:37 -0500, Sam Ruby wrote: > On 01/04/2012 07:17 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > >> > >>Did I miss a step? > > > >ruby-switch hasn't migrated to testing yet, you need to use unstable. > > DOH! > > After installing unstable, i was able to run the following commands: > > # apt-get ins

Re: Changing the default version of Ruby to be 1.9

2012-01-04 Thread Sam Ruby
On 01/04/2012 07:17 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Did I miss a step? ruby-switch hasn't migrated to testing yet, you need to use unstable. DOH! After installing unstable, i was able to run the following commands: # apt-get install ruby1.9.1 # apt-get install ruby-switch # ruby-switch --set rub

Re: RFS: ruby-blankslate

2012-01-04 Thread Cédric Boutillier
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 10:57:58PM -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Cédric Boutillier escreveu isso aí: > > Hi! > > > > I have pushed to the repository the packaging for ruby-blankslate. It is > > a build-dependency of a dependency of the newest version of ruby-mocha. > > This simple package is l

Re: Changing the default version of Ruby to be 1.9

2012-01-04 Thread Praveen A
2012/1/4 Lucas Nussbaum : > I'm not involved in rails packaging, and I've never used it. But I > mainly see rails in Debian as a prerequisite to package rails-based > applications. For developers of web apps, I'm not sure it makes sense to > install rails using apt-get. > I'm very much interested

Re: Changing the default version of Ruby to be 1.9

2012-01-04 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 04/01/12 at 07:05 -0500, Sam Ruby wrote: > On 01/04/2012 02:26 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > >On 03/01/12 at 08:00 -0500, Sam Ruby wrote: > >>ruby-switch is not found using Ubuntu 11.10. > > > >Right. I try to keep track of what Ubuntu includes or not, but that's > >usually the first task to suffe

Re: Changing the default version of Ruby to be 1.9

2012-01-04 Thread Sam Ruby
On 01/04/2012 02:26 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: On 03/01/12 at 08:00 -0500, Sam Ruby wrote: ruby-switch is not found using Ubuntu 11.10. Right. I try to keep track of what Ubuntu includes or not, but that's usually the first task to suffer when I'm too busy. A good way to do that is to start fro