Re: ctioga vs ctioga2 (and webgen, amrita)

2011-04-26 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 26/04/11 at 21:41 +0200, Vincent Fourmond wrote: > Hi ! > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Lucas Nussbaum > wrote: > > Shouldn't we remove ctioga2, and only keep ctioga in the archive? > > In this case, the other way around. But as ctioga2 is quite fresh, > I'm waiting for others to swi

Re: ctioga vs ctioga2 (and webgen, amrita)

2011-04-26 Thread Vincent Fourmond
Hi ! On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Shouldn't we remove ctioga2, and only keep ctioga in the archive? In this case, the other way around. But as ctioga2 is quite fresh, I'm waiting for others to switch. I'm actually thinking of eventually having ctioga2 providing a

ctioga vs ctioga2 (and webgen, amrita)

2011-04-26 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, Shouldn't we remove ctioga2, and only keep ctioga in the archive? I don't think that we should continue to maintain several versions/branches of the same software. The same applies to webgen, and to amrita. Thanks, - Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ruby-requ...@lists.debian.org

Re: RFS: ruby-bcrypt

2011-04-26 Thread Vasudev Kamath
Thanks.. I'll try to write up the test case and finish the ruby-bcrypt. Regards On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 22/04/11 at 23:52 +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Lucas Nussbaum >> wrote: >> > On 22/04/11 at 23:35 +0530, Vasudev Kamat

Re: RFS: ruby-bcrypt

2011-04-26 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 22/04/11 at 23:52 +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote: > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Lucas Nussbaum > wrote: > > On 22/04/11 at 23:35 +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:21 PM, Lucas Nussbaum > >> wrote: > >> > On 22/04/11 at 21:25 +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote: > >> >> De