Bug#863031: RM: nikola/7.6.4-1

9.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_NZ, LC_CTYPE=en_NZ.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) -- .''`. martin f. krafft @martinkrafft : :' : proud Debian developer `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~mad

unblock: mdadm 3.1.1-1

Please unblock mdadm 3.1.1-1 and let it enter testing. My goal is to then move the experimental package to unstable and try to get it ready for squeeze too. The incremental assembly stuff is off-by-default. -- .''`. martin f. krafft Related projects: : :' : proud D

Binary rebuild of lbdb (#536481)

Dear release team, Can you please trigger a rebuild of lbdb, due to #536481? Thanks, -- .''`. martin f. krafft Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org

Re: Binary rebuild of lbdb (#536481)

also sprach Andreas Barth [2010.03.31.1134 +0200]: > * martin f krafft (madd...@debian.org) [100331 11:09]: > > Can you please trigger a rebuild of lbdb, due to #536481? > > why does the binnmu fix the problem? was something changed in a > dependency? The bugreport unfort

Re: Binary rebuild of lbdb (#536481)

also sprach Andreas Barth [2010.04.03.0957 +0200]: > Can we please have the full information in order to schedule the > necessary binNMUs? Thanks. After further investigation, it seems that the problem was specific to the NMU package, which was never uploaded. I don't remember where the NMU came

Re: Git for Squeeze

7;ll be best off reverting them. Thanks, -- .''`. martin f. krafft Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have better things to do than

Bug#596658: unblock: libapache-mod-musicindex/1.3.5-1

unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.35-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- .''`. martin f. krafft Re

Bug#596659: unblock: mdadm/3.1.4-1+8efb9d1

-1+8efb9d1) unstable; urgency=low * Added patch with Makefile fix from upstream (commit 8efb9d1) to fix compiler/linker problem on non-x86 architectures (closes: #595290). -- martin f. krafft Fri, 03 Sep 2010 10:45:01 +0200 mdadm (3.1.4-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release

Re: NMU of mdadm for squeeze-proposed-upates

also sprach Julien Cristau [2011.05.03.2004 +0200]: > I don't think that's worth a stable update on its own. It's apparently an inconvenience to our users, and fixable with a trivial patch. Are there arguments against it going into the next r-release? -- .''`. ma

Bug#641155: pu: package mdadm/3.1.4-1+8efb9d1+squeeze1

eeze1 package. -- .''`. martin f. krafft Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems "eve

freeze exception: net-tools 1.60-22

Please let net-tools into testing: net-tools (1.60-22) unstable; urgency=low * Add new command line option -W/--wide to netstat which prevents truncation of IPv6 addresses (Closes: #254243). Thanks Luar Roji. Thanks, -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

urgent RFH: please help test mdadm 2.6.7.2-1

27;t do what we want. + d305b6e623bed4767f9c97f01ca5db46482c430b Release mdadm-2.6.7.2 Thanks, -- .''`. martin f. krafft Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org

Re: urgent RFH: please help test mdadm 2.6.7.2-1

also sprach Luca Capello [2009.02.04.1208 +0100]: > I am going to re-install another HP Vectra VEi8 with the same > specifications as above: should I test our udeb, as well? Not necessary. Thanks! -- .''`. martin f. krafft Related projects: : :' : p

mdadm 2.6.7.2-1 uploaded, please unblock

se unblock. -- .''`. martin f. krafft Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems "i wish

Re: Bug#514818: lenny-backports not a recognised distribution

ts almost so) is IMHO unacceptable. Thanks, -- .''`. martin f. krafft Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing s

Re: Bug#514818: lenny-backports not a recognised distribution

p the diff minimal and because --bpo is a convenience method). also sprach Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt [2009.02.11.0927 +0100]: > Please upload. I suggest to also include the fix to --bpo. I'll gladly review the diff. -- .''`. martin f. krafft Related projects:

please unblock mdadm 2.6.8-12-gb47dff6-2

please unblock mdadm 2.6.8-12-gb47dff6-2 PS: why are udeb-providers blocked right after a stable release? -- .''`. martin f. krafft Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck

stable-p-u: mdadm 2.6.7.2-2

ase accept. -- .''`. martin f. krafft Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems "distru

Re: stable-p-u: mdadm 2.6.7.2-2

y fix it. Time to attack this ridiculous exim4 default choice. Monolithic setuid approaches must die. -- .''`. martin f. krafft Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp:

Re: stable-p-u: mdadm 2.6.7.2-2

x27;ll note that I didn't do anything like "breaking important packages". -- .''`. martin f. krafft Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org `- Debi

new release goal default-mta? (was: stable-p-u: mdadm 2.6.7.2-2)

ctions, I'll formulate a squeeze release goal and file the bugs. (updated mdadm coming to s-p-u on Thursday, are there other comments? http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2009/05/msg00024.html) -- .''`. martin f. krafft Related projects: : :' : proud Debian de

[SRM] mdadm 2.6.7.2-3, take two

s email started bouncing. -- .''`. martin f. krafft Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have better things to do than f

unblock request: mdadm 2.6.9-3

prevent ctrl-c from terminating the bugscript prematurely. -- martin f. krafft Tue, 05 May 2009 11:46:22 +0200 mdadm (2.6.9-2) unstable; urgency=low * Fix the check of whether mdadm.conf defines all devices known to the system; thanks Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn (closes: #525655). * No

unblock request: mdadm 2.6.9-3

Please unblock mdadm 2.6.9-3 to that I can move 3.0 into unstable. -- .''`. martin f. krafft Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduckhttp://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian -

Re: unblock request: mdadm 2.6.9-3

g stanza order (which is chronological) without differentiating between experimental and unstable? Thanks for spotting this. I hope I fixed it now. -- .''`. martin f. krafft Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `

Re: unblock request: mdadm 2.6.9-3

present; it has no effect > on the changelog parsing so 2.6.9-3 is still believed to contain the > bug. Marking it as fixed in that version isn't right since the bug > never existed there, but in this case it is the means of telling the > BTS that it shouldn't be treated as

Re: unblock request: mdadm 2.6.9-3

n a version which is in experimental. Serious time to start auto-generating changelogs from commit messages... -- .''`. martin f. krafft Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck

Re: Bits from the release team and request for discussion

it. If it's related to Canonical, then include a statement from Canonical how they expect to support that. 0. http://derstandard.at/1246541995003/Interview-Shuttleworth-about-GNOME-30---Whats-good-whats-missing-what-needs-work Hope this helps, -- .''`. martin f. krafft

Re: Bits from the release team and request for discussion

nt and they dont. I phrased it badly then. It's exactly points like this which need to be addressed explicitly: why are we doing this? And iff Canonical/Ubuntu is part of the reason, then state exactly where the benefits for Debian are, and ideally how this decision was reached in the firs

Time-based freezes

). 0. http://lists.debian.org/debian-announce/2009/msg9.html Would it be possible to get an updated statement? Will there be regular freezes from now on? What period? I think we should issue a press release about this. Thanks, -- .''`. martin f. krafft Related projects:

Re: Time-based freezes

also sprach martin f krafft [2009.10.26.1054 +0100]: > As far as I can tell, the press release during DebConf9[0] is still > taken to be the official position of the Debian project, at least if > I scan the pertinent media sources. > > Luk's e-mail updates have not overly e

Re: Time-based freezes

eeze date announced. No announcement about any of this was made, so you cannot really blame the media for assuming that the goals of July are still current. Does this make sense and explain my motivation now? -- .''`. martin f. krafft Related projects: : :' : proud Debi

Re: Time-based freezes

nnouncement was never seen or absorbed by anyone. Maybe the two were too close to each other. So http://lists.debian.org/debian-announce/2009/msg00010.html together with the announcement about a tentative goal March is still current? -- .''`. martin f. krafft Related projects: :

please unblock mdadm 2.5.6-9

Hi release team, please unblock mdadm 2.5.6-9. I only added two debconf translations: http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/mdadm/news/20070224T160206Z.html Thanks! -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

please unfreeze logcheck 1.2.55

to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixin

Re: please unfreeze logcheck 1.2.55

list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fi

Re: please unfreeze logcheck 1.2.55

also sprach Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.03.18.2317 +0100]: > Sorry, only RC bugs are considered anymore. Okay, thanks for the explanation. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :&#x

not-yet-RC fix for mdadm

#416658 is an easy fix to the mdadm initramfs hooks. May it go into etch? If so, urgency=high upload? -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, a

Re: not-yet-RC fix for mdadm

also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.03.31.1206 +0200]: > #416658 is an easy fix to the mdadm initramfs hooks. May it go into > etch? If so, urgency=high upload? changes: http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-mdadm?op=comp&[EMAIL PROTECTED]&[EMAIL PROTECTED] --

Re: not-yet-RC fix for mdadm

lk to me and/or the bug report about these things. That udev maintainer could also explain how a script in /sbin with a manpage and all does not constitute a public interface. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: Debian release cycle for enterprise ?

s. If I were you, I'd find similarly minded people and pool resources. But even though I said I agree, I don't think I'll join such an endeavour since it would conflict directly with my activities as developer of Debian unstable. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the

molly-guard for r1

opies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better things to

unblock mdadm/2.6.3+200709292116+4450e59-3

subject says it all; please. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better things to do tha

netconf & lenny: possible freeze exception?

ng already talked to Andi on IRC, I understand that you have reservations about making exceptions during the freeze. This is why I bring up the issue now already, in the hope that it won't need an "exception" anymore by the time August comes around. Cheers, -- .''`.

please unblock mdadm 2.6.4-2

DST change (closes: #449244). * Bump DH compatibility level to 6; no changes required. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info

RM: jppy/unstable [ia64] -- NVIU; ia64 build screws up, thus preventing testing migration

http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=jppy http://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=jppy No idea what's going on, but since it builds everywhere else, this is likely an ia64 problem. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : prou

logcheck 1.2.68 freeze exception

y problem" rule to also ignore "bad certificate" errors. - added rule to ignore "SSL23_GET_CLIENT_HELLO:unknown protocol" messages. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer, author, admi

freeze exception: ttf-aenigma 0.0.20080510.dfsg-1

get the package into shape for Debian, convincing upstream to let us distribute it in a Free fashion. It would be a real shame if lenny users couldn't benefit from that. Thanks, -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer, autho

Re: freeze exception: ttf-aenigma 0.0.20080510.dfsg-1

also sprach Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.09.20.2303 +0100]: > Unblocked. It will be removed the second there's an rc bug. Sounds fair, thanks! I'll make sure this happens if there is an RC bug. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL P

Re: which 2.6 kernel will be in sarge?

also sprach Luis M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.02.08.0159 +0100]: > If you look at the changelog for 2.6.11 you will see what the root of > the problem lies. Please do not use 2.6.10. Wait for 2.6.11 or use > 2.6.9, which is probably the best so far. (Xandros 3 is using 2.6.9 > and so do other distro

please accept zope 2.6.4-1.8

! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! "hesitation of any ki

Re: vim-vimoutliner -- please allow into sarge

are going to make a big difference. > 3) to create -6 version of package without a mechanism for > loading /etc/vim/vimoutlinerrc Does upstream support it? -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :

Re: vim-vimoutliner -- please allow into sarge

deems it an inappropriate change for a frozen target, I accept this decision. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `-

Re: davfs2 0.2.3-1.1 needs an update in sarge

package available. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Inval

Re: vim-vimoutliner -- please allow into sarge

Debian doubled It's not about being offensive or intrusive, it's about trying to get sarge out the door with stable software. I think the release team approved it, so we can settle this discussion. Thanks for your good work for Debian! -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me;

Re: Volunteers for upgrade reports

can't wait to see results. :) -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a sys

Re: Professional blame assigner, at your service

ian.org/309209 -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a s

Re: Professional blame assigner, at your service

also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.16.1540 +0200]: > > I'd like to volunteer to help. > > http://bts.turmzimmer.net/details.php Sorry, I had not read your message correctly. Ignore my blather. -- Please do not send copies of list mail

please accept gmailfs-0.4

gmailfs 0.4 into sarge. (I already talked about this with vorlon) -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when yo

Re: please accept gmailfs-0.4

also sprach Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.18.0834 +0200]: > Yes, approved. You rock. Thanks. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian deve

Re: Bug#309591: pmount: DANGEROUS default settings (sync)

s and flash technology, but async is just calling for trouble. If it were possible to cause flushing every 10 seconds or so, this would be good. I did not research this further. Thanks for your work (and pmount!) -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .&#

please accept zope-testcase 0.9.6

ope packages anyway. This would be a shame. Please let it through. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - whe

Re: openswan in sarge

bug to be release-critical. I can confirm this. I was not aware of the RC bug. +1 on Bdale's suggestion. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, user, an

Re: please accept zope-testcase 0.9.6

am not sure whether this was actually my fault). -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better thing

what to do about fluxbox?

list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! windoze nt cra

Re: what to do about fluxbox?

also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.20.2207 +0200]: > The bug only exists in the 0.9.11-1 package, and has been fixed by > the 0.9.12-1 package, which has been sitting in unstable for 23 > days, so it theoretically should have made it in to sarge before the

Re: what to do about fluxbox?

nto a mail to d-r? 01:32 < ifvoid> sure 01:32 < ifvoid> feel free to include the screenshot, too 01:33 < ifvoid> http://matilda.phys.uu.nl/~bas/screens/screen48.png had both faulty install and the ok install next to each other -- Please do not send copies of list mail to m

Re: what to do about fluxbox?

. So the question is: why did Matt fix the other bug by removing diversions? -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian -

[solved] what to do about fluxbox?

me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as ke

Re: what to do about fluxbox?

Steve (vorlon) and Martin (madduck) decided this > was sarge-rc. #310050 -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- D

please accept adduser-ng 0.1.2-1.1 (RC fix)

on w3m for plain text documentation generation from HTML. eb7a7a1d759319b295168bd38193fedd 797 admin extra adduser-ng_0.1.2-1.1.dsc b245a02962dfe354055888530f6e0a64 70446 admin extra adduser-ng_0.1.2-1.1.tar.gz -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .'&#x

Re: please accept adduser-ng 0.1.2-1.1 (RC fix)

ies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.ne

libcwd/non-free

other architectures have been left in, but I would be satisfied if it at least came for i386. Thanks for your consideration. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian develope

please accept adduser-ng 0.1.2-1.2

also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.23.2245 +0200]: > No particular reason except that Roger's patch did not do so? > Anyway, nochunks is really just a convenience thing (single page, as > opposed to multiple page), so does it really matter? I give you t

mdadm again (pending 1.9.0-3 fixes 2 RC bugs)

list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! until lions have

Re: libcwd/non-free

Do you really need me to list them? Cheers, -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixin

mdadm udeb and d-i

ug stuff, this is a heads-up for a udeb replacement for d-i. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better th

Re: libcwd/non-free

to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! &qu

Re: libcwd/non-free

debian-legal). I don't think consensus ever existed on debian-legal. For what it's worth, I disagree with you. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, a

Re: zope bugs

do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use sub

Re: Bug#310644: zope bugs

est solution... zope2.7 handles this by not creating an instance in postinst. We will use the same approach also for zope 2.6, but not before sarge. Anyway, do people want me to fix this? If so, how? -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. kr

Re: Bug#310644: zope bugs

preseed the debconf cache, > or not expect non-interactive installs to work. Right now it fails even with priority==high. My patch would create the behaviour you describe. Let me know if I should upload. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. m

Re: Bug#310644: zope bugs

elease notes that the use of Zope 2.6 is highly discouraged, and Zope 2.7 should be used instead, if at all possible. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin

Re: Bug#310644: zope bugs

other RC things then. Can we include a note in the release notes? I can draft it. Whom do I talk to? -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `

Re: Bug#299623: Failure to upgrade mdadm when using udev is RC bug, I think...

judge it, but vorlon took care of it, and I do trust his judgement. From a cursory look, it seems that the only downside of the fix is a stray error message for devfs users. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: Release Notes - Proposed last minute changes

d really not use the canonical names, but the code names instead. I think this is a bug in apt-setup. Though you are right in pointing this out as a potential problem. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Release team for etch?

gh of a reason to get etch out in a year! -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do

Re: OOImpress unusable : Please Do something about bug #273298 #273335

o be absolutely unimportant. Who get's to say what's important and what's not? -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, and user `. `'` `- Debian

Re: OOImpress unusable : Please Do something about bug #273298 #273335

not really questioning its importance; it's not important to me, but I realise it is very important to most. The OP was requesting some sort of special treatment though, which I don't think was properly backed up. -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .'&

final freeze and vacation

oving the freeze date back a couple of days, or do you anticipate delays anyway? cheers, -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, and user `. `'` `- Debian - wh

Re: Release update: lib transitions, toolchain fixes, buildd backlog

I wanted to drop a quick thank you for the update and state that with mails like this, I feel very comfortable with you guys handling the release. It really feels like we are working as a team. Keep it up! -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .''`. martin

Re: Suggestion: Release sarge without security support

to lists; I read them! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Drop the minor release number

also sprach Bob Proulx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.07.08.1750 +0200]: > Counting numbers start at one. Not in the computer world. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Deb

Re: Drop the minor release number

also sprach Bob Proulx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.07.08.1854 +0200]: > How do you explain RCS/CVS? I am sorry to everyone who tries. Same applies to subversion. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTEC

Bug#857347: Acknowledgement (unblock: reclass/1.4.1-2)

I approve of this upload and back the request for a freeze exception. -- .''`. martin f. krafft @martinkrafft : :' : proud Debian developer `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems digit

Bug#745541: Any news?

Any news on this bug? -- .''`. martin f. krafft @martinkrafft : :' : proud Debian developer `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems digital_signature_gpg.asc Description: Digital signatur

Bug#745541: Any news?

Thank you! -- .''`. martin f. krafft @martinkrafft : :' : proud Debian developer `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems there's an old proverb that says just about whatever you want it to. dig

Bug#773319: pre-approval: unblock: sudo/1.8.10p3-1.1; possibly sudo/1.8.11p2-1.1?

unlikely event that we need to push p2-1.2 or p2-2 to jessie, we would need to use t-p-u to bypass unstable. -- .''`. martin f. krafft @martinkrafft : :' : proud Debian developer `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck `- Debian - when you have better things to do t

Bug#773319: pre-approval: unblock: sudo/1.8.10p3-1.1; possibly sudo/1.8.11p2-1.1?

-1.1 via t-p-u. Doable? -- .''`. martin f. krafft @martinkrafft : :' : proud Debian developer `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems "mirrors should refle

Bug#773319: pre-approval: unblock: sudo/1.8.10p3-1.1; possibly sudo/1.8.11p2-1.1?

should be reserved for stable updates and not used yet. But if the release team suggested that, then I'll rest my case. -- .''`. martin f. krafft @martinkrafft : :' : proud Debian developer `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck `- Debian - when you have bette

  1   2   >