-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
control: tag -1 security
On Thu, 2021-05-20 at 15:25 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> Tags: buster
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: pu
> X-D
-plugin (0.8.10-2) buster; urgency=medium
+
+ * d/patches: backport upstream port to 2.0 met.no API
+(Closes: #970259, #969747)
+
+ -- Yves-Alexis Perez Sun, 18 Apr 2021 19:23:36 +0200
+
xfce4-weather-plugin (0.8.10-1) unstable; urgency=medium
[ Unit 193 ]
diff -Nru
xfce4-weather-plu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, 2021-04-19 at 20:07 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> +xfce4-weather-plugin (0.8.10-2) buster; urgency=medium
>
> 0.8.10-1+deb10u1 is the more conventional version number, but as there
> doesn't appear to have been a -2 in the Debian archive p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi release team,
a security bug (#988394) was recently found in Thunar 4.16. The fix went in
4.16.7, then a regression was identified and fixed in 4.16.8.
Testing has 4.16.3, while sid has 4.16.4 (I missed the deadline by a few days
back in time).
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Thu, 2021-05-13 at 20:26 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Yves-Alexis,
>
> On 13-05-2021 19:13, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > I'll upload 4.16.8 to sid anyway so we have some unstable exposure, but
> I'd
> > w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Wed, 2021-05-19 at 18:57 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Unblocked.
Thanks!
- --
Yves-Alexis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE8vi34Qgfo83x35gF3rYcyPpXRFsFAmClX9UACgkQ3rYcyPpX
RFtwcggAr2F53H/wxFr0Ing3gWYM0re6iUwAPbJ+qsj4i
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: strongs...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:strongswan
Hi release team,
I've updated the strongSwan package in sid few days ago to fix a
security issue (only pres
log
@@ -1,3 +1,18 @@
+strongswan (5.9.8-5) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * No-change upload for source-only upload.
+
+ -- Yves-Alexis Perez Fri, 03 Mar 2023 18:56:58 +0100
+
+strongswan (5.9.8-4) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * d/patches: libtls-Fix-authentication-bypass-and-expired-pointer ad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi release team,
Xfce 4.14 was recently released. We started doing the packaging in
experimental for the 4.13 pre-releases, and now that Buster is out we would
like to proceed with the 4.14 upload to unstable.
As far as I can tell, there are two co
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
the Xfce team would like to upload the Xfce 4.14 release to unstable
(most packages pre-release have been uploaded to experimental). One
library package, xfconf, has a transition (al
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
the Xfce team would like to upload the Xfce 4.14 release to unstable
(most packages pre-release have been uploaded to experimental).
Panel plugins might have a tight dependency to the p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Wed, 2019-08-21 at 08:33 +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Ack, please go ahead.
Thanks, I've started uploading stuff.
> Please let us know what will need binNMUs and when.
Sure, I'll let stuff settle a bit after uploading everything and I'll let y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Wed, 2019-08-21 at 09:55 +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Could you check if
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/xfce4-panel.html matches
> your expectation for the packages affected by this transition?
I'm a bit surprised we have so few l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sun, 2019-08-25 at 19:46 +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> jmw already scheduled the binNMUs already so everything but
> xfce4-sntray-plugin has been rebuilt successfully by now (some of the
> builds are still pending uploads though).
Thanks for the
p.conf: follow buster branch
+
+ -- Yves-Alexis Perez Sun, 29 Sep 2019 17:14:37 +0200
+
libimobiledevice (1.2.1~git20181030.92c5462-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream snapshot
diff -Nru libimobiledevice-1.2.1~git20181030.92c5462/debian/gbp.conf
libimobiledevice-1.2.1~git20181030.92c5
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu libimobiledevice_1.2.1~git20181030.92c5462-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild
against newer libusbmuxd"
Hi,
I recently updated the idevices stack in Debian (libplist, libusbmuxd,
libimob
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sat, 2019-10-05 at 15:45 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> nmu libimobiledevice_1.2.1~git20181030.92c5462-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sun, 2019-10-20 at 21:33 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Sorry for taking so long, but I have the feeling that the binNMU isn't
> appropriate. I take the silence from the other team members to mean
> something similar.
To be honest, I'm a bit disappo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, 2019-10-22 at 17:12 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> Unfortunately, I can't just revert the patch so that means basically reverting
> the whole stuff to the previous snapshot (I'm not too sure how well gbp handle
> that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Fri, 2019-11-08 at 20:53 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Sorry for the delay in getting back to you.
Yeah, this time it's me who's really sorry.
>
> That sounds OK, but it looks like the fix still hasn't made it to sid,
> so I'm tagging this as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Fri, 2019-11-08 at 21:55 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-11-08 at 20:53 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Sorry for the delay in getting back to you.
>
> Yeah, this time it's me who's really sorry.
> &g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Thu, 2019-10-24 at 11:44 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Just go ahead with the package rename / soname bump, no need to revert it and
> then do the transition in this case, given the rdeps are going to build fine
> so
> there will be litt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sat, 2019-12-07 at 20:11 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Sorry, I replied to the wrong bug. I'll upload the isolated fix soon,
> > likely this weekend, thanks.
>
> Just to keep this up-to-date, the libimobiledevice upload made it to
> sid, but
30.92c5462/debian/changelog 2020-09-23
20:24:18.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+libimobiledevice (1.2.1~git20181030.92c5462-2+deb10u1) buster; urgency=medium
+
+ * d/patches: partial support for iOS 14
+
+ -- Yves-Alexis Perez Wed, 23 Sep 2020 20:24:18 +0200
+
libimobiledevice (1.2.1~git201810
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Sat, 2020-10-10 at 09:21 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >
> > I backported some of the changes to stable (the snapshot and backup
> > protocols versions, unfortunately the debug part would require
> > backporting others commits).
>
> Please go
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, 2020-10-26 at 16:18 +0200, Jonathan Carter (highvoltage) wrote:
> To vote for your favourite theme, visit the following website and click
> on the "Bullseye Artwork Survey" button. From there, you can rank your
> choices from the available op
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi release team,
the upstream Xfce project is about to release the 4.16 version of their
desktop environment. We packaged the various pre-releases in experimental and
they're mostly ready to be uploaded to unstable.
I wanted to give you a status up
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Owner: debian-x...@lists.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hi,
orage is unmaintained upstream and hasn't been ported to GTK-3 Xfce
library variants. It's currently preventing xfce4-panel to migrate to
testing.
A remov
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
X-Debbugs-Cc: andr...@e-quake.org
Hi,
xfce4-equake-plugin is not compatible with the 4.16 release of the Xfce
desktop environement, and thus FTBFS in unstable right now, and prevents
migration of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Wed, 2021-01-06 at 17:30 -0800, Jeroen van Aart wrote:
> I am working on a fix, I hope to have it available soon.
Hi Jeroen, thanks and sorry for the rush on this. If you need some testing
don't hesitate to ask.
Regards,
- --
Yves-Alexis
-B
On Mon, 2016-10-17 at 16:48 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> To the lightdm maintainers: I intend to NMU (to DELAYED/7) to apply
> the patch, unless you object.
Yeah, please refrain. What I needed is an upstream comment on this, which
didn't happen. I'll ping them again on the upstream tracker because
control: retitle -1 Subject: nmu: xfce4-clipman-plugin_2:1.4.1-1
control: reassign -1 release.debian.org
control: User -1 release.debian@packages.debian.org
control: Usertags -1 binnmu
On Tue, 2017-01-17 at 20:02 +0200, Shai Berger wrote:
> Package: xfce4-clipman
> Version: 2:1.4.1-1
> Severi
Hi teams,
[first of all, I'm writing this with my linux-grsec hat, not my Debian
security team member hat, obviously]
As you may know, src:linux-grsec was accepted in unstable earlier this year.
As a quick summary, this is a source linux package (forked from and
periodically rebased against src:l
On mer., 2016-02-03 at 14:37 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> [Context: packages shipping /bin with “funny” permissions, seen in stable.]
>
> Yves-Alexis Perez (2016-02-03):
> >
> > On mar., 2016-02-02 at 17:16 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > >
> > >
On mer., 2016-03-02 at 20:06 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Before considering that, did anyone approch grsecurity whether we can get
> access to the grsecurity stable patches? We would most definitely have Debian
> funds to become grsecurity sponsors to obtain access to stable patches.
I thin
t-1.2 dropped, included in backports
+above.
+
+ -- Yves-Alexis Perez Fri, 12 May 2017 10:24:12 +0200
+
xfce4-weather-plugin (0.8.3-2) unstable; urgency=low
[ Yves-Alexis Perez ]
diff -Nru
xfce4-weather-plugin-0.8.3/debian/patches/0001-Make-plugin-ready-for-met.no-locationforecast-1.2-AP
nf added, following DEP-14
+ * d/watch: use HTTPS protocol
+ * d/gbp.conf adjusted for buster branch
+ * d/control: drop Emanuele, Simon, Lionel and Stefan from uploaders
+ * d/control: update standards version to 4.2.1
+
+ -- Yves-Alexis Perez Thu, 07 Feb 2019 17:29:33 +0100
+
+gigolo (0.4.2
hch could lead to an infinite loop and a denial of service
+(CVE-2017-9023).
+
+ -- Yves-Alexis Perez Mon, 29 May 2017 21:52:41 +0200
+
strongswan (5.5.1-3) unstable; urgency=medium
[ Christian Ehrhardt ]
diff -Nru
strongswan-5.5.1/debian/patches/CVE-2017-9022_insufficient_input_validation_
On Sat, 2017-05-13 at 13:51 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> Tags: jessie
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: pu
>
> Hi,
>
> xfce4-weather-plugin uses met.no as source for weather information.
&
On Wed, 2017-06-28 at 00:24 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> This looks good to me (also tested locally without then with the patch
> series). Feel free to upload, targetting jessie; thanks.
Thanks! Should I target 'jessie' (not recognized by dch -r) or 'oldstable-
proposed-updates'?
Regards,
--
On Wed, 2017-06-28 at 15:13 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 28/06/17 12:38, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-06-28 at 00:24 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > > This looks good to me (also tested locally without then with the patch
> > > series). Feel
On Wed, 2018-05-09 at 23:46 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> It is unlikely that any further fix will be forthcoming on the kernel
> side, so I believe that we need to do one of:
>
> 1. Add entropy to the kernel during boot; either:
>a. Improve systemd-random-seed
>b. Recommend use of haveged
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, 2018-06-05 at 15:44 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Context: https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-team/linux/merge_requests/30
>
> Many thanks for the heads-up. I'll be on the lookout for a possible
> late ABI bump then. Feel free to poke me wh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, 2018-08-13 at 14:49 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On June, 26th 2018, thunar 1.8.1-1 was uploaded to unstable [1]
> which introduced a new version of the libthunar library.
Indeed.
>
> Normally. this should be coincide with a t
On 15/02/2010 20:19, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 13:47 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
>> reassign release.debian.org
>> thanks
>>
>> nmu xfburn_0.4.3-1 . amd64 . -m "rebuild against proper libxfce4util"
>
> As requested on IRC, th
On dim., 2010-03-14 at 21:42 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Dear fellow developers,
[…]
>
> It would be great if every team on track could send us a short mail to
> debian-release@lists.debian.org and if every team that still faces work
> could write up a corresponding bug report filed against relea
On mer., 2010-03-17 at 16:39 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>
> Evolution : business as usual, all packages depending on libcamel,
> evolution, evolution-data-server or libedata-cal will need a transition.
> Yves-Alexis told me he’ll upload as much as possible of it to
> experimental.
It's alread
Adding release team on CC so they are aware of the transition. @Release
team, this is a very early warning, the 4.6/4.8 transition won't happen
for squeeze (though the libxfce4panel split might).
On jeu., 2010-04-29 at 22:45 +0200, Lionel Le Folgoc wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I've been thinking lately
On sam., 2010-05-15 at 17:09 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-03-28 at 13:54 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > 4 - evolution & gtkhtml3.14
> >
> > Sourceful uploads:
> > evolution
> > evolution-data-server
done
> > evolution-exchange
this one FTBFS with an e
On sam., 2010-05-15 at 17:09 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Sourceful uploads:
> > evolution
> > evolution-data-server
> > gtkhtml3.14
Could we have binNMUs for depending packages?
apt-rbdepends is:
apt-rbdepends () {
grep-dctrl -F Build-Depends "$1" -s Package
/va
On 18/05/2010 14:28, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mardi 18 mai 2010 à 08:29 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez a écrit :
>>>> evolution-exchange
>>
>> this one FTBFS with an error I've not yet investigated:
>>
>>> Making all in addressbook
>>>
On 18/05/2010 08:29, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On sam., 2010-05-15 at 17:09 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> On Sun, 2010-03-28 at 13:54 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>>> 4 - evolution & gtkhtml3.14
>>>
>>> Sourceful uploads:
>>> evol
On mer., 2010-05-19 at 11:40 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> >>> evolution-rss
just uploaded to unstable
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hey,
Xfce 4.6.2 has just been released. It's a bugfix release, without
soname/shlibs changes, as far as I know. I'd like to upload it asap, but
I don't want to mess with already ongoing transitions (though I'm not
sure which would it would be entangled with, but just in case).
Concerned sources p
On sam., 2010-05-22 at 16:16 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Hi,
> The set of packages you listed looks ok; adding the package split may be
> an option.
We decided not to proceed with the split for now, allowing 4.6.2 to
reach testing without too much hassle. If we decide to split, we'll come
up
On sam., 2010-05-15 at 17:09 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-03-28 at 13:54 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > 4 - evolution & gtkhtml3.14
> >
> > Sourceful uploads:
> > evolution
> > evolution-data-server
> > evolution-exchange
> > evolution-rss
> >
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hey,
now that we have xfce4-panel 4.6.2 in testing, would it be possible to
schedule binNMUs of depending packages so they pick the << 4.7.0 shlib?
Following list should work:
nmu orage 4
On dim., 2010-06-06 at 12:54 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
Hmhm, sorry for the duplicates, updated list:
>
> Following list should work:
>
> nmu orage 4.6.1-1 . ALL . -m "rebuild against updated xfce4-panel shlibs"
> nmu remmina-xfce 0.7.3-1 . ALL . -m "rebui
Hey,
evo 2.30.2 has just been released, and I'd like to upload it soon, so it
fixes yet another bunch of bugs (which I don't have all identified all).
The thing is, the evolution pack usually needs to migrate altogether
(gtkhtml+eds+evo) or we experience crashes. We have shlibs and
dependencies to
On 21/06/2010 07:40, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> So yeah, that means another
> transition (even though it should be shorter this time) so I'm asking a
> place in the queue so I don't bother ongoing transitions with evo.
>
As I was asked, it's not really a transition, it
On ven., 2010-06-25 at 15:22 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> Please proceed with the uploads.
done, thanks!
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hey,
evolution (and gtkhtml3.13/evolution-data-server) 2.30.3 was recently
released. It's a bugfix release, though the diffs might be a bit large,
so I'd like to ask permission to upload to unstable and then a freeze
exception so it ends up in Squeeze.
I've not yet identified all the (Debian) bug
On lun., 2010-08-16 at 00:15 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 14:11:17 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
>
> > evolution-data-server.debdiff
> > 22 files changed, 1419 insertions(+), 570 deletions(-)
> >
> Seems ok to upload, with some aging in un
First, congrats for the release, thanks to everyone involved!
On dim., 2011-02-06 at 01:47 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>
> As with Squeeze, we'd ask that you co-ordinate particularly large
> transitions or changes; if your plans involve major toolchain changes or
> otherwise have the potential
On mar., 2011-02-08 at 15:16 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Note that the OpenVZ, VServer and Xen flavours have been dropped and
> will not come back. OpenVZ and VServer users should migrate to LXC
> (Linux containers, using the cgroups and namespace features). Xen
> support in mainline Linux is i
On mer., 2011-02-09 at 17:47 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 06:37:22PM +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > On mar., 2011-02-08 at 15:16 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > Note that the OpenVZ, VServer and Xen flavours have been dropped and
> > >
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Hey,
I use to draw testing migrations graphs (on
http://molly.corsac.net/~corsac/debian/testing/) and since the upgrade
to Squeeze they are broken. A little be of investigation led me to the
fact that BeautifulSoup (which I use to parse
http://releas
ebian/thunar-volman.xml:
+- disable device automount/autorun/autobrowse by default
+ * debian/rules:
+- install thunar-volman.xml
+
+ -- Yves-Alexis Perez Fri, 18 Feb 2011 08:34:05 +0100
+
thunar-volman (0.3.80-4) unstable; urgency=low
[ Stefan Ott ]
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- t
On ven., 2011-02-18 at 22:13 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> would it be possible to make a stable upload, targeted at 6.0.1 or
> 6.0.2, to disable default automount/autobrowse in thunar-volman?
>
> It's only a matter of shipping a config file, so the following diff
> sho
Hey,
it seems that plymouth spacefun script doesn't work fine with dual
monitor setup (#613249). I've checked the patch on a dual monitor setup
and it seems to do the job just fine so I'd like to push it for 6.0.1 or
6.0.2.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
On ven., 2011-02-18 at 23:13 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On ven., 2011-02-18 at 22:13 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > would it be possible to make a stable upload, targeted at 6.0.1 or
> > 6.0.2, to disable default automount/autobrowse in thunar-volman?
> >
>
On ven., 2011-02-18 at 23:16 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> it seems that plymouth spacefun script doesn't work fine with dual
> monitor setup (#613249). I've checked the patch on a dual monitor setup
> and it seems to do the job just fine so I'd like to push it for
On ven., 2011-02-18 at 22:13 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> would it be possible to make a stable upload, targeted at 6.0.1 or
> 6.0.2, to disable default automount/autobrowse in thunar-volman?
I've uploaded 0.3.80-5 to unstable, waiting for your ack for
0.3.80-4squeeze1.
Regard
On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 18:00 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 22:13 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > would it be possible to make a stable upload, targeted at 6.0.1 or
> > 6.0.2, to disable default automount/autobrowse in thunar-volman?
> &
On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 18:00 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Isn't it auto*run* which opens a vulnerability, and thus should be
> disabled by default?
Autorun can leads to somehow direct exploitation.
>
> Disabling automount & autobrowse seem to be security overkill.
Autobrowse means a file manager
On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 17:51 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 23:16 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > it seems that plymouth spacefun script doesn't work fine with dual
> > monitor setup (#613249). I've checked the patch on a dual monit
On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 18:30 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Ah.
>
> Turn off thumbnailing of removable media?
Why? I do like having thumbnails of my pictures when I plug an sdcard
from my camera.
Anyway this is not really a topic for debian-release imho.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
De
On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 21:10 +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Yves-Alexis,
>
> am Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 10:13:30PM +0100 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
> > would it be possible to make a stable upload, targeted at 6.0.1 or
> > 6.0.2, to disable default automount/autobrowse in thunar-volman?
> >
> > It'
Hey RT,
now that all the Xfce 4.8 bits have been accepted to experimental, we'd
like to upload to unstable. As it's a new major upstream release,
there's quite some dependencies involved, so I guess you're not against
having a little summary so we can coordinate that upload in order to not
break a
On ven., 2011-03-11 at 14:53 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Currently blocked by (at least):
> #614526: contacts FTBFS
I'm currently VAC and AFK (away from my key) but this one at least looks
easy to fix so doing an NMU (maybe with maintainer content) is
definitely doable for me next week.
--
Yve
On ven., 2011-03-11 at 19:45 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 14:53:58 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
>
> > Currently blocked by (at least):
> > #614526: contacts FTBFS
>
> corsac says that has an easy fix
Well, an easy fix /hopefully/ (not sure if simply adding the build-de
y=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * debian/rules:
+- disable gnome-vfs support since it's gone now.
+
+ -- Yves-Alexis Perez Tue, 15 Mar 2011 19:55:20 +0100
+
contacts (0.9-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release
diff -u contacts-0.9/debian/rules contacts-0.9/debian/rules
--- con
On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 21:37 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 15.03.2011 20:06, schrieb Yves-Alexis Perez:
> > Ok, so after a try, the easy fix is not what I imagined. gnome-vfs is
> > indeed gone, so I just disabled it (it's used for vcard import/exp
On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 21:37 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 15.03.2011 20:06, schrieb Yves-Alexis Perez:
> > Ok, so after a try, the easy fix is not what I imagined. gnome-vfs is
> > indeed gone, so I just disabled it (it's used for vcard import/exp
oses: #614086
+- 03_eds-api-usage-fix added, stolen from Ubuntu, port to new EDS api.
+ * debian/rules:
+- includes autoreconf rule to regenerate Makefiles.
+ * debian/control:
+- add build-dep on dh-autoreconf.
+-
+
+ -- Yves-Alexis Perez Wed, 16 Mar 2011 22:04:55 +0100
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 18:26 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> Hey RT,
>
> now that all the Xfce 4.8 bits have been accepted to experimental, we'd
> like to upload to unstable. As it's a new major upstream release,
> there's quite some dependencies involved, so I gue
Package: release.debian.org
Owner: pkg-xfce-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
On mer., 2011-03-23 at 15:51 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 18:26 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > Hey RT,
> >
&
On jeu., 2011-03-31 at 14:30 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Xfce 4.8 (for the most part) doesn't rely on hal anymore, at least on Linux.
> Yves-Alexis, what is the fallback on kfreebsd? Does Xfce 4.8 on kfreebsd still
> require hal or will it just have reduced functionality?
>
On BSD it's reduced f
On mar., 2011-04-12 at 16:28 +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
>
> We would like to perform the transition from libnotify1 to libnotify4.
>
> This transition will requires sourcefull uploads as there is a
> (minimal) API change.
Note that some packages might already have some #ifdefs to manage it
On mer., 2011-04-13 at 15:03 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> Sorry for the late reply, and thanks for this detailed analysis. It's very
> helpful!
>
> On 0, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > 1. libnotify
> > Once gtk3 is here, we can upload libnotify 0.6. This version is
> > binary-comp
After trying --with-clutter as indicated on irc, it doesn't work either.
It FTBFS because it tries to use a function only present in clutter-gtk
1.0 (which is GTK+ 3). I've opened a GNOME bug
(https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=647832) but in the meantime
I'm not too sure what to do.
One s
On ven., 2011-04-15 at 08:15 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> I fully concur. Anyway this plugin doesn’t work for 3.0 either, for
> the moment.
Ok, it might make sense to disable it completely with
--disable-contacts-map (or whatever the option is called).
Josselin, could you take care of the upl
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Hey,
the ktsuss package shipped in Squeeze contains some vulnerabilities,
which have made the package removed from Testing/Unstable (since it was
unmaintained at that time). The upstream git re
On sam., 2011-07-30 at 23:18 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> tag 622363 pending
> kthxbye
>
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 16:28:00 +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
>
> > We would like to perform the transition from libnotify1 to libnotify4.
> >
> Let's go ahead with this.
>
As added on #630268, evo
On lun., 2011-08-01 at 19:35 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> As added on #630268, evolution 3.0 works with libnotify 0.7 but it needs
> libgdata from experimental, not sure if it's supposed to happen soon (I
> didn't really touch 3.x branch at all). I can try to build evolu
On lun., 2011-08-01 at 22:48 +0100, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 22:11 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > So it doesn't look really good, I guess those were fixed somehow in
> 3.0
> > branch, but as 2.32 is starting to be a bit old, I'm not really sure
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Hey,
looking at the libnotify transition, I can see that I'm involved in
quite some packages, but as there are a lot of packages in total, it can
be easy to miss one. I thought it could be nice to have a dd-list (or
similar) of the relevant packaqes,
On mer., 2011-10-19 at 15:28 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> What I'm wondering is if we tried to ask upstream whether they would be
> willing to extend the DLJ offer so we can keep security fixes for the
> sun-java6 version in stable coming in for the lifetime of this release,
> notwithstanding th
On ven., 2011-10-21 at 22:17 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> At the very least the new webkit will need to declare Breaks on midori
> (<< 0.4.1-2) or something like that. And midori needs to get fixed up,
> by the sound of it.
midori has a guard for this, see
https://bugs.launchpad.net/midori/+b
On ven., 2011-10-21 at 22:38 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> That code should be killed, not
> #if !WEBKIT_CHECK_VERSION (1, 4, 3)
I've asked on upstream bug about that, but I'm not sure it's that
trivial nor really important. That code has been present and working in
multiple midori versions alre
1 - 100 of 227 matches
Mail list logo
