Bug#852770: unblock: lcms2/2.8-4

+ + * New patch: debian/patches/fix-CVE-2016-10165.patch. +Fix for CVE-2016-10165. (Closes: #852627) +Thanks to Salvatore Bonaccorso + + -- Thomas Weber Thu, 26 Jan 2017 11:04:13 +0100 + lcms2 (2.8-3) unstable; urgency=medium * New patch: lcms2-fix-strFrom16-byte-order.patch. diff -Nru

Re: [fran...@debian.org: Re: HDF5 migration to 1.8.4]

On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 09:25:00AM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > Just a gently polling. > > Most of the packages still need a rebuild, but maybe python transition has > major priority... > > - Forwarded message from "Francesco P. Lovergine" > - > > Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 13:28

binNMUs for hdf5

Hi, please schedule the following binNMUS: nmu dynare . alpha amd64 armel hppa i386 ia64 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc -m "Rebuild against hdf5" nmu octave-ad . alpha amd64 armel hppa i386 ia64 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 mips mipsel powerpc s390 sparc -m "Rebuild

Re: [fran...@debian.org: Re: HDF5 migration to 1.8.4]

On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 02:45:36PM -, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote, Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:30:41 +0100: >> On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 09:25:00AM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: >> > Just a gently polling. >> > >> > Most of the packages still need a rebuild, but maybe pytho

Re: binNMUs for hdf5

On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 01:39:32PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > Thomas Weber writes: > > please schedule the following binNMUS: > > Done. Thanks. Now, two more nmu octave-communications . ALL . -m "Rebuild against hdf5" dw octave-communications . A

Bug#573907: RM: octave3.0 -- ROM; outdated, superseded by octave3.2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal I want to get rid of octave3.0 for Squeeze. Please hint it out of testing. Thanks Thomas -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0.3 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-amd6

Bug#573907: RM: octave3.0 -- ROM; outdated, superseded by octave3.2

Hi, On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 06:24:40AM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sun, 2010-03-14 at 23:04 +0100, Thomas Weber wrote: > > I want to get rid of octave3.0 for Squeeze. Please hint it out of > > testing. > > You'll need to make sure nothing still depends on it in

Re: Linear Algebra Libraries

On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 06:00:04PM +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > Le samedi 20 mars 2010 à 13:49 +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt a écrit : > > Sylvestre Ledru writes: > > > I am planning to upload some modifications in the way Linear Algebra > > > Libraries BLAS / LAPACK and ATLAS are handle in Deb

binNMUs for octave-* packages

Hi, please schedule the following binNMUS: nmu octave-ad . ALL . -m "Rebuild with octave-pkg-dev 0.7.3" nmu octave-ann . ALL . -m "Rebuild with octave-pkg-dev 0.7.3" nmu octave-audio . ALL . -m "Rebuild with octave-pkg-dev 0.7.3" nmu octave-combinatorics . ALL . -m "Rebuild with octave-pkg-dev

Re: binNMUs for octave-* packages

On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:49:54PM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote: > Hi, > please schedule the following binNMUS: > > nmu octave-ad . ALL . -m "Rebuild with octave-pkg-dev 0.7.3" > nmu octave-ann . ALL . -m "Rebuild with octave-pkg-dev 0.7.3" > nmu octave-audi

Bug#581782: nmu: arpack_2.1+parpack96.dfsg-3

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hi, it seems arpack was built in an unclean chroot and now forces the installation of libatlas3gf-base on amd64; in contrast on i386: libblas3gf | libblas.so.3gf | libatlas3gf-base n

Bug#573907: RM: octave3.0 -- ROM; outdated, superseded by octave3.2

Hi, sorry, I'm swamped in other work, so I didn't act earlier on this. On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 02:32:23PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 06:24:40 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > On Sun, 2010-03-14 at 23:04 +0100, Thoma

Bug#593505: unblock: dynare/4.1.2-2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Please unblock package dynare, it contains only debconf translation updates. Changelog below: dynare (4.1.2-2) unstable; urgency=low * debian/po/da.po: new Danish debconf t

Approval of octave3.2 3.2.4-7

y are already pulled in by other packages, so we don't need to force specific versions of Mesa (closes: #591333). The patch is a two line change extracted from upstream's development tree. Thanks Thomas From: "Thomas Weber" Subject: Don't crash on calling add

unblock: octave-nan/1.0.9-2

Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Severity: normal Please unblock package octave-nan It contains only a small patch (see below). The bug is considered critical by upstream, see http://bugs.debian.org/594906 There are some other sm

Bug#595294: unblock: octave-nan/1.0.9-2

Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Severity: normal Please unblock package octave-nan It contains only a small patch (see below). The bug is considered critical by upstream, see http://bugs.debian.org/594906 There are some other sm

Bug#596265: unblock: octave3.2/3.2.4-7

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package octave3.2 Discussion happened at http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2010/08/msg01690.html Thanks Thomas unblock octave3.2/3.2.4-7 -- System Informatio

Re: HPPA and lenny

On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 04:27:38PM +0100, Christoph Martin wrote: > >> The kernel build succeded after 71 hours. > > [snip] > >> What do I have to do to establish and configure it as a buildd host? > >=20 > > How about being a little bit sensible? a C100 will *never* be suitable > > as a buildd hos

Question about fixing #512075

Hi, #512075 was fixed by upstream in a new release. The diff between those two releases is in the bug report, http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=30;filename=1.0.6-1.0.7.diff.bz2;att=1;bug=512075 There are only two actual changes in there, the biggest part of the diff is the newly

Re: Question about fixing #512075

On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 07:59:35PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Thomas Weber [Sat, 17 Jan 2009 16:27:59 +0100]: > > > Hi, > > > #512075 was fixed by upstream in a new release. The diff between those > > two releases is in the bug report, > > http://bugs.deb

Re: Question about fixing #512075

On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 10:18:19PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 01:22:19PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Thomas Weber [Sat, 24 Jan 2009 22:08:31 +0100]: > > > I've patched 1.0.6 instead, it turned out to be only a one-line change. > > Sadly

Re: Question about fixing #512075

Short status update: Aurelien gave me access to an ARM machine, so I can try to get this fixed. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Thanks for unblocking octave3.0

Hi, thanks for already unblocking octave3.0/1:3.0.1-6lenny2 Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: Question about fixing #512075

Am Montag, den 02.02.2009, 23:14 +0100 schrieb Thomas Weber: > Short status update: Aurelien gave me access to an ARM machine, so I can > try to get this fixed. Okay, I see Luk has already unblock octave-symbolic/1.0.6-3 Thanks Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: octave3.2 autobuild problems

On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 08:41:42AM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 09:49:34PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > > The octave3.2 package failed to autobuild on ia64 and is stuck on > > powerpc. > > the armel experimental buildd is again having hangings like #524745 > in octave

Re: octave3.2 autobuild problems

On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 09:46:59AM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 08:03:04AM +0200, Thomas Weber wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 08:41:42AM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > > > the armel experimental buildd is again having hangings like #524745 > > >

Re: [buildd-tools-devel] octave3.2 autobuild problems

On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 07:10:41PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 08:26:43PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 02:04:24PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:53:19PM +0200, Thomas Weber wrote: > > >

Re: first try at actions of suiteparse/openmpi transition (was: Re: SuiteSparse 3.2.0->3.4.0 transition)

On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 12:40:01PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, > > Rene Engelhard wrote: > > hint mono/2.4+dfsg-6 mod-mono/2.4.2-1 xsp/2.4.2-1 mono-tools/2.4.2-1 > > mono was now (force-)hinted in by Phil (needed also gtk-sharp2 ftr), so > can we force suitesparse/openmpi in, please? Coul

Advice for bug fix

Hi, with the fix for #410070 in octave2.9-2.9.9-8, an FTBFS error in octave2.9-forge was found (#410463). This turned out to be an error in the way the unit tests for octave2.9-forge are created at build time. Unfortunately, in fixing this bug in octave2.9-forge, we hit another bug in Octave2.9

Re: Advice for bug fix

Am Mittwoch, den 21.02.2007, 16:19 -0800 schrieb Steve Langasek: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 06:52:02PM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote: > > with the fix for #410070 in octave2.9-2.9.9-8, an FTBFS error in > > octave2.9-forge was found (#410463). This turned out to be an error in >

Please unblock octave2.9-2.9.9-8etch1 and octave2.9-forge-2006.07.09+dfsg1-8 [was: Re: Advice for bug fix]

libglpk0 to << 4.15, to avoid problems with the new glpk 4.15 package now in experimental. -- Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:47:51 +0100 octave2.9-forge (2006.07.09+dfsg1-8) unstable; urgency=low [ Thomas Weber ] * debian/control: Bump Octave2.9&

Re: Please unblock octave2.9-2.9.9-8etch1 and octave2.9-forge-2006.07.09+dfsg1-8

Am Dienstag, den 27.02.2007, 19:52 +0100 schrieb Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt: > Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > please > > unblock octave2.9/2.9.9-8etch1 > > unblock octave2.9-forge/2006.07.09+dfsg1-8 > > > > Now with working uni

Please give octaviz back on arm

Hi, octaviz failed in April with an ICE on arm. Can you give it back such that it is tried again? octaviz_0.4.5-5 Thanks Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: please rebuild octave2.9 on sparc

Am Samstag, den 30.06.2007, 15:49 -0700 schrieb Steve Langasek: > On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 05:51:32PM -0400, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote: > > > Looking at > > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=octave2.9&ver=1%3A2.9.12-1&arch=sparc&stamp=1180158407&file=log > > > it seems that octave2.9 1:2.

binNMU for Octave 2.9.13

Hi, octave2.9 was built in an outdated chroot for i386, resulting in a broken libcurl dependency. Is a binNMU sufficient to fix this? octave2.9_1:2.9.13-1, Rebuild against current libcurl on i386, 1, i386 Thanks Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "

Re: binNMUs for gfortran transition

On 10/03/08 21:41 +0200, Riku Voipio wrote: > One more (missed due to being in contrib) > > octave-gpc_0.1.6-4, Transition to gfortran libs, 1, alpha arm i386 ia64 m68k > mips powerpc s390 NACK by maintainers, we'll do a sourceful upload. Riku, thanks for catching this. Thomas -- To

Give back octplot on powerpc and ia64

Hi, octplot's latest build failed on powerpc ia64 due to a change in libfltk1.1. This has since been fixed in fltk1.1 (1.1.8~rc2-2). Can you give ocplot back on powerpc and ia64? Thanks Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubsc

Re: Suitesparse transition

On 19/03/08 13:11 +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The suitesparse transition is involving a quite large number of packages. I > > prepared an igloo URL [1] with the ones I think are involved. Please, > > correct me if I am wrong. The mips

Re: broken buildd (was: Suitesparse transition)

On 20/03/08 09:19 +0100, Torsten Werner wrote: > Hi, > > please see > : > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 29 May 23 2007 /etc/alternatives/octave-config > -> /usr/bin/octave-config-2.1.71 > > That is

Give-backs for octaviz

Hi, please give back octaviz on the following architectures: unconditionally: alpha i386 mips mipsel powerpc sparc with dep-wait on octave3.0 (1:3.0.0-10): s390 hppa In case it matters: these were binNMUs for the hdf-transition. Thanks Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai

Give back of packages on mips

Hi, the build chroot on mips buildd ball seems broken[1]. So, please give back the following packages on mips in the hope that they are tried on a different buildd: octave-gsl octave-octgpr octave-linear-algebra octave-image qtoctave shogun If you

Give back qtoctave on alpha

Hi, please give back qtoctave on alpha, with a dep-wait on cmake (>=2.6) gb qtoctave . alpha Thanks Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

freeze exception for octave3.0

Hi, would fixing #494139 (quoted below) qualify for a freeze exception? Am Donnerstag, den 07.08.2008, 14:57 +0200 schrieb Alexander Achenbach: > Package: octave3.0-headers > Version: 1:3.0.1-6 > Tags: lenny > > This package should allow package libhdf5-openmpi-dev to satisfy > the HDF5 MPI dev

Re: freeze exception for octave3.0

On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 07:52:15PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > Thomas Weber wrote: >> Hi, >> >> would fixing #494139 (quoted below) qualify for a freeze exception? > > Yes Do you prefer an upload to unstable or testing-proposed-updates? Octave has lot's of bui

Re: freeze exception for octave3.0

[resending, it seems http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=494139#20 didn't make it to the list] Am Donnerstag, den 07.08.2008, 19:52 +0200 schrieb Luk Claes: > Thomas Weber wrote: > > Hi, > > > > would fixing #494139 (quoted below) qualify for a freeze e

Re: freeze exception for octave3.0

Am Montag, den 11.08.2008, 21:28 +0100 schrieb Adeodato Simó: > * Thomas Weber [Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:34:43 +0200]: > > > [resending, it seems > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=494139#20 > > didn't make it to the list] > > (It did arrive.) H

Re: [Pkg-scicomp-devel] including atlas in lenny

Am Dienstag, den 12.08.2008, 11:10 -0300 schrieb Steve Langasek: > On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 11:13:33AM +0200, Ondrej Certik wrote: > > > the atlas package was uploaded: > > > http://packages.qa.debian.org/a/atlas.html > > > which fixes this RC (ftbfs) bug: > > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu

Re: freeze exception for octave3.0

On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 09:28:40PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Thomas Weber [Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:34:43 +0200]: > Given that octave3.0 has the same version in testing and unstable, why > would you want to upload to t-p-u and not unstable? (that is, you should > upload to unstabl

Freeze exception for octave-ga

Hi, octave-ga's upstream notified us that the current version in Lenny is in a bad shape and whether we could update it to current SVN, see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=495489 Now, before you tar and feather me: upstream uses Lenny himself and has tested this version on Lenn

Re: [Pkg-octave-devel] Freeze exception for octave-ga

Am Montag, den 18.08.2008, 11:14 +0200 schrieb Thomas Weber: > Hi, > > octave-ga's upstream notified us that the current version in Lenny is in > a bad shape and whether we could update it to current SVN, see > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=495489 &

Re: Freeze exception for octave-ga

Am Sonntag, den 24.08.2008, 18:58 +0200 schrieb Luk Claes: > Thomas Weber wrote: > > Hi, > > > > octave-ga's upstream notified us that the current version in Lenny is in > > a bad shape and whether we could update it to current SVN, see > > > > http

Please unblock octaviz 0.4.7-2

3.8.0 (no changes needed) * added myself to the uploaders list. [ Thomas Weber ] * New patch: patches/no-nan-values Error out in case of NaN values, they are not supported by VTK (closes: 480431) I didn't remove the standards bum

Please unblock octave-vrml

(no changes needed) [ Thomas Weber ] * New patch: whitedune_for_freewrl: use whitedune instead of freewrl, the later is not packaged in Debian (closes: 499918) * debian/control: Add necessary dependencies for whitedune and dependencies used in the demos. -- Thomas Weber <[EM

Re: Please unblock octave-vrml

On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 05:15:05PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Thomas Weber [Wed, 01 Oct 2008 08:55:40 +0200]: > > please unbock octave-vrml, currently in unstable. Changelog and Patch > > quoted/attached. > > Unblocked by Luk. Thanks Thomas -- To UNSUBSC

Does fixing 496964 qualifies for an exception?

Hi, http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=496964 The bug renders sound.m unusable, meaning a user can't use this to play sound (the bug stems from a change to get it working on Mac). Attached is the proposed patch (yes, only one line removed). Thomas Don't set the play com

Re: Does fixing 496964 qualifies for an exception?

Am Montag, den 13.10.2008, 09:34 +0200 schrieb Adeodato Simó: > Ah, and please mail again when it's uploaded. Built on all architectures, unblock octave-audio/1.1.1-2 Thanks Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac

Bug#682572: unblock: octave-java/1.2.8-6

The fix for #681355 should fix the bug with the test suite as well. +(Closes: #664776) + + -- Thomas Weber Sun, 22 Jul 2012 23:19:39 +0200 + octave-java (1.2.8-5) unstable; urgency=low * restore-locale.patch: new patch, restores locale after initializing the JVM diff -Nru octave-java-

Freeze exception for Octave

Hi, in order to fix #598227 (http://bugs.debian.org/598227), I would like to upload octave with the attached patch (it adds /usr/include/mpi to the include path used by mkoctfile, the script used for generating 'addons' for Octave). It shouldn't have any influence on other packages. Post-Squeeze

hdf5 transition

Hi > Steve, you probably should create a little "transitions FAQ" entry > in the developers reference to not always have to answer to the same > wrong proposals of developers who only do a transition once every couple > of years :) I fail to see what's so wrong about an (automated) email stating

Re: Status of Debian Sarge R2

Hi, is it possible that the references were mixed up in the previous mail? I think [1] and [3] should be switched. > All packages which we currently consider for R2 are listed at [1]. > sudo: proposed fix exists at [2], > See [3] for a list of packages still missing in s-p-u but availible > vi

Getting octaviz into testing

Hi, the latest version of octaviz can't enter testing because it ftbfs on arm, ia64 and sparc. The failure is due to a chroot corruption on the buildds, probably caused by an earlier upload of a related package last year, see [1]. Summary: There's a broken alternatives symlink set in the chroot

Bug#742263: squeeze-pu: package lcms2/2.2+git20110628-2.2+deb7u1

628/debian/changelog 2014-03-17 23:41:12.0 +0100 +++ lcms2-2.2+git20110628/debian/changelog 2014-03-21 11:29:26.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +lcms2 (2.2+git20110628-2.2+deb7u1) stable; urgency=medium + + * Fix security bugs in stable (Closes: #714529), CVE-2013-4160 + + -- Thomas

Bug#742263: squeeze-pu: package lcms2/2.2+git20110628-2.2+deb7u1

On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 04:24:24PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 = wheezy confirmed > Control: retitle -1 wheezy-pu: package lcms2/2.2+git20110628-2.2+deb7u1 > > On 2014-03-21 12:21, Thomas Weber wrote: > >Package: release.debian.org > >Severity: normal