Hi, is it possible that the references were mixed up in the previous mail? I think [1] and [3] should be switched.
> All packages which we currently consider for R2 are listed at [1]. > sudo: proposed fix exists at [2], > See [3] for a list of packages still missing in s-p-u but availible > via security.d.o. References: [1] http://release.debian.org/stable/missing-security.html [2] http://klecker.debian.org/~joey/security/sudo/ [3] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianReleases/PointReleases That said, if a package is in s-p-u, but not in the wiki page [3], does that mean it will not be part of R2? (The package I have in mind is 'octaviz'). Regards Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
