.13/debian/changelog 2021-02-08 21:35:48.0 +0100
+++ squid-4.13/debian/changelog 2021-03-10 09:19:32.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,18 @@
+squid (4.13-7) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Add full postrm scripts while we don't solve #984897 on debhelper.
+Closes: #984880.
+
+ -- Sant
Hi!
Just to clarify a bit, as the changes on the sources may seem big, these are
the differences on resulting scripts (the only that was changed besides
changelogs and a note on NEWS).
>From -5 to -6:
diff -ru 5/control/postrm 6/control/postrm
--- 5/control/postrm2021-02-08 21:35:48.
Hi!
While we were waiting for 4.13-7 to age and enter testing, we were filled a
security bug for CVE-2020-25097.
I decided to fix that security problem ASAP and that is what is on 4.13-8,
just that. 4.13-8 just adds the patch to fix the CVE as available at:
http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v4/
> > Fixing a couple of nasty bugs discovered late,
> Yes, due to handling of a new binary package that you had migrated into
> bullseye the day before that wasn't allowed anymore exactly to avoid
> this class of bugs.
Agreed, this was something that several users had asked for and that we, the
scr
Hi again!
I have just pushed:
https://salsa.debian.org/squid-team/squid/-/commit/fe8a10ef8ec40411bb59bec7af2b179796d4f4ef
I think I'm addressing all your concerns there, if you like it I'll run
tests tomorrow and upload the -9 package.
Thanks in advance.
--
Manty/BestiaTester -> http://manty.n
I'm Ccing my fellows at the squid team in case they want to add something
here, for the full conversation, please see #985390.
I have finished testing the changes for -9, I don't know if I like it more
now or if it would be better to just leave the comment on the NEWS file and
don't echo anything
rm script that the debhelper code was put manually.
+ * Add README.Debian to squid-openssl.
+
+ -- Santiago Garcia Mantinan Tue, 23 Mar 2021 00:18:11
+0100
+
squid (4.13-8) unstable; urgency=medium
* Add SQUID-2020_11.patch to fix HTTP Request Smuggling.
diff -Nru squid-4.13/debian/NEWS squi
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package squid3
When we upgrade from Jessie's squid3 to Stretch we are switching from binary
package named squid3 to the one named squid. We are preserving the config
file whi
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: stretch
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
When updating a production machine to Stretch I found that the check for
vlan interfaces was wrong and thus some of the vlans were not being created.
I have worked on a fix for thi
log2017-06-27 22:57:15.0
+0200
+++ bridge-utils-1.5-13+deb9u1/debian/changelog 2017-06-27 22:57:37.0
+0200
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+bridge-utils (1.5-13+deb9u1) stretch; urgency=low
+
+ * Fix a problem with some vlan interfaces not being created.
+
+ -- Santiago Garcia Mantinan
g
--- bridge-utils-1.5-13/debian/changelog2017-07-02 23:27:55.0
+0200
+++ bridge-utils-1.5-13+deb9u1/debian/changelog 2017-07-02 23:29:30.0
+0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+bridge-utils (1.5-13+deb9u1) stretch; urgency=low
+
+ * Fix a problem with some vlan interfaces not being create
Hi!
We've already missed 9.1 with this fix, I left some questions here last
time...
> Will this be ok for an upload?
>
> If so... when should I upload it?
>
> Will a normal dput work given the stretch target on the changelog, or should
> I do something special?
Can we try to make this into 9.2
er
of gnash which is the other free alternative to swfdec.
Regards.
- Forwarded message from Santiago Garcia Mantinan -
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2010 01:10:26 +0100
From: Santiago Garcia Mantinan
To: pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Cc: little_m...@yahoo.es
Subject: what to do
Hi!
I was looking at the status of the swfdec stuff (swfdec0.5, swfdec-mozilla,
swfdec-gnome) before uploading the new version, and It seems [1] that we are
just missing the builds for swfdec-mozilla on mips and mipsel so that we can
transition.
If somebody could please trigger those builds which
swfdec0.6 has been on unstable for a long time, but it never got compiled on
arm, we have a security issue on swfdec versions before 0.6.4 and have the
version 0.5 on testing with version 0.6.4 waiting for arm to enter testing.
For version 0.6.4 to enter testing we need also swfdec-mozilla and
swf
Please remove swfdec0.5 from the archives, currently on testing, unstable
and experimental, it has been superseded by swfdec0.6, 0.5 version has
security problems and is no longer maintained as it was the old development
branch. All packages depending on version 0.5 have been compiled against 0.6
a
Hi!
On tuesday after the freeze a bugfix version of swfdec0.6 was released, I
uploaded it to unstable (priority=high, sorry about that, I hadn't read the
freeze announcement).
The new version is just a bugfix version and fixes several crashes, playing
content which could be remote content, thus I
Hi!
Due to serious severity bug #493307 (swfdec-mozilla: can't use another Flash
plugin in mozilla when installed) and the fact that iceweasel and most if
not all browsers don't implement a good way to select the plugin to be used
to play a content, the maintainers of flash plugins for mozilla hav
The 27th I uploaded a new version of bridge-utils to close two bugs, one was
just a doc bug, so I just changed one of the manpages, the other bug was a
normal severity bug, so this package wouln't be a candidate for an
exception, but the bug (496491) was causing that all the "set" commands of
brctl
Hi!
Sorry to jump on the discussion so late, I only realised about the discusion
today when Kel pointed me to it after I had filled more info on bug #492251
because of the bad state current package is on.
I see two issues here:
- Maintainability of the packages we "ship" with (even this is not m
Hi!
After talking with upstream about #496741 and #503315 (one of them is a RC
bug) it has said that this seems to be upstream's bug
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15962
which was solved with this patch:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/swfdec/swfdec-mozilla/diff/src/swfmoz_player.c?h=0.8&
> Ok, please upload do t-p-u.
Ok, uploaded right now.
Regards...
--
Manty/BestiaTester -> http://manty.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Now for the real request. It would be nice if the release notes (html, pdf
> and txt versions) could be included on the first CD, same as the
> installation manual. There are 11 languages that qualify:
>en, es, fr, de, cs, it, nl, pt_BR, ja, zh_CN, zh_TW
As for the manuals, we are currentl
> Correct me if I'm wrong but these are based on the manuals provided by the
> latest debian-installer-manual package and not on the latest SVN sources.
> Am I right? Just curious, since there have been updates and improvements to
> the english version of the manual, new translations have been made
Hi!
I was trying to see why if we had more than 100 Megs free on our first
PowerPC DVD we had a third DVD with just 42 Megs, the answer is that
debian-cd tried to put vegastrike-data at the end if the first dvd and it
didn't fit there, so it stopped trying to fill DVD 1. This is an issue with
debi
; urgency=medium
+
+ * Add a couple of upstream picked patches to fix some issues on 5.7
+that upstream has fixed on 5.8.
+
+ -- Santiago Garcia Mantinan Fri, 28 Apr 2023 08:35:27
+0200
+
squid (5.7-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* Urgency high due to security fixes
diff -Nru
squid-5.7/debian
26 matches
Mail list logo
