two hours and after britney.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
hile since I touched any of this
> stuff ...)
Yeah, given that the version graph disagrees with found/fixed I guess you
should talk with Don. ;-)
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
" calls)?
Unlikely, unless it's blocked somewhere and unkillable anyway, I think. It
doesn't install any signal handlers for TERM, so it should go down immediately.
The wrapper is tiny and just forks off CGI processes based on FastCGI requests.
It's only 661 lines
bout this patch was already said in the GNOME bugzilla,
so no point repeating it here.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:34:55PM +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> I'd like to get your permission to upload to stable a fix for bug
> #615060, which has been addressed by a patch provided by upstream, and
> confirmed to work by bug submitter.
Wow. ACK.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:18:42PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:34:55PM +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> > I'd like to get your permission to upload to stable a fix for bug
> > #615060, which has been addressed by a patch provided by upstream, and
>
age -S is still supposed to list
> the names of generated binaries in the .dsc file.
preparing a debian/control file with scripts pre dpkg-buildpackage
producing a source package is fine. Modifying it during a binary build
isn't.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp K
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 12:53:56PM +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> Il 15/04/2011 20:06, Luca Falavigna ha scritto:
> > Il 14/04/2011 23:29, Philipp Kern ha scritto:
> >> After staring at the code a little longer: what keybinder returns from that
> >> function is a
vote.
Anyway: Feel free to upload the package with the correct version and suite in
the changelog without new translations (updates to existing ones are fine) and
thus without autofoo. The two real changes you listed are ok.
As Adam said: next time a gentle ping is appreciated.
Kind regards,
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 05:36:39PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> I'd like to upload kerneltop 0.8-2+squeeze1 to stable, in order to
> fix bug #607309. Debdiff attached.
Your gentle ping has been received. Please proceed with the upload to the
queue near you.
Cheers
Philipp Kern
--
.&#
han
being the best since sliced bread pre-release then, if that's the
consequence. (I.e. we shouldn't have released with it, if you're
that hostile.)
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubsc
ver
into testing if it's newer.)
Your list seems sane, however I'd prefer to see a debdiff first. :)
Thanks
Philipp Kern
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive
ply that would be quite helpful.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de Stable Release Manager
`. `' xmpp:p...@0x539.de Wanna-Build Admin
version in
stable appreciated) and the NAT-T stuff could be done with a very good reason.
("Don't do it, it's insecure" vs. "hey, it's now common to do insecure stuff,
so let's allow it" isn't exactly that convincing, yet.)
Kind regards,
Philipp
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:11:58PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Attached is a debdiff of the build in a squeeze chroot; packages
> available at http://www.codelibre.net/~rleigh/schroot-squeeze/
Is this fixed in unstable already? It needs to be.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''
Hi,
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 10:49:51PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> 09.05.2011 22:10, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 12:44:54PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> >> I forgot to show a debdiff for the request.
> > Please debdiff the source, not the result
m connection to a
> strongswan IPsec gateway. And yes, most commercial IPsec gateways (e.g.
> included in Linux-based firewalls) enable this right now.
I guess I'd prefer to have the other stuff sorted out first and have a
look at this later. It's strictly new functionality and albeit I
sympathise with it, this might need more intense consideration.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
(It's a bit sad that there aren't separate number ranges for stable
updates and security updates, though.)
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 07:49:07AM +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
> I'd like to propose the following change for gwrite (as attached
> debdiff).
Sorry, but no. All this is out of scope for stable. (Also: unless
there's a RC bug because of them lintian errors do not qualify.)
Kind rega
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 08:56:15PM +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
> On 2011年05月31日 18:16, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 07:49:07AM +0800, Aron Xu wrote:
> >> I'd like to propose the following change for gwrite (as attached
> >> debdiff).
> > Sorry,
t from the overlay instead, which is what would happen if we
don't allow it. But a proper review needs to take place anyway.)
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
that you would allow?
[3] and [4] look fine, I'd like to see the whole diff against Squeeze, though.
Is it reviewable? (Added test cases also seem like a great idea, FWIW.)
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : h
Hi,
the second Squeeze point release (6.0.2) is now scheduled for
Saturday, June 25th.
Stable NEW will be frozen during the weekend of the 18/19th.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
Stable Release Manager
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
;s
still unfixed in stable. Lucas, could you prepare a p-u upload, please?
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ds to be fixed in unstable first.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de Stable Release Manager
`. `' xmpp:p...@0x539.de Wanna-Build Admin
`-fin
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 10:06:03PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> Let me know whether I can proceed.
Yeah. I cannot guarantee that we don't accept something new afterwards but
I'll check it once it hits p-u.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp Kern
d it's only possible to reactivate that enctype by patching the KDC?
I would've assumed that it's just a configuration matter on the KDC
side. (Like it's the case with MIT Kerberos where you have to adjust
"supported_enctypes".)
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
fair for NFS/AFS,
even though we got recent support for better crypto in the kernel.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de Stable Release Manager
`. `' xmpp:p...@0x539.de
e lose ends for the point release
currently and this was one of them, which was lingering around because we
generally don't like touching core stuff with extensive changes.
Kind regards and thanks for your efforts,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Deve
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 01:10:18AM -0400, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 12:36:01AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > We cannot use the unstable version verbatim for technical reasons. So I'd
> > like
> > to ask you to add a changelog entry with &quo
(hint)
It should help with the easy cases like shorewall. I don't know how well it
works with others. And the switch will be to b2's compatible mode first,
with b1 running in parallel and diffed afterwards.
I'm mainly stating this for completeness and awareness. Not as an
ges on !kfreebsd
architectures). If you apply a second pair of eyes within the porters
that would be appreciated, however.
If you need to touch packages that are also available on Linux we need
to ahere to the normal review procedure and criteria.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
; > In this case I am guessing I would have increase the version number?
> I just realized I never got a response to my email. Can you please
> respond and I can prepare a new upload?
I'll mark the package for REJECT at the next dinstall run. You'll most likely
get a ma
uot; machines.
I propose the attached debdiff as an update to stable. The patch applies
properly during the build and the regression test suite runs successfully.
(Of course the test case shipped with the patch got reverted, though.)
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
diff -u postgresql-8.4-8.4.8/debian/ch
is. Let's see
how they work out. At least scim-uim hasn't been rebuilt for ages.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110629163444.ga18...@thrall.0x539.de
m ok with you going ahead with this transition. Please
ping me when it's uploaded, though, so that I can take care of the binNMUs.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/poppler-python/+bug/696025
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
plugin
> gourmet
> pdfshuffler
> and apparently none of them uses the get_text() function of a
> PopplerPage, so there is nothing that would get broken by this new
> poppler-python patch.
\o/ Then let's do it.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Phil
xed
when everything else is ready we will temporarily remove gdcm, necessitating
the removal of ants, insighttoolkit and mriconvert. They will be free to
re-enter testing once the issues are resolved.
So poppler can go ahead.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-rele
> tracker (poppler-glib)
> > > tumbler (poppler-glib)
> > > xournal (poppler-glib)
> > > webkit2pdf (poppler-glib)
> > > zathura (poppler-glib)
> > [...]
> > I'm planning on uploading poppler to 0.6.17-2 later today.
&g
On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 01:07:01PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Not yet done for epdfview and libreoffice. Done for the others.
Now done for epdfview and libreoffice, too.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Pino,
am Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 06:21:51PM +0200 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
> Alle lunedì 4 luglio 2011, Philipp Kern ha scritto:
> > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 01:07:01PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > > Not yet done for epdfview and libreoffice. Done for the others.
> &g
> like i saw a ".package" condition in the python2.7 tracker page. If it
> isn't the case, sorry for the mistake, and then just add the libpoppler-
> qt4-dev b-d to the affected conditions.
Added, let's wait for the next update.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.'
rds,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de Stable Release Manager
`. `' xmpp:p...@0x539.de Wanna-Build Admin
`-finger pkern/k...@db.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Michael Gilbert
xpdf
Philipp Kern
pdf2svg
Georges Khaznadar
auto-multiple-choice
Frank Küster
texlive-bin (U)
Frank Küster
luatex (U)
Roger Leigh
cups (U)
Jeff Licquia
cups (U)
Ana Beatriz Guerrero Lopez
koffice (U)
Mathieu Malaterre
gdcm (U)
Loic Minier
here an expected transition end time?
> > > - can you please send out an email when it is done
> > What's the bug number?
> #633011
Why isn't it RC?
But if it's indeed introduced with the latest binNMU for the poppler transition
I'd rather like to see a sour
e offer a large
> number
> of alternatives, Clustal W is the reference in its field.
Would it make sense to "just" offer a backport of the current version
through backports.d.o instead?
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:20:18AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:14:16AM +0200, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> > > > Is there a approximate time scale for that, as we are having
> > > > a serious bug that makes tex segfault *every*time*, so we would
&g
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 12:32:26PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 03:03:20PM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> > On Di, 19 Jul 2011, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > > > I'd rather like to see a sourceful upload with only that fix,
> > > > urge
latter is a hammer.
Added an easy hint, thanks.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
because you uploaded auto-multiple-choice despite my mail telling you
not to, I temporarily removed auto-multiple-choice from testing for
the poppler transition. It can freely migrate back when it
eventually gets installable build-dependencies and ready to do so.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
ike we want it to.
4. Profit and get rid of d-i releases and just handle d-i like any
other package.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
h kfreebsd as
regressions there only affect this `technology preview'.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Julien,
am Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 08:19:42PM +0200 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
> This has been sitting in git for a while now (I'd actually forgotten
> about this), but we may want to fix it anyway.
please go ahead.
Thanks
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
to connect
> successfully from an nfs-utils 1.2.4 client without having to set
> permitted_enctypes on the server.
Why is the nfs-utils patch needed again? To be able to run nfs-utils
in squeeze with a newer kernel?
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
h problems. For each package, we specify the list of bugs that
> annoy us (Debian) somehow (transition, big breakage, orphaned and
> buggy, etc...).
Could we use that with a list of leaf packages that are RC buggy to
automate their removal? Is there an easy way to check if a package
installable in unstable.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
hrough the
"relaxing testing to an installable state" step within two hours. (No
threading in clisp activated, plain SAT-Britney compiled on Debian
unstable.)
So I guess there's still some debugging needed? Or is that a
fundamental flaw of the used heuristics?
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
akes squeeze kerberized NFS servers unusable with newer clients (e.g.,
> wheezy).
Please go ahead. I really hope that the regression potential is low
for existing clients. Let's hope we find it out before the point
release. (The change in nfs-utils is streching the guidelines a bit.)
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 06:43:38PM +0200, Paul Wise wrote:
> > Is there an easy way to check if a package is a leaf package?
> dak rm -Rn -s testing?
Yeah, d'uh. But that's an insane way to do it automatically.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp Kern
e/win32-loader.txt
That would be `pool/main', not `main/pool' in the URLs?
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de Stable Release Manager
`. `' xmpp:p...@0x539.de Wanna-Build Admin
`-finger pkern/k...@db.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
0 ossim/1.7.21-3/sparc
So it's the openscenegraph tansition one time with libcitygml and one
time with flightgear?
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
en that
we occassionally encounter FTBFS bugs with ruby, it would help a lot if you
could transition to symbol files instead (or any other way that doesn't
cause the upstream version to appear unnecessarily).
Kind regards and thanks,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp Kern
eeBSD&ZFS instance, i.e. servers?)
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
[1] http://dlc.sun.com/osol/docs/content/ZFSADMIN/gaynd.html#gamnd
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de Stable
for a --with{,out}-libffi flag, so that you can make
> sure the package is built without libffi support, even if libffi
> packages are installed in the build environment?
also this seems to be a case for a (even maybe temporary) build-conflicts.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`.
britney. It should be configurable to allow (libs
oldlibs) in, though. Would that be possible?
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de Stable Release Manager
`. `' xmpp:p...@0x5
in section libs or oldlibs[1]. A
naive thought would be "if this package would be in testing => binaries foo and
bar, that are no longer built in unstable, cannot be in testing too".
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
[1] I wonder though how much we anticipate SONAME changes in oldlibs. It
g.
I can tell you that it's still valid, at least. ;-)
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
that breaks down the transition into multiple small bits. I’m happy
> about that :-)
On --migrate I got several duplicates in the rationale why some
package cannot migrate. Is that just presentation or are some clauses
actually duplicated?
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Descr
ies in testing?
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de Stable Release Manager
`. `' xmpp:p...@0x539.de Wanna-Build Admin
`-finger pkern/k...@db.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ses where you load two different incompatible
libs into the same address space. OTOH we'd see quite a bunch of such
crashes in unstable, no?)
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de
ner (nomeata) ran his awesome SAT-Britney, which
> suggests following hint:
Last I looked it was coupled with ruby1.9.1 through ruby-gnome2. (Which
SAT-Britney cannot detect because it assumes that you can keep old libraries in
testing.)
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
--
.&#x
d-depend on libmtp-dev and is arch:all, so that
needs a sourceful upload.
I guess we could do this when libnotify's done.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
[1] http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libmtp.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 10:53:47AM +0200, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 11:24 PM, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > I guess we could do this when libnotify's done.
> OK, thank you!
Please start. (And please followup after your upload of libmtp got
accepted, so that we
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:04:02AM +0200, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > Please start. (And please followup after your upload of libmtp got
> > accepted, so that we can schedule the binNMUs.)
> Accepted in unstable, thanks!
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:40:51PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:04:02AM +0200, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > > Please start. (And please followup after your upload of libmtp got
> > &g
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 10:05:06AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> gnomad2 is unable to build on kfreebsd-* because of libgudev-1.0-dev missing
> on
> that architecture. I'd suggest requesting a binary removal from unstable for
> those two architectures by filing a bug against ftp
, before that).
That seems pretty complex to check with our existing tools. But to get an
overview, can you please tell us the relevant development packages people are
build-depending on? And a list of affected packages to check the result.
Kind regards and thanks
Philipp Kern
--
d one has no reverse
> dependencies.
I don't see a problem with removing tulip and deps from testing.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de Stable Release Manager
`. `
llect the current state? You only need to consider packages that
are currently in testing from our PoV, maybe that reduces your list of buggy
packages.
Kind regards and thanks,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de
usb.ids file so that newer
> hardware is recognized.
>
> You will find the fill debdiff below. Would it be possible to upload
> such a package to squeeze?
Yep, please go ahead.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
was used as a template. I've
> CCed the press team in case there's anything SRM can do to help,
> e.g. generate the mail version directly.
anything we can do?
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
; upload to stable as soon as time permits.
I guess this fell through the cracks?
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
27;t be an issue any more, as it got updated via t-p-u.
> However:
> Depends: rrdtool/amd64 ruby1.9.1 (not considered)
I forced ruby1.9.1 in, and hence this transition is done.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
w
> > totally different, but since we're going to wait on that for a bit for
> > transitions, I'll upload the fix to unstable first.
> That was a while ago now, and the fix has made it to testing. Please
> feel free to go ahead with the upload to stable.
Ping.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
> > the opt-in model.
> I'd say turn off compatible mode, and see if that ends up being an issue
> over the next few months.
I agree on that. It's something we can revert, as long as we keep the option
working.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp Kern
> people miss the occasion when something isn't normal.
This is still unfixed in sid, though.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
can the linux-modules-di-* packages be removed from unstable? They seem to be
built against 2.6.30 anyway and hence not useful. If so I can file the RM
bugs.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : htt
e anymore and we could safely accept it on
ftp-master.
You'll need a new DSA mail, though, that's the only "drawback".
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de
t; mismatch between arches and rakudo FTBS)'
Done.
> dw rakudo_0.1~2011.07-1 . i386 . -m '(>= parrot_3.6.0-1+b1)'
dw rakudo_0.1~2011.07-1 . i386 . -m 'libparrot-dev (>= 3.6.0-1+b1)'
Cheers
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
hy we would want to
> remove anything from the security archive or upload new things to the
> security archive?
You should get rid of any collisions that differ in hashes regardless if they
are on ftp-master or not, IMO. Furthermore you need another update to drop
Staat der Nederlan
Hi,
so apparently September is a very bad month to get CDs done. I'm hereby
proposing the following with the hope that we can do it that way:
* Lenny: October 1st
* Squeeze: October 8th
Can we do that, pretty please? :)
Any objections?
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 01:53:24PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 09:58, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > can the linux-modules-di-* packages be removed from unstable? They seem to
> > be
> > built against 2.6.30 anyway and hence not useful. If so I can
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 10:28:25AM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 09/04/2011 06:14 PM, Philipp Kern wrote:
> >so apparently September is a very bad month to get CDs done. I'm hereby
> >proposing the following with the hope that we can do it that way:
> >
Dear FTP masters,
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 06:14:50PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> so apparently September is a very bad month to get CDs done. I'm hereby
> proposing the following with the hope that we can do it that way:
>
> * Lenny: October 1st
> * Squeeze: October 8th
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 11:32:31AM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 09/05/2011 11:25 AM, Philipp Kern wrote:
> >That said, we saw that discussed on #d-live for the 6.0.1 point release and
> >you
> >basically said that point releases are a no brainer and started only on
the middle of week
39, October 1st at the latest.
base-files can be uploaded now, as it will be held in NEW until closing
time anyway.
Kind regards and thanks for your efforts
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 12:26:56PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 09/07/2011 09:30 PM, Philipp Kern wrote:
> >we finally got target dates for the next point releases of both Lenny
> >and Squeeze. Lenny should get 5.0.9 on October 1st; Squeeze will follow
> >on October 8t
s libgnustep-gui0.20
Ok, thanks, please go ahead.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer
: :' : http://philkern.de Stable Release Manager
`. `' xmpp:p...@0x539.de
st. We really do.
So fix "your" package in unstable, let it be tested, and we'll look at it. So
far all attempts have targetted stable only, which is the wrong approach.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
coming, but it sounds they could need a backport
instead.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
201 - 300 of 1035 matches
Mail list logo
