On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 12:53:56PM +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote: > Il 15/04/2011 20:06, Luca Falavigna ha scritto: > > Il 14/04/2011 23:29, Philipp Kern ha scritto: > >> After staring at the code a little longer: what keybinder returns from that > >> function is a guint32, so shouldn't it be TYPE_UINT? And why does it > >> overflow? I guess the reason it overflows comes from the X server (where > >> it's a CARD32 so uint32, too). It's not entirely clear to me why, though. > > After talking with Ulrik (upstream developer), he made me notice current > > upstream code has TYPE_UINT, so using it should be a better choice. He > > told me this bug could be caused by X server being active for a lot of > > time, making its timestamp bigger than the variable defined by Kupfer. > Attaching debdiff this time.
Yep, please go ahead. Kind regards Philipp Kern -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110430233049.GA3458@spike
