Hi Wouter,
On 27-02-2023 23:37, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
To be clear: this would require a pass through NEW, for the RDM tester
package ("ola-rdm-tester"). That's okay then? If so, can you add the
unblock? If not, I'll leave the rdm-tester for after the release.
No, adding new binaries is not OK
Hi Ana,
On 28-02-2023 21:57, Ana Guerrero Lopez wrote:
Please, keep debian-timeline out of bookworm, the installed HTML doesn't
show the timeline like it should so the package is useless.
The recommended way to achieve that is by filing an RC bug against the
package and let autoremoval take c
reassign 917528 releases.debian.org
retitle 917528 britney should add packages from debug archive too
user release.debian@package.debian.org
usertag 917528 britney
thanks
Hi,
On Fri, 28 Dec 2018 20:21:21 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote:
On 28-12-2018 10:16, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> In test
Hi,
Sorry for the delayed answer, also to Sam's original question.
On 25-02-2023 17:52, Guillem Jover wrote:
On Wed, 2023-01-25 at 09:47:59 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
Ah, was wondering the same few days before the toolchain freeze, as I
was unsure whether to update some of the packages I main
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-sg3-utils.html
Hi Jonathan,
On 02-03-2023 10:30, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
This is a prerequest, before uploading to unstable. The package has
already passed through NEW and is available in experi
Hi Yadd,
On 22-08-2022 22:01, Paul Gevers wrote:
On 22-08-2022 17:26, Yadd wrote:
could you remove node-request from testing ? Following #956423, it
shouldn't be part of next stable release. All its reverse dependencies
are already removed from testing (yarnpkg, node-matrix-sdk).
Control: tag -1 bullseye
On 06-11-2022 23:18, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
please remove python-matrix-nio from stable as it has an open security
bug (CVE-2022-39254) and no longer works as reported in [1] and I tested
myself.
Please also remove it's downstream dependencies, i.e. pantalaimon and
w
Hi Alberto,
On 24-01-2023 11:39, Alberto Garcia wrote:
On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 05:43:11PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
As soon as the new SONAME is known, an upload to experimental would
be appreciated to go through NEW. Please let us know once it's
available in experimental and the test bu
Hi,
On Thu, 14 Jan 2021 12:08:20 +0100 Hans-Christoph Steiner
wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: britney
android-platform-art as this in debian/tests/control:
https://salsa.debian.org/android-tools-team/android-platform-
Control: tags -1 moreinfo.
On 06-03-2023 11:07, Mathias Behrle wrote:
Please unblock the package tryton-server.
tryton-server isn't blocked now, and if nothing makes it a key package
between now and 18 days from now, it should just migrate on it's own.
tryton-server/6.0.29-1 fixes security
Dear DSA,
As is custom for the Release Team, I'm asking you what your plans are
with respect to testing upgrading DSA maintained machines to bookworm.
If my information is correct, in the past you'd first upgrade a non
critical machine to see if there's anything broken in bookworm that
prevents
Dear security team,
It's the time of the season to ask you to consider testing that the next
security suite is working as intended. In our checklist [1] it's
mentioned to coordinate with you an upload to bookworm-security to
confirm the build happens as expected. The checklist goes on to sugge
tags 1032614 moreinfo
user release.debian.org
usertag 1032614 unblock
affects 1032614 src:ddcutil
thanks
Hi Sanford,
On Fri, 10 Mar 2023 01:04:18 -0500 Sanford Rockowitz
wrote:
Bug report #1031259 vs ddcutil 1.4.1-1 suggests installing files in
/usr/lib/modules-load.d to ensure that driver i2
Control: tags -1 pending
Hi Steve,
On 12-03-2023 19:56, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Please unblock our stack of shim and shim-signed packages.
As mentioned on IRC, I like to age it one or two days more, but the
hints are already in my hints file (commented out), so I'll do that
tomorrow or on Tue
-12 21:32:33.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+liferea (1.14.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * New upstream version 1.14.1
+Contains fix for CVE-2023-1350 which is a RCE when the option "Extract
+full content from HTML5 and Google AMP" is enable on a feed (Closes:
+#1032822)
Hi Timo,
On 15-03-2023 19:15, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
There's actually 22.3.7 out, which I was thinking of uploading to sid,
Is that following the freeze policy [1]? I.e. targeted fixes? (It might
be, I don't know the release policy of mesa).
since it's the last release of the 22.3.x series. M
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Yadd,
On 15-03-2023 13:38, Yadd wrote:
[ Reason ]
node-webpack is vulnerable to cross-realm object access
(#1032904, CVE-2023-28154).
This doesn't look like a targeted fix, but rather seems to include much
more.
How about reverting and providing a fix only for
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
On 16-03-2023 00:16, Christian Kastner wrote:
On 2023-03-13 18:28, Christian Kastner wrote:
[ Impact ]
The new versions are in far better shape: they've catched missing
dependencies, added patches, improved the build process, etc.
Apologies, I was only thinking
Dear all,
On 15-03-2023 21:33, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
We're overdue for 11.7 and need it done with a keyring update included
before bookworm can be released. The wheels are turning on the keyring so
how do dates in April look for everybody? Saturdays are 1st (probably too
soon), 8th, 15th, 22
Hi Stefano,
On 14-03-2023 22:44, Stefano Brivio wrote:
- full slirp4netns(1) compatibility not granted
I've never heard of this before, what does that mean for the user?
[ Tests ]
I ran the upstream test suite against the packaged version on a
Debian testing (Bookworm) x86_64 system.
If yo
Control: retitle -1 Build-Depends for tests should not be key packages
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi Thorsten,
On 15-03-2023 12:55, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
mksh is only a key package because shunit2 build-depends on it.
Ack.
(Would be nice if the key package status is shown in tracker or so…
Hi Robin,
On 17-03-2023 19:36, Robin ALEXANDER wrote:
I filled 2 bugs (one for each package) that explain why I am requesting
to exclude my 2 packages from bookworm.
- 1033126 (odr-dabmux)
- 1033127 (odr-padenc)
As these bugs are now at severity "serious", autoremoval will handle it.
Paul
O
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Michael,
On 14-03-2023 13:47, Michael Biebl wrote:
please unblock package network-manager.
The current version in testing is 1.42.0-1 and upstream has created two
stable point releases 1.42.2 and 1.42.4, cherry-picking various fixes
into the nm-1.42 stable branch,
Hi Pirate,
On 19-03-2023 16:32, Pirate Praveen wrote:
On Sun, Mar 19 2023 at 02:31:02 PM +01:00:00 +01:00:00, Sebastian
Ramacher wrote:
This type of change is not acceptable during hard freeze. Please revert.
ok then we can just remove the version currently in testing.
Can you elaborate wh
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
On 15-03-2023 09:40, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
The current failure on s390x is caused by endian
issues in androguard, a dependency.
Has that issue been reported? Please add a link.
Normally we expect a debdiff attached to an unblock. This is mostly to
trigg
Hi,
On 20-03-2023 17:16, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I haven't really ever been able to troubleshoot it. I don't have access
to a s390x box. And:
~ $ ssh zelenka.debian.org
ssh: connect to host zelenka.debian.org port 22: Connection timed out
~ $
That's the only porterbox I could find
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On 20-03-2023 22:15, Joel Rosdahl wrote:
Would it be
appropriate to use testing-proposed-updates for this, as suggested on the freeze
policy page?
I'm wondering where you are reading that. The text says: If there are
unrelated changes in unstable, we ask you to revert
Hi Pirate,
Thanks for reaching out.
On 20-03-2023 16:44, Pirate Praveen wrote:
I request bookworm-ignore tags for these bugs (as such there is
no immediate breakage, just unmaintained upstreams for these packages).
> yarnpkg: 980316,958686, 1002902, 980316
> node-har-validator: 1024575
> nod
Hi,
On 21-03-2023 22:11, Joel Rosdahl wrote:
I think that what made things unclear to me was the "revert" part which just
didn't fit my mental model of how things work. But under "Applying for an
unblock" I now read "[...] revert [...] e.g. by using a
new-version+reallyold-version versioning sch
Hi,
With the point release scheduled for April 29th, it's probably good to
have at least one weekend in between, or do people not mind doing two
weekends in a row?
On 17-03-2023 15:59, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 11:26:00AM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
So, shall w
Hi,
On Thu, 23 Mar 2023 11:58:32 + James Addison wrote:
I'm not sure what to do next and will take a pause to think about it; I'd be
grateful for suggestions.
Having taken a look at the affected packages, I think it's beter at this
stage to say that bookworm doesn't support Geode LX (and
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
Hi Mo,
On 25-03-2023 15:39, M. Zhou wrote:
Please unblock package fish
Not yet uploaded. This package does not have a proper
autopkgtest, manual unblock needed.
Please go ahead and remove the moreinfo tag once that happened.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Descri
Hi Otto,
On 26-03-2023 06:48, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
Based on
https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=mariadb-server&searchon=names&suite=all§ion=all
this 10.5.19-0+deb11u1 is still pending and a stable update of Debian
11 "Bullseye" has not yet been made in March 2023?
https://lists.debi
Package: release.debian.org
Tags: moreinfo
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: ond...@sury.org
Control: affects -1 src:php8.2
Dear Ondřej,
I just noticed that security bug 1031368 is fixed in unstable was fixed
in php8.2 version 8.2.3-1. That didn't migr
Hi Ondřej,
On 26-03-2023 08:36, Ondřej Surý wrote:
just a quick reply - PHP already has a security (and if I remember correctly
release) team exception from the last time. So, we already had this talk about
upstream policies.
I *suspect* the same, but because of the shear amount of work ongo
Hi Salvatore,
On 26-03-2023 13:57, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
redis is on the radar for that, recent uploads for unstable did fix
some (arguably no-dsa) CVEs. Redis is though not able to migrate to
testing. Can you have a look and if the testing regressions are fase
positives or to be ignore fi
Hi,
On 29-03-2023 04:06, z Spring wrote:
I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to inquire about the
construction of Debian Rootfs. I was wondering if you could kindly provide some
information on how your team constructs this system, and whether the method of
construction ha
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 27-03-2023 18:15, Eberhard Beilharz wrote:
While keyman has autopkgtests and so would qualify for automatic migration, the
tests are skipped on s390x.
Ack.
Included are only small changes: one is a small fix in the postinst script,
-set -e
+# Don't call `set -
Hi Andreas,
From: Jonathan Wiltshire
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 10:03:28AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
[ Reason ]
build pocl against llvm-15 insteal of llvm-14
this is blocked by llvm-toolchain-15 since it picked up a dependency on
the version in sid
Unblocked; thanks.
I'm not confident tha
Hi Andreas,
On 02-04-2023 11:15, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
On 02/04/2023 08.57, Paul Gevers wrote:
I'm not confident that llvm-toolchain-15 will get resolved soon. Can
you upload the version that you have in unstable to
testing-proposed-updates please?
Will do. That would be 3.1-3~de
Hi Thomas,
On 03-04-2023 21:59, la...@debian.org wrote:
this is a unblock request for dracut 059-4.
Please, next time file an unblock bug report (using $(reportbug
release.debian.org). Messages like these tend to get lost on our high
volume mail list, particularly if they *look* like unblock
Hi,
On 03-04-2023 21:51, la...@debian.org wrote:
this is a unblock request for fai 6.0.1.
unblocked (but the comment for dracut applies too).
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Ondřej, Moritz,
On 04-04-2023 08:58, Ondřej Surý wrote:
In all honesty, I thought that the pre-negotiated exception for PHP
does apply to all future Debian releases, so it did come as surprise
that I have to explain this again.
Sorry, that wasn't my intention. Maybe I should try to keep a b
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Lev,
On 04-04-2023 15:05, Lev Lamberov wrote:
Please, rebuild ppl against swi-prolog 9.0.4+dfsg-2 in unstable. The
ppl package in unstable and testing was build against the older
swi-prolog version, containing older library. For more information,
please see this swi
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Sebastian,
On 02-04-2023 22:06, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
[x] attach debdiff against the package in testing
The debdiff that I get with $(d) contains two new patches that are not
part of d/p/series and were not part of your debdiff (they look like
copies of e
Hi Lev,
On 05-04-2023 07:38, Lev Lamberov wrote:
Вт 04 апр 2023 @ 21:42 Paul Gevers :
On 04-04-2023 15:05, Lev Lamberov wrote:
Please, rebuild ppl against swi-prolog 9.0.4+dfsg-2 in unstable. The
ppl package in unstable and testing was build against the older
swi-prolog version, containing
Hi Patrick,
On 07-04-2023 00:42, Patrick Franz wrote:
We'd like to request an unblock such that qt6-tools 6.4.2-1 can migrate to
testing
once llvm-toolchain-15 has migrated.
That's fine, but I don't expect llvm-toolchain-15 to migrate before the
bookworm release, and I don't think this cosme
Hi Bastian,
On 07-04-2023 21:01, Paul Gevers wrote:
Hi,
On 06-04-2023 18:47, Bastian Germann wrote:
Please rebuild python-libzim against the new zimlib.
But zimlib should not have been uploaded to unstable before the bookworm
release. Please see bug 1027959 for discussion.
Paul
26204)
+Thanks to Andreas Henriksson and Helge Deller
+
+ -- Paul Gevers Thu, 06 Apr 2023 16:25:47 +0200
+
+tar (1.34+dfsg-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload
+
+ [ Mechtilde ]
+ * [730f266] Improved d/copyright with patch
+from Bastian Germann (Closes: #10
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
Hi Rob,
On 02-04-2023 20:07, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
(Package hasn't been uploaded yet; this is a preapproval request.)
Please go ahead
Please remove the moreinfo tag once the upload has happened.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital s
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 04-04-2023 23:58, Jordi Mallach wrote:
I'm asking for a pre-approval of this documentation-only source package.
If approved, I would update this bug with the relevant parts of the
diff, seek a final ack, and upload within the next week.
In principle that's OK, but
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Martin,
On 05-04-2023 10:26, Martin wrote:
I like to get clearance for uploading python-nbxmpp 4.2.2-2 to unstable, to get
it into bookworm. 4.2.2-1 is already uploaded to experimental. The
package has extensive autopkgtests. debdiff attached.
python-nbxmpp is not
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Martin,
On 05-04-2023 10:52, Martin wrote:
I like to get clearance for uploading gajim 1.7.3-2 to unstable, to get
it into bookworm. 1.7.3-1 is already uploaded to experimental. The
package has extensive autopkgtests. debdiff attached.
Same as with python-nbxmpp,
Hi,
On 11-04-2023 15:21, Simon McVittie wrote:
Uploaded and built on all release architectures. There seem to be reports
of autopkgtest regressions, I'm not sure which of those are flaky and which
(if any) are genuine issues.
A brief inspection suggests they are all flaky. I rescheduled most o
Dear backports team,
On our pre-release checklist [1] it's noted that we should coordinate a
test build in the bookworm-backports archive. We recently did this for
security and there issues were encountered [2] showing the value of such
an exercise.
Do you want to perform such a test build in bo
Dear DSA,
As is custom for the Release Team, I'm asking you what your plans are
with respect to testing upgrading DSA maintained machines to bookworm.
If my information is correct, in the past you'd first upgrade a non
critical machine to see if there's anything broken in bookworm that
prevents
Hi Adrian,
On 22-03-2023 12:08, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Suggestions for both
https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/ReleaseCheckList
https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/ReleaseCheckList/BookwormCheckList
They are Wiki's ;). But thanks for discussing it first.
Before the release
Add "
Hi,
On 12-04-2023 12:00, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
On 12/04/2023 10.52, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
+Restrictions:
+ allow-stderr,
+ needs-root,
+ breaks-testbed,
With these restrictions, I don't think the tests would run on debci
(Paul, please correct me if I am wrong). I hardly see the benefit
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Patrick
On 27-03-2023 17:06, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
as mentioned in my unblock #1033554 for mlt I were a bit too stupid to read the
freeze policy correctly. I would like to see kdenlive 22.12.3-2 in bookworm,
it just fixes some upstream bugs and two Debian bugs (mis
Hi all,
On 26-03-2023 19:55, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Nobody else seems to have replied yet, so... :-)
Two weeks have gone by since the last mail in this thread.
If I did the bookkeeping correctly, the missing necessary teams are press and
release team, as I now have:
kibi - 6, 13, 20, 27
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 08:35:24 +0200 Mike Gabriel
wrote:
[...]
> I am aware that mate-utils 1.20.2-2 never migrated to testing because of
> this, so I ask for a specific exception here to unblock mate-utils. Thanks!
In unblock bugs we request a debdiff against what is c
Hi all,
On 24-03-2019 16:47, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 24-03-2019 07:21, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>> ruby-globalid (0.4.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium
>> .
>>* Team upload
>>* New upstream version 0.4.2
>>* Add patch to fix regression (Clos
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Mike,
On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 21:00:57 + Mike Gabriel
wrote:
> On Mo 29 Apr 2019 21:28:54 CEST, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 08:35:24 +0200 Mike Gabriel
> > wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> I am aware that mat
Hi Andreas,
On 29-04-2019 20:41, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 19:05:00 + Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Andreas Tille:
>>> Please unblock package htslib
>
>> Please include the bug id of that removal bug in a follow up and remove
>> the moreinfo bug wh
Hi
Bug 914991 had this list removed.
augustus | 3.3+dfsg-2 | hurd-i386
augustus | 3.3.2+dfsg-1 | i386, kfreebsd-i386
bio-eagle |2.4.1-1 | i386, kfreebsd-i386
delly |0.7.8-1 | hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-i386
grabix |0.1.7-1 | hurd-i386, i386, kfreebsd-i386
libhts-dev |
Hi,
On 30-04-2019 21:39, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I have no idea why the packages re-appeared after #914991 was closed.
Probably newer versions got uploaded to unstable, which built on all
releases where they could.
> Is there any way to easily ask ftpmaster to redo the removals that where
> done
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
On 01-05-2019 15:06, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> pythonmagick was patched to compile with ImageMagick 7 in 0.9.19-1
> whereas buster is still on 6. This resulted the package failing to
> import, see #928103 (missed to close this in the changelog).
> I disabled t
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 17:25:24 +0200 Ivo De Decker wrote:
> Remove the moreinfo tag from this bug once the upload is in t-p-u.
Somehow forgotten as the upload happened on 2019-04-18.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Hideki,
Kind ping. Do you have any intent to follow up on your request for the
unblock of ubuntu-keyring? Please respond on my remarks.
Paul
On 06-04-2019 21:24, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> Hi Hideki,
>
> On Sat, 23 Mar 2019 23:36:50 +0900 Hidek
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
On Sun, 14 Apr 2019 20:30:00 + Niels Thykier wrote:
> Please go ahead with this patch and remove the moreinfo tag once it has
> been fixed.
The upload happened (two of them), the removal of the moreinfo tag was
missing.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
Hi Nicoo,
Ping.
On Sun, 14 Apr 2019 06:27:00 + Niels Thykier wrote:
> I cannot see these changes in unstable, so we cannot unblock them (nor
> do I see them NEW). Please upload this and remove the moreinfo tag once
> it is in unstable and ready for unblocking.
I noticed in the other bug yo
Control: tags -1 d-i moreinfo confirmed
On 01-05-2019 22:08, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Please unblock package wpa. The followup update to unstable for wpa
> 2:2.7+git20190128+0c1e29f-5 fixes one additional security issue
> ("EAP-pwd message reassembly issue with unexpected fragment"). It got
>
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Scott,
On 02-05-2019 18:08, Scott Leggett wrote:
> I need some advice on the best way to address a trio of security-related
> RC bugs in dhcpcd5 (#928056, #928104, #928105). These are fixed upstream
> in 7.2.1.
>
> The version currently in testing is 7.1.0. I've pack
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Sat, 06 Apr 2019 22:59:16 +0200 Nicolas Braud-Santoni
wrote:
> The latest upstream release contains security-critical changes (see #926551).
Please be aware that without updates to that bug, your package will be
removed from buster soon. When that happens, your packa
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Benjamin,
On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 13:01:31 +0200 Benjamin Drung
wrote:
> This version fixes the test_xen_virtual test case (bug #922352) and
> exposes tornado4 as tornado for zmq.eventloop.ioloop (bug #924763). Our
> salt 2018.3.3+dfsg1-1 package introduced a big patch t
tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Michael,
On 30-04-2019 14:21, Michael Fladischer wrote:
> It had a missing dependency on python(3)-pkg-resources. 1.1.1-2 adds those
> missing packages to Depends, see attached debdiff.
This would be OK for an unblock, but... your debdiff only shows the
changes between 1.1.1-
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 03-05-2019 20:37, Dr. Tobias Quathamer wrote:
> please see https://bugs.debian.org/825022 for a short discussion about
> missing manpages. I did not upload a new version of the manpages
> package, because I didn't think that this could be release critical.
>
> However
Hi Magnus,
On 05-05-2019 23:42, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> after some investigation, I believe I have the issues in sa-exim under
> control. The broken spool files were due to a memory corruption that could
> easily be worked around. The issue with CHUNKING was mainly that SpamAssassin
> uses CRL
Hmm.
On 06-05-2019 21:52, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Also make sure you can help them moving forward with their unblock
> request, by making sure your *targeted* fixes are available in unstable.
> sa-exim would need to be unblocked first or at the same time, so don't
> add unnecessar
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
On 03-05-2019 23:28, Dr. Tobias Quathamer wrote:
> Am 03.05.19 um 22:58 schrieb Dr. Tobias Quathamer:
>> I've attached the .dsc debdiff. I can confirm that the debdiff of the
>> binary packages shows the newly included manpages.
>
> ... however, the Replaces/Br
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Hi Scott,
On 06-05-2019 05:30, Scott Leggett wrote:
> On 2019-05-05.20:47, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
>> As for all those CVEs are known (see respective bugs and
>> security-tracker), can you please add the rspective CVE ids as well to
>> the debian/changelog
Hi,
On 27-04-2019 09:31, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> Please CC debian...@lists.debian.org and me.
Done.
[...]
> IIUC, there're two concerns for Go packages.
[...]
> 2. binNMU without full source upload for security-master.
>
>It's still not possible, and I don't know there's any effort to
>
Control: tags 928185 - wontfix
Control: tags 928185 moreinfo
Control: tags 926009 wontfix
Hi doko,
I assume you wanted to tag the openjdk-11 bug as wontfix, not the
unblock bug, changed that above.
On Thu, 2 May 2019 13:59:46 +0200 Matthias Klose wrote:
> Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
> Control:
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Vincent,
I fear you're not going to like my mail, sorry.
On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 09:18:26 +0100 Vincent Bernat wrote:
> Please unblock package bpftrace
>
> Upstream told me 0.9 is the first release where the API (to write
> bpftrace code snippets) has been stabilized,
retitle 928004 please rebuild against unicode-data 12.1.0~pre1-2
reassign 928004 node-unicode-tr51
usertag 928004 unicode-data-12
thanks
On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 10:10:18 +0100 Alastair McKinstry
wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> U
retitle 928006 please rebuild against unicode-data 12.1.0~pre1-2
reassign 928006 node-unicode-property-aliases
usertag 928006 unicode-data-12
thanks
On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 10:12:54 +0100 Alastair McKinstry
wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.de
retitle 928008 please rebuild against unicode-data 12.1.0~pre1-2
reassign 928008 node-unicode-property-value-aliases
usertag 928008 unicode-data-12
thanks
On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 10:18:11 +0100 Alastair McKinstry
wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packa
retitle 928008 please rebuild against unicode-data 12.1.0~pre1-2
reassign 928008 node-unicode-property-aliases-ecmascript
usertag 928008 unicode-data-12
thanks
On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 10:21:47 +0100 Alastair McKinstry
wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@
retitle 928014 please rebuild against unicode-data 12.1.0~pre1-2
reassign 928014 wine-development
usertag 928014 unicode-data-12
thanks
On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 10:23:17 +0100 Alastair McKinstry
wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Us
retitle 928012 please rebuild against unicode-data 12.1.0~pre1-2
reassign 928012 node-unicode-property-aliases-ecmascript
reassign 928008 node-unicode-property-value-aliases
usertag 928012 unicode-data-12
thanks
Copy/pasting correctly is hard.
On 09-05-2019 12:23, Paul Gevers wrote:
> reti
retitle 928017 please rebuild against unicode-data 12.1.0~pre1-2
reassign 928017 node-unicode-property-value-aliases-ecmascript
usertag 928017 unicode-data-12
thanks
On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 10:26:11 +0100 Alastair McKinstry
wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debia
retitle 928018 please rebuild against unicode-data 12.1.0~pre1-2
reassign 928018 fonttools
usertag 928018 unicode-data-12
thanks
On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 10:27:08 +0100 Alastair McKinstry
wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags:
retitle 928019 please rebuild against unicode-data 12.1.0~pre1-2
reassign 928019 src:wcwidth
usertag 928019 unicode-data-12
thanks
On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 10:27:57 +0100 Alastair McKinstry
wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertag
retitle 928020 please rebuild against unicode-data 12.1.0~pre1-2
reassign 928020 src:jing-trang
usertag 928020 unicode-data-12
thanks
On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 10:29:05 +0100 Alastair McKinstry
wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> User
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 09-05-2019 15:53, Xavier Guimard wrote:
> we are going to fix #927142 (Cyrus-Imapd RC bug). I noticed also that
> there are many spelling errors in this package. Do you think I can add a
> this spelling error patch (joined) or upload a minimal change?
Please make sure
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Kyle,
Is this still relevant?
On Sun, 03 Mar 2019 22:04:35 +0200 Kyle Robbertze
wrote:
> There was a bug in how camomile < 1.0.1-3 was packaged that prevented
> packages from building against it. This has been fixed, but requires
> r-deps to be rebuilt using the fix
Hi all,
We're a bit further than last time.
On 31-03-2019 21:34, Paul Gevers wrote:
[...]
> This is the first time that *I* am trying to coordinate this a bit, so
> help me out. Hinted by some notes, I propose the following, if people
> have time to help out.
Thanks for a
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Benjamin,
On 06-05-2019 12:47, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 02.05.2019, 21:05 +0200 schrieb Paul Gevers:
>> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>>
>> Hi Benjamin,
>>
>> On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 13:01:31 +0200 Benjamin Drung
>
Hi yadd,
On Tue, 07 May 2019 17:20:42 +0200 Xavier Guimard wrote:
> unblock node-unicode-data/0~20190414+gitbf518e99-2
Unblocked, thanks
Paul
Hi Norbert,
On 11-05-2019 02:20, Norbert Preining wrote:
[...]
>> (Maybe you want to reconsider the severity of the bug you closed).
[...]
> Do you propose that I raise severity now post-mortem?
It would make things more obvious when people check later, so if you
don't mind, yes.
Paul
sig
301 - 400 of 1548 matches
Mail list logo
