Bug#983876: unblock: otrs2/6.0.32-1

Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Patrick, On 15-03-2021 15:12, Patrick Matthäi wrote: > reopen #983876 > thanks > > Am 02.03.21 um 19:38 schrieb Paul Gevers: >> Hi Patrick, >> >> On 02-03-2021 16:58, Patrick Matthäi wrote: >>> I just uploaded the otrs2 6.0.32

bullseye and the release notes

Dear all, As I hope you are all aware, we are in the final phase of the Debian 11 'bullseye' release. This means that we also want to get the release notes [1] for bullseye into shape and translated. Following the process that I proposed and used during the buster release, I propose the following

Bug#985390: unblock: squid/4.13-7

Control: tag -1 moreinfo Hi Santiago, On 17-03-2021 09:01, Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote: > Fixing a couple of nasty bugs discovered late, Yes, due to handling of a new binary package that you had migrated into bullseye the day before that wasn't allowed anymore exactly to avoid this class of b

Bug#985390: unblock: squid/4.13-7

Hi Santiago, On 22-03-2021 22:49, Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote: >>> Fixing a couple of nasty bugs discovered late, >> Yes, due to handling of a new binary package that you had migrated into >> bullseye the day before that wasn't allowed anymore exactly to avoid >> this class of bugs. > > Agreed

Bug#985721: unblock: fossil/1:2.15~rc1-1

Hi Barak On 27-03-2021 22:09, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote: > I was preparing one, but upstream released an official 2.15 release. > Which has an exhaustive test suite enabled in the build and passes (by > upstream standards; there are scary messages but they're expected) on > all architectures. >

Bug#985488: New debdiff for pinball 0.3.20201218-3

Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi, On 25-03-2021 15:04, Yadd wrote: > Philippe added an autopkgtest to pinball. The autopkgtest doesn't test the installed binaries substantially. It must be marked as superficial. When that is fixed (and nothing else is changed along the way), it can be unblocked. P

Bug#985590: (pre-approval) unblock: zfs-linux/2.0.3-2

Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Aron On 20-03-2021 15:04, Aron Xu wrote: > Please pre-approve unblock package zfs-linux/2.0.3-2. > > This revision is mainly consisted of the following enhancements: > > 1. Cherry-pick of upstream changes after 2.0.3, which is a subset of 2.0.4 > with >irrelev

Bug#985590: (pre-approval) unblock: zfs-linux/2.0.3-2

Hi Aron, On 30-03-2021 10:01, Aron Xu wrote: > I have reverted 3, and attached is the new debdiff. This looks wrong, no? +# only automatically trim the nvme-only pools. +POOLS=$(zpool list -H | awk '{print $1}') +for pool in ${ZPOOLS[@]}; do Variable is named POOLS, not ZPOOLS. Paul OpenPGP

Bug#985977: unblock: dlt-viewer/2.21.2+dfsg-1

Hi Gianfranco, On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 10:49:38 +0200 Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Seems fine without the compat bump. Please revert. https://release.debian.org/bullseye/FAQ.html (last section). Paul OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Asking advice for libssh2

Hi Nicolas On 28-03-2021 14:24, Nicolas Mora wrote: > Therefore I'm asking your opinion on whether it would be wise to release > libssh2-with-openssl in bullseye? The package uses libgcrypt for a long > time now. And on second thought I wouldn't mind waiting another release > for what could potent

Bug#985629: Bug#981405: unblock (pre-approval): cryptsetup/2:2.3.5-1

Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed Hi Guilhem, On 21-03-2021 14:55, Guilhem Moulin wrote: > On Sun, 21 Mar 2021 at 00:51:06 +0100, Guilhem Moulin wrote: >> I'm seeking pre-approval to upload cryptsetup/2:2.3.5-1 to unstable. >> Hopefully the attached debdiff is not too large/intrusive for inclus

Bug#985958: [pre-approval] unblock: spip/3.2.11-2

Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi David, On 26-03-2021 20:53, David Prévot wrote: > Please unblock package spip This package does have a bit of a track record for security issues. > [ Reason ] > Upstream just released a new minor version to improve PHP 7.4 compat > (latest version already improved P

Re: Asking advice for libssh2

Hi Nicolas, On 02-04-2021 23:08, Nicolas Mora wrote: > So I imagine there's nothing to do here, the unstable package is blocked > from migration [1] and will stay as is until unfreeze I guess? Indeed. Paul OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#986129: unblock: sendmail/8.15.2-22

Control: reassign -1 -2 release-notes Control: retitle -2 sendmail is stopped during upgrades Control: tag -2 patch Control: close -1 Hi Andreas, On 30-03-2021 09:05, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Please unblock package sendmail Unblocked. > sendmail does not cleanly restart after upgrading from bu

Bug#986311: unblock: debian-cloud-images/0.0.4

Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Noah, On 02-04-2021 22:00, Noah Meyerhans wrote: > Please unblock package debian-cloud-images 172 files changed, 3798 insertions(+), 1365 deletions(-) > Primarily I'm requesting this because this source package provides the > debian-cloud-images-packages package th

Bug#986311: unblock: debian-cloud-images/0.0.4

Hi Bastian, On 03-04-2021 21:08, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 08:00:20AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: >> So, I'm very uncomfortable with the union of this key packages tracking >> package > > Then please drop the UUD entry that forces it to be a key pack

Bug#986311: unblock: debian-cloud-images/0.0.4

Hi Noah, On 03-04-2021 17:44, Noah Meyerhans wrote: > It is sufficient for the Depends packages to be available in the next > release. Unfortunately, our package handling goes per source package, not by binary packages. >> Should the current package in testing be released with bullseye if we >>

Bug#986311: SRM input requested: Re Bug#986311: unblock: debian-cloud-images/0.0.4

Dear SRM colleagues, Your input/confirmation is appreciated on the following issue. tl;dr; are you OK with updating debian-cloud-images in the stable release? On 03-04-2021 21:29, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Noah, > > On 03-04-2021 17:44, Noah Meyerhans wrote: >> It is sufficient

Bug#986213: RM: ansible/2.9.16+dfsg-1.1

Control: tags -1 wontfix Hi, On 08-04-2021 09:54, Christian Kastner wrote: > On 01.04.21 10:49, Raphael Hertzog wrote: >> Shipping bullseye without a core system administration tool like ansible >> is not something that we should do. Our users are the clear losers of this >> situation (and thus D

Re: gavodachs2-server broken in unstable

Hi Markus, This mail fell through the cracks because the sheer amount of traffic on our list. Next time, please file a unblock report to discuss such issues, as they stay on our radar (you can add "pre-approval" to the title). On 18-03-2021 12:42, Markus Demleitner wrote: > Fixing these requires

Bug#985228: unblock: petsc/3.14.5+dfsg1-2

Hi Drew, On 08-04-2021 15:01, Drew Parsons wrote: > While petsc and release is close to mind, I'd like to request > preauthorization for petsc/3.14.5+dfsg1-3 to make a minimal update to > fix Bug#985659 (fixing broken symlinks in docs). You stretched us already quite a bit with -2. What we were m

Re: gavodachs2-server broken in unstable

Hi Markus, On 08-04-2021 13:29, Markus Demleitner wrote: > With "show" you're thinking of > mentioning that in the changelog? No, I meant in the communication with us, in this thread and in the potentially upcoming unblock request. >> Not saying I'd unblock this, but it's not hopeless. > > So,

Bug#986625: unblock: grub2/2.04-17

Control: tags -1 d-i confirmed Hi, Putting kibi in CC for the d-i ACK, just to be sure. Paul On 08-04-2021 12:25, Colin Watson wrote: > Please unblock grub2 2.04-17. The --sbat fix will be needed for d-i > builds once various bits of work on shim are finished, and the verifiers > module change

Bug#986628: unblock: r-cran-rcdklibs/2.3+dfsg-6

Hi Andreas, On 08-04-2021 21:52, Andreas Tille wrote: > Ahhh, I assumed that basic autopkgtest-pkg-r is consider superficial. That's an interesting point. Should they (they're not)? Maybe with R packages autopkgtest-pkg-r may or may not be very extensive? If that's true, than it's currently basic

Bug#986628: unblock: r-cran-rcdklibs/2.3+dfsg-6

Hi Andreas, On 09-04-2021 10:50, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 10:02:02PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: >> On 08-04-2021 21:52, Andreas Tille wrote: >>> Ahhh, I assumed that basic autopkgtest-pkg-r is consider superficial. >> >> That's an interest

Finding a tentative bullseye release date

Dear release team, ftpmasters, press team, cd team, d-i team, The Release Team believes that the state of bullseye is pretty good. Yes, there are some blocking bugs [1] and d-i and shim still need some love, but the state is much better than we remembered from the same time in buster. Last time i

Bug#986698: unblock: gavodachs2-server/2.3+dfsg-1

Control: retitle -1 unblock: gavodachs/2.3+dfsg-1 (pre-approval) Control: tag -1 moreinfo Hi Markus On 09-04-2021 20:09, Markus Demleitner wrote: > Please unblock package gavodachs2-server unblocks are against source packages, so it's "unblock gavodachs" > In case this makes the decision easier

Bug#986618: unblock: zfs-linux/2.0.3-6

Control: tags -1 moreinfo On 08-04-2021 09:17, M. Zhou wrote: > 3. d/test/control: fix i386 autopkgtest failure due to >missing kernel header dependency If you also fix the armhf failure, we don't even need to discuss anything in this unblock request. In my trial, installing linux-hearders-ar

Re: Finding a tentative bullseye release date

Hi Holger, On 10-04-2021 12:59, Holger Wansing wrote: > Maybe the release-team could look into the pending unblock issues for d-i > in the meantime? Were unblock requests filed? If so, can you point me at them as I don't know which unblock requests you're talking about? If not, they don't appear

Bug#986754: unblock: please unblock gcc-9-cross and gcc-9-cross-ports

Hi On 11-04-2021 14:38, Matthias Klose wrote: > please unblock gcc-9-cross and gcc-9-cross-ports, no-change rebuilds using the > gcc-9 version as found in bullseye. unblocked. Paul OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#986618: unblock: zfs-linux/2.0.3-6

Hi, On 14-04-2021 06:28, M. Zhou wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 15:59 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: >> >> If you also fix the armhf failure, we don't even need to discuss >> anything in this unblock request. In my trial, installing >> linux-hearders-arm

Re: Finding a tentative bullseye release date

Hi Holger, On 10-04-2021 18:14, Holger Wansing wrote: >>> 2. A problem came up during freeze regarding input methods for several >>>languages: >>>Starting with bullseye, GNOME depends on ibus, which is not fully >>>compatible with the view of some language teams, who would like to >>>

Bug#986628: unblock: r-cran-rcdklibs/2.3+dfsg-6

Hi Andreas, On 15-04-2021 21:13, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 06:32:40PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: >>> We are working on it makeing them non-superficial. Its the case for >>> r-bioc-* currently[1] and the plan is to do this for all R packages. >

Bug#986929: unblock/tpu: nheko/0.7.2-3+deb11u1

Hi, On 16-04-2021 00:07, Hubert Chathi wrote: > Again, this needs to go through tpu since sid has a newer version Please read our FAQ [1]. We prefer you revert the newer version and prepare a targeted fix in unstable. The tpu route is only available if a package is stuck behind something else tha

Bug#987079: unblock: boxer-data/10.8.21

Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Jonas, On 17-04-2021 11:24, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > [ Tests ] > This bug is covered by autopkgtest (that's how it was spotted), and the > bugfix is confirmed to succeed that test. If you fix the autopkgtest to not be amd64 specific, but also work on the other archi

Re: Bug#931566: Don't complain about suite changes (Acquire::AllowReleaseInfoChange::Suite should be "true")

Hi Julian, David, SRM, On Mon, 8 Jul 2019 09:11:48 +0200 Christoph Berg wrote: > Fwiw, I think this needs fixing in buster, not just in unstable. We're getting close to the release of bullseye and it has been brought to my attention that this bug is still unfixed in buster. Once we release bulls

Bug#986984: unblock: debian-edu-doc/2.11.22

Hi Holger, On 19-04-2021 10:56, Holger Levsen wrote: >> The excuses says it's blocked because it "does not have autopkgtest". > > speaking of which, what would be a non superficial autopkgtest for > debian-edu-doc? would be running "file" on all created html, pdf and > epub files be enough? (an

Re: Finding a tentative bullseye release date

Hi ftpmasters, Adam, On 09-04-2021 20:47, Paul Gevers wrote: > Dear release team, ftpmasters, press team, cd team, d-i team, [...] > We propose to aim for a release date in May. Would either of the > following work for you and do you have any preference? > - May 1 > - May 8 >

Bug#987329: unblock: ceph/14.2.20-2

Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Thomas, On 21-04-2021 22:33, Thomas Goirand wrote: > I've uploaded version 14.2.20-2 of Ceph. This is the last point release > from usptream, including the fixes for CVE-2021-20288 and CVE-2020-27839. > > With such large software such as Ceph, the debdiff can be quit

Bug#987015: [pre-approval] unblock: python-apt/2.2.0

tags -1 confirmed moreinfo Hi Julian, On 15-04-2021 18:28, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > Want to bump version number to stable series versioning, mostly, > update the mirror list, and remove invalid PIE disablement which > triggers build failures in downstreams (it fails with LTO; I think > it's a

Bug#987363: RM: janus/0.10.9-1

Control: reassign -1 src:janus Control: severity -1 serious Control: merge -1 946412 Hi Jonas, On 22-04-2021 14:47, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > As tracked in bug#946412, janus is unsuitable for long-term maintained > releases > and should therefore sbe dropped from bullseye now it is frozen. Havi

Re: Finding a tentative bullseye release date

Hi Cyril, On 23-04-2021 15:13, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> Seems like our current best option is May 22 if you can make it. > > That's definitely not what I would call “best option” from an > installer point of view. I hear you. So, I fear that we're getting into a situation where everything excep

Bug#987556: unblock: stopmotion/0.8.5-3

Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Barak, On 25-04-2021 16:46, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote: > + * bump to debhelper 13 This will need to be reverted. See our FAQ [1] section: "I bumped the debhelper compat level, why is it rejected?" Alternatively, if nothing else changes in the binary packages, you c

Bug#987649: unblock: libxcrypt/1:4.4.18-4

Control: tags -1 confirmed d-i Hi kibi, To be totally sure, I understood from our IRC chat yesterday that you're OK with migrating udeb's like this one at this moment. On 27-04-2021 00:47, Marco d'Itri wrote: > Please unblock package libxcrypt > > [ Reason ] > This fixes some related issues whi

Bug#987718: unblock: fdroidserver/2.0.1-1

Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Hans-Christoph, On 28-04-2021 13:20, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > 2.0.1 release includes only narrow bug and compatibility fixes. This > package has an extensive autopkgtest suite. I noticed it fails on ppc64el because zipalign is not available there. Can you run

Bug#987015: [pre-approval] unblock: python-apt/2.2.0

Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Julian, On 29-04-2021 10:42, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > I had to add another bugfix to the release. Ack. > I added the full debdiff against 2.1.7 again, as well as the added > changes against the pre-approved version. Appreciated. Please go ahead and remove the

Bug#987561: [pre-approval] unblock: fuse3/3.10.3-1

Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo d-i Hi László, On 25-04-2021 18:34, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > While it's a new upstream release, it only contains a bugfix [1] and > correcting spelling mistakes. > The actual change is in lib/fuse.c and very small [2]. Other changes > are for the examp

Bug#987795: unblock: liferea/1.13.5-2

gkt: +34d26be00328a68d2f1625c78b54dc168da0648e.patch (Closes: #987448) + + -- Paul Gevers Tue, 27 Apr 2021 20:27:39 +0200 + liferea (1.13.5-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream version 1.13.5 diff -Nru liferea-1.13.5/debian/patches/34d26be00328a68d2f1625c78b54dc168da0648e.patch liferea-1.13.5/debian/patc

Bug#987766: unblock: open-iscsi/2.1.3-2

Control: tags -1 moreinfo d-i Control: retitle -1 unblock: open-iscsi/2.1.3-3 Hi Ritesh, On 29-04-2021 10:23, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > The open-iscsi-udeb package is not installable in the d-i environment > because of the unavailable respective udeb package for libopeniscsiusr. Ouch. If I unde

Bug#987776: unblock: bind9/1:9.16.15-1

Control: tags -1 moreinfo d-i Hi Ondřej, On 29-04-2021 12:19, Ondřej Surý wrote: This is a confusing debdiff. > [ Reason ] > Upstream security release update of the bind9 package. 136 files changed, 7112 insertions(+), 10801 deletions(-) Really? All that for a security release? > [ Impact ]

Bug#987658: unblock: openjdk-11-jre-dcevm/11.0.11+9-1

Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Emmanuel, On 27-04-2021 13:47, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Please unblock package openjdk-11-jre-dcevm 333 files changed, 8389 insertions(+), 2196 deletions(-) That's not reviewable. > openjdk-11-jre-dcevm/11.0.10+1-1 in testing is currently unusable, it > throws an er

Bug#987766: unblock: open-iscsi/2.1.3-2

Hi, On 30-04-2021 17:03, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > I will go ahead with the upload now and will untag this bug report of > `moreinfo`. That's not what I meant. I'll try to be more clear next time. You're debdiff showed only the content of the open-iscsi binary package (which wasn't affected by

Bug#987958: buster-pu: package liferea/1.12.6-1+deb10u1

f1625c78b54dc168da0648e.patch (Closes: #987448) + + -- Paul Gevers Fri, 30 Apr 2021 20:54:00 +0200 + liferea (1.12.6-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream release diff -Nru liferea-1.12.6/debian/patches/34d26be00328a68d2f1625c78b54dc168da0648e.patch

Bug#987658: unblock: openjdk-11-jre-dcevm/11.0.11+9-1

Hi Emmanuel On 01-05-2021 14:43, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Every time OpenJDK is > updated in Debian, the corresponding DCEVM package has to be updated as > well, otherwise it's likely to fail or crash. That's exactly what > happens currently in testing, we have OpenJDK 11.0.11 with DCEVM > 11.0.10,

Bug#987299: unblock: gstreamer1.0/1.18.4-1

Hi Sebastian, On 03-05-2021 10:21, Sebastian Dröge wrote: > On Sat, 2021-05-01 at 22:10 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: >> >> On 21-04-2021 08:31, Sebastian Dröge wrote: >>> Please unblock package gstreamer1.0 >> >> unblocked. >> >>> This does not a

Re: Options for fixing Thunar security issue in testing

Hi Yves-Alexis, On 13-05-2021 19:13, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > I'll upload 4.16.8 to sid anyway so we have some unstable exposure, but I'd > welcome a hint in a direction which would be acceptable for the release team. I haven't looked at it, but a) be warned that if we go for commits only (th

Bug#987836: unblock: openjdk-11/11.0.11+9-1 and openjdk-17/17~19-1

Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Matthias, On 30-04-2021 16:57, Matthias Klose wrote: > Please unblock the openjdk-11 and openjdk-17 packages. Can you please attach a debdiff to the bug for each package like we always ask for unblocks. In this case it's even more relevant because our tools fail to c

Bug#987658: unblock: openjdk-11-jre-dcevm/11.0.11+9-1

Hi Emmanuel, On 01-05-2021 14:43, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > I agree the diff is not reviewable, but it can be seen as an update of > the DCEVM code to the same state as the OpenJDK code that was already > accepted in testing. The extra DCEVM patches were simply rebased with no > changes on top of Op

Bug#987766: unblock: open-iscsi/2.1.3-2

Hi Ritesh, On 12-05-2021 18:27, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > The package has been uploaded to Unstable. It has built proper on all > supported architectures. You may want to consider unblocking this build > revision. The armhf udeb package has an unmet dependency. Paul OpenPGP_signature Descrip

Bug#988276: unblock: base-files/11.1

Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Santiago, On 09-05-2021 12:25, Santiago Vila wrote: > The changes are of two types: > > a) Changes for standards compliance and bugs which are trivial to fix > (at the top of changelog) and > > b) The "branding" changes which always happen before a stable release >

Bug#988492: buster-pu: package ircii/20190117-1

Control: tags -1 moreinfo On 14-05-2021 09:15, Håvard Flaget Aasen wrote: > This is a release to fix CVE-2021-29376, which is also Debian bug #986214. [0] > The change has been taken from the upstream version 20210314 which is > known to work. It is also similar to the commit the scrollz package h

Bug#988492: buster-pu: package ircii/20190117-1

Control: tags -1 - moreinfo OOPS. On 14-05-2021 22:25, Paul Gevers wrote: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > On 14-05-2021 09:15, Håvard Flaget Aasen wrote: >> This is a release to fix CVE-2021-29376, which is also Debian bug #986214. >> [0] >> The change has been take

Bug#987658: unblock: openjdk-11-jre-dcevm/11.0.11+9-1

Hi Emmanuel, On 15-05-2021 00:58, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > I've compared DCEVM 11.0.10 [1] and 11.0.11 [2], Are commits f8bc235 and 10263b1 the head of the OpenJDK archive? Does OpenJDK in Debian carry any patches you want to have too? I start to realize that src:openjdk-11 is probably more than

Bug#988012: Bug#988190: unblock: diaspora-installer/0.7.14.0+debian2

Hi Pirate, On 14-05-2021 12:46, Pirate Praveen wrote: > (There was comment on the bug before the update, so not sure if the bug pings are actually working) I pinged the bug yesterday and I see today that the autoremoval has been delayed. All seems as intended. Paul OpenPGP_signature Descript

Bug#988799: unblock: libphp-phpmailer/6.2.0-2

88732) + + -- Paul Gevers Tue, 18 May 2021 21:29:05 +0200 + libphp-phpmailer (6.2.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream release diff -Nru libphp-phpmailer-6.2.0/debian/patches/0001-Match-all-RFC3986-scheme-patterns.patch libphp-phpmailer-6.2.0/debian/patches/0001-Match-all-RFC3986-s

Re: Bug#987504: imagemagick: attempt to perform an operation not allowed by the security policy `EPS'

Hi, First off, thanks Adrian for raising the concern. In general, at this stage we don't like packages breaking other packages. On 28-04-2021 13:19, Adrian Bunk wrote: >> No time for a more lenghty reply to this right now, but our point was >> exactly to bring the same patch (already applied in t

Bug#988083: unblock: micro-evtd/3.4-6

Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Ryan, On 06-05-2021 07:33, Ryan Tandy wrote: > #988119: the daemon creates its pid and status files with mode 666, > start-stop-daemon doesn't like that and refuses to stop the daemon. > > I don't know what the appropriate severity is for that one. If it's RC I > can

Bug#988740: unblock: glibc/2.31-12

Hi Cyril On 20-05-2021 08:23, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Having udeb-producing packages change under our feet when we're in > the middle of unentangling the rendering mess isn't exactly nice… I'm terribly sorry, but I thought we discussed migrating udeb generating packages recently on IRC #d-releas

Bug#988830: [pre-approval] unblock e2fsprogs [Was: Bug#987641: e2fsprogs: FTBFS on armel/armhf with a 64-bit kernel]

Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Severity: normal Tags: d-i moreinfo Hi Theodore, On 20-05-2021 00:11, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote: > Ping to the debian-release bug. Unfortunately, there was no release.debian.org bug to track this. Due to the

Bug#988814: unblock: gtk+2.0/2.24.33-2

Control: tags -1 confirmed d-i On 19-05-2021 21:54, Simon McVittie wrote: > Please unblock package gtk+2.0 Ok from my side. As this upload is to fix the d-i issue I'm pretty sure that debian-boot is also fine, but I promised kibi this morning that I'll follow the process and wait for an explicit

Bug#988234: unblock: acorn/8.0.5+ds+~cs19.19.27-2

Control: tag -1 confirmed moreinfo Hi Yadd, On 08-05-2021 13:30, Yadd wrote: > [ Reason ] > Buster to Bullseye transition needs a real node-acorn package (#986134) I pinged ftp on IRC some days ago, but the package didn't land yet. We need the package in the archive to unblock. Please remove the

Bug#988421: unblock: pypy3/7.3.4+dfsg-2

Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Stefano, [Your report didn't make it to the list due to the large debdiff]. On Wed, 12 May 2021 11:24:53 -0400 Stefano Rivera wrote: > Please unblock package pypy3 > > This is a long-shot request. Boo, I hate those (jesting, but partially serious, see [1] ). > [

Bug#988585: unblock: grub2/2.04-18

Control: tags -1 d-i confirmed Hi, This needs an ACK from d-boot as well. On 16-05-2021 12:05, Colin Watson wrote: > Please unblock grub2 2.04-18. This is mostly fixes from Steve to sort > out UEFI Secure Boot on i386. The upstream patch to fix section size > calculation *seems* to only fix a

Bug#988832: unblock: libx11/2:1.7.1-1

Control: tags -1 d-i confirmed Hi, On 20-05-2021 10:26, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Please unblock package libx11 This needs also an ack from d-i, boot CC-ed. > This fixes CVE-2021-31535, a bug in libX11 which could lead to the > execution of additional X requests due to insufficient buffer

Bug#988926: unblock: pyyaml/5.3.1-4

Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Stefano, On 21-05-2021 18:07, Stefano Rivera wrote: > [ Stefano Rivera ] > * Resolve CVE-2020-14343, more trivial RCEs in .load() and FullLoader. > (Closes: #966233) As mentioned on IRC (#d-devel), this seems to cause failure of the lava autopkgtest. Did pyya

Bug#988740: unblock: glibc/2.31-12

Hi kibi, On 24-05-2021 06:30, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Nothing dramatic, we'll be more explicit next time and pick an option > for real instead of considering both options and letting one pick a > favorite. :) Let's agree on that indeed. It's a shame that we get into these annoyances, while all w

Bug#989025: unblock: micro-evtd/3.4-7

Control: tags -1 d-i confirmed Hi kibi, On 24-05-2021 00:42, Ryan Tandy wrote: > Please unblock package micro-evtd > > [ Reason ] > > Fix micro-evtd creating its pid and status files in /var/run with > world-writable permissions (#988119). > > [ Impact ] > > - The pid and status files in /var

Bug#988627: unblock: broadcom-sta/6.30.223.271-16.1

Hi Roger, On 24-05-2021 19:05, Roger Shimizu wrote: >> control: retitle -1 unblock: broadcom-sta/6.30.223.271-17 >> >> unblock broadcom-sta/6.30.223.271-17 > > ping. > > I'm asking because this package is marked as autoremoval from testing > on June 8th. Although of course slightly annoying for

Bug#995277: unblock: golang-github-klauspost-compress/1.11.7-2

Hi Reinhard, On 29-09-2021 02:56, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > Please unblock package golang-github-klauspost-compress > > The problem is with autopkgtest, on armel and armhf, the test > machines frequently run out of memory when executing the extensive > test suite. As our armhf worker has the mos

Bug#995277: unblock: golang-github-klauspost-compress/1.11.7-2

Hi Reinhard, On 03-10-2021 16:21, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > Note that the test doesn't do xz, but zstd compression, > cf. https://github.com/klauspost/compress/blob/master/zstd/README.md > > so your comment regarding --threads=0 do

Bug#995743: RM: hardlink/0.3.2

Hi Chris, On 05-10-2021 00:17, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > please RM hardlink from testing, to allow util-linux to migrate. > src:util-linux now ships the hardlink program, and on upgrades hardlink > should get deconfigured/removed. See #992498 for additional background. Let's see if a rm hint wo

what's the plan with llvm-toolchain-*

Dear LLVM maintainers, As a Release Team member I'm wondering what your plan is with the different version of llvm-toolchain-* we have in unstable and testing. Currently 4 versions in unstable [1], of which 2 are in testing (9 and 11) [2]. We have a transition bug open to track the removal of 9 [3

Re: netcdf-parallel mini-transition

Hi Alastair, On 27-10-2021 15:35, Alastair McKinstry wrote: > I request permission to undetake the netcdf-parallel transition. Please file a transition bug. We don't have the bandwidth to track this via e-mail. Our tools (and workflow) work with proper (use reportbug) filed transition bugs. Paul

Bug#998012: transition: healpix-cxx

Control: tag -1 confirmed Hi, On 28-10-2021 15:38, Leo Singer wrote: > Upstream SONAME bump. > > pgsphere and healpy will need to be rebuilt. > I will take care of healpy itself as I co-maintain it. As said in bug #996452, please go ahead with the upload. For healpy, apart from the rebuild (whi

Bug#998012: [EXTERNAL] Bug#998012: transition: healpix-cxx

Hi Leo, On 28-10-2021 15:49, Singer, Leo P. (GSFC-6610) wrote: >> For healpy, >> apart from the rebuild (which we can schedule), is there anything else >> that need to happen? I assume a rebuild is all that's needed and you're >> pointing out that you can fix issues when/if they arise. > > No, no

Bug#998012: [EXTERNAL] Bug#998012: transition: healpix-cxx

Hi, On 28-10-2021 21:31, Singer, Leo P. (GSFC-6610) wrote: >> On Oct 28, 2021, at 13:54, Paul Gevers wrote: >> >> Hi Leo, >> >> On 28-10-2021 15:49, Singer, Leo P. (GSFC-6610) wrote: >>>> For healpy, >>>> apart from the rebuild (which we c

Bug#998012: [EXTERNAL] Bug#998012: transition: healpix-cxx

Hi Leo, On 28-10-2021 22:07, Paul Gevers wrote: >> Hold on a second... Christoph is telling me that he needs me to upload >> healpix-cxx to unstable. I am hearing two conflicting things. > > I was talking about healpy. Indeed, please upload healpix-cxx to > unstable to

Bug#998012: [EXTERNAL] Bug#998012: transition: healpix-cxx

Hi Leo, On 30-10-2021 19:28, Singer, Leo P. (GSFC-6610) wrote: > Nothing changed in healpix-cxx, it's just that healpy had linked against and > depended on the old libhealpix-cxx2 package that had the mismatched SONAME. But an regular binNMU would have fixed that without the now hardcoded Build-

Bug#998217: RM: ksysguard/4:5.21.5-2

Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Norbert, On 01-11-2021 09:52, Norbert Preining wrote: > ksysguard is not updated to 5.23, but might be in the future. > For now it blocks plasma 5.23 transition to testing. > Please remove ksysguard from testing. In case there is a new > release compatible with Plasma

Please reject view3dscene-4.0.0-1

Hi colleagues, On 07-11-2021 12:24, Abou Al Montacir wrote: > Hi Release Team, > > I've made a mistake yesterday uploading new View 3D Scene release to > stable instead of unstable. > Can you please reject this upload? > > Thanks and sorry for inconvenience. Paul OpenPGP_signature Descriptio

Bug#976811: transition: php8.1

Hi, On 19-11-2021 20:50, David Prévot wrote: Le 10/11/2021 à 05:16, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit : On 2021-09-05 19:26:39, Ondřej Surý wrote: the PHP 8.1 RC1 was released, so I think it would be better to skip php8.0 […] I’ll update this issue when I am ready. It seems that php-defaults (85)

Bug#976811: transition: php8.1

Hi Ondřej, On 19-11-2021 21:41, Ondřej Surý wrote: I disagree, but I uploaded reverted package. It’s after release and we have two years before next release and a year before PHP 8.2, so unstable could be a bit unstable. It’s not like the bump from php7.4 to php8.1 is that large as it was fro

Bug#976811: [pkg-php-pear] Bug#976811: transition: php8.1

Hi Ondřej, On 23-11-2021 11:52, Ondřej Surý wrote: On 22. 11. 2021, at 22:28, David Prévot wrote: I’m happy to upload it if you or the release team agree. I don’t mind if the transition gets started right now either (even if we have no proper php8.1 as default in experimental to get a grasp of

Bug#1000342: bullseye-pu: package mariadb-10.5 10.5.13-0+deb11u1

Hi Otto, On 25-11-2021 17:15, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: It would be much easier to target a stable update if the date (or at least the month) was published on https://release.debian.org/ https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2019/08/msg0.html """ Following the release of 10.1, we wi

Re: delayed package removal from testing

Hi Jonas, On 28-11-2021 11:41, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: I wonder why debian-parl was removed from testing today, since (as I understand it) the reason for removal was solved 2 days ago. parl-desktop-eu in testing at the time of removal had a dependency on iitalian. It's iitalian that has an RC

Re: chromium: Update to version 94.0.4606.61 (security-fixes)

Hi Andres, On 05-12-2021 03:36, Andres Salomon wrote: So what's happening with chromium in both sid and stable? I saw on d-release that it was removed from testing (#998676 and #998732), with a discussion about ending security support for it in stable. I'm willing to help out with chromium pac

Re: please stop block janus from entering testing

Hi Jonas, On 05-12-2021 16:25, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Now, I have changed my mind and decided that it makes sense for Debian to include Janus in its stable releases despite upstream lack of official support for that. I find the Janus codebase as stable if not more than a lot of other code that

Bug#976811: [pkg-php-pear] Bug#976811: transition: php8.1

Hi all, Bugs have been filed (with the exception of the horde stack, but they are aware) of items we're aware of. Let's give the maintainers a month. I propose we can start the php8.1 transition around Christmas 2021. Does that work for you Ondřej? Paul OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenP

Re: Bug#995212: chromium: Update to version 94.0.4606.61 (security-fixes)

Hi, On 06-12-2021 20:43, Noah Meyerhans wrote: One lesson we may take from Mint, though, is that it's not worth trying to patch Chromium as much as we'd like. Anything that we can do to simplify the Chromium packaging will help us keep the package up-to-date, which in turn will help us keep our

Bug#696680: Bug#693068: release.debian.org: arch-specific dependency should invalidate arch-specific candidate

Hi ADam, On Tue, 25 Dec 2012 17:36:07 + "Adam D. Barratt" wrote: On 24.12.2012 14:08, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > The attached patch appears to dtrt in my tests; I've not applied it > yet as I'd appreciate another set of eyes to check if there's > anything > obviously broken. I've also atta

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >