Hi Bastian, On 03-04-2021 21:08, Bastian Blank wrote: > On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 08:00:20AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: >> So, I'm very uncomfortable with the union of this key packages tracking >> package > > Then please drop the UUD entry that forces it to be a key package and > drop the package from testing. After that we'll stop updating packages > in stable and just fake them into official Debian releases without any > chance of security updates. Would you consider that a better solution?
You sound a bit harsh, please assume good faith. Let me at least point out that I was not aware of earlier discussions about uploading the package to stable releases. I'm just wondering what's the best course of action, and remarks in the original request made me wonder if we should ship the debian-cloud-images in stable releases. We *made* src:debian-cloud-images a key package because of the debian-cloud-images-packages binaries, not because of the debian-cloud-images binary. So, if they seem (maybe just for someone that looks for the first time at it) an ill fit together, maybe we can find a better solution (now or in the future). Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
