Hi kibi,
On 25-05-2021 01:05, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Paul Gevers (2021-05-24):
>> unblocked and aged to 10 days. @kibi, let me know if you need it earlier.
>
> Thanks for the unblock. Do you prefer handling the aging yourself, or
> can I just adjust with either age-days
Control: tags -1 confirmed d-i
@boot: needs d-i ACK. As I believe you are aware of, the upload has
already happened.
@kibi: feel free to age it if/when you see fit
Paul
On 19-05-2021 17:27, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Control: retitle -1 unblock: linux/5.10.38-1 (pre-approval checking)
>
> O
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
On 17-05-2021 02:12, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> Please unblock package broadcom-sta
>
> [ Reason ]
> Fix the unusable broadcom-sta-source package.
>
> [ Impact ]
> It is not possible to build a package using module-assistant and the
> version of broadcom-sta-source in
Hi Thomas,
Ping.
Paul
Note: without reply, we'll close the bug without action
On 20-04-2021 11:03, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> On 2021-04-17 12:02:44 +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@package
tag 989037 moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
On 24-05-2021 11:35, Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
> On Wed, 19 May 2021 22:12:59 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
>> This new rails version renewed its versioned dependency on ruby-marcel.
>> The new ruby-marcel version doesn't look like a targeted fix, so i
Hi all,
On 24-04-2021 00:41, Donald Norwood wrote:
> Indeed, from this and the last few posts in the discussion it reads that
> perhaps June is the better option for the 'timed' ready when ready
> release date.
The progress of fixing the blocking issues in the debian-installer is
good enough to s
Hi,
On 30-05-2021 06:35, Donald Norwood wrote:
> On 5/29/21 9:12 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 10:17:55PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>>> Assuming all goes well
>>> with RC2 and RC3, we'd be looking at the following candidate release dates:
&
Hi Adam,
On Sun, 2 May 2021 20:23:30 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
> [ Reason ]
> It used to be enough to declare the liferea custom scheme as local to
> access resources with a file scheme, but for WebKit2Gtk >= 2.32 it looks
> like it is necessary to register the custom scheme
Hi,
On 01-06-2021 08:06, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> The version is not 4 days in unstable, looks good to me to let it
> migrate to testing (unless Cyril spotted issues in recent d-i tests).
I'm still good to go.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Julian,
Sorry it took so long to reply; pre-approvals are regularly awkward.
On Mon, 17 May 2021 17:07:08 +0200 Julian Andres Klode
wrote:
> Please unblock package apt
Can you elaborate how severe do you think these issues are? I mean, I
guess you were in doubt if
tags 987504 wontfix
thanks
Hi Moritz, Adrian,
On 03-06-2021 20:00, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> Yes, we should not revert this and rather fix fallout in the handful
> of affected packages.
It's really bad we have to do this so late in the cycle, while the
problem was known for so long. Adrian, can
Hi Pirate,
On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:50:18 +0200 Ivo De Decker wrote:
> It seems the RC bug fix is unrelated to the new upstream. Please prepare an
> upload based on the version currently in testing that only contains the
fix
> for the RC bug, not the new upsteam.
Are you going to follow up on thi
Control: tags -1 = confirmed d-i
Hi Theodore,
Sorry it took so long.
On 20-05-2021 19:40, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> That patch is rather long, but it's all mostly of the form:
>
> - tail = (struct ext4_fc_tail *)ext4_fc_tag_val(tl);
> + memcpy(&tail, ext4_fc_tag_val(tl), sizeof(tail));
Hi all,
On 30-05-2021 09:09, Paul Gevers wrote:
> 26 June
> 3 July
> 10 July
> 17 July [Steve (CD), press]
> 24 July [Steve (CD), press]
> 31 July
> 7 August
> 14 August
This can now be updated to:
26 June [Ansgar (ftp)]
3 July[Ansgar (ftp), Sebastian (release),
Hi kibi, Salvatore,
On 03-06-2021 22:31, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Will keep an eye on this, and close this bug report once
> migration has happend (just in case some bit is missing/some typo
> happened or something).
This happened, so this bug can be closed now.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Descrip
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Shengjing,
On 05-06-2021 13:57, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> Please unblock package golang-1.15
You're well aware that golang builds statically so normally we're not
done with just accepting one package. Do we now need to also rebuild
everything that build depends on golan
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Utkarsh,
[While typing a reply to the rails unblock, I checked this request again].
On 24-05-2021 10:17, Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
> We had to bump ruby-marcel to a newer version because the mimemagic
> dependency - which relies on GPL-licensed mime type data from
> freed
Hi Utkarsh,
On 04-06-2021 11:26, Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 1:38 AM Paul Gevers wrote:
>>> You haven't answered my question: "does rails still work with the old
>>> version of ruby-marcel and can the version bump be reverted"
>>
>&g
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Control: retitle -1 unblock: e2fsprogs/1.46.2-1
On 03-06-2021 22:06, Paul Gevers wrote:
> As I can't judge this myself, I'll take your word for it. If the upload
> can happen in the next couple of days, let's have this in unstable and
> if nothing
Hi Alberto,
On 05-06-2021 01:52, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> So if you are ok with the change of dependencies I will upload it to
> unstable and request a new unblock.
Ack. But next time, please create a new unblock (pre-approval) request.
This bug is closed and your message had a high chance of bein
Hi all,
On 04-06-2021 06:49, Paul Gevers wrote:
> 26 June [Ansgar (ftp)]
> 3 July[Ansgar (ftp), Sebastian (release), Paul (release)]
> 10 July [Steve (CD) MAYBE , Ansgar (ftp), Paul (release)]
> 17 July [Steve (CD), press, Ansgar (ftp), Paul (release)]
> 24 July [St
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi Shengjing,
On 06-06-2021 08:36, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 6, 2021 at 11:46 AM Paul Gevers wrote:
>> On 05-06-2021 13:57, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
>>> Please unblock package golang-1.15
Unblocked.
>> You&#
Hi all,
On 06-06-2021 20:03, Paul Gevers wrote:
> With the availability of Adam now known (and some off-list info), we have:
>
> 26 June
> [Ansgar (ftp), Sebastian (release), Adam (release)]
> 3 July
> [Ansgar (ftp), Paul (release), Adam (release)]
> 10 July
> [S
Hi all again,
On 07-06-2021 23:08, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-06-07 at 20:38 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> Nevermind 10 July. Steve, you can stop contemplating about it. We'll
>> go for 24 July as the *tentative* release date.
>
> Unfortunately I've just
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi
On Sat, 5 Jun 2021 15:06:31 +0200 Gaetano Guerriero
wrote:
> Please unblock package eyed3
I haven't looked at the diff yet, but...
> Package is not blocked, but it is marked for removal from
> testing on 16 Jun and the auto migration period expires on 22 Jun.
I ha
Hi Adam,
On 30-05-2021 22:06, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On Sun, 2 May 2021 20:23:30 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
>> [ Reason ]
>> It used to be enough to declare the liferea custom scheme as local to
>> access resources with a file scheme, but for WebKit2Gtk >= 2.32 it looks
&g
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Dear Otto,
On 06-06-2021 03:47, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> Please unblock package galera-4 to fix MariaDB upgrade as reported in #988089.
I appreciate a fix for that bug, but did you really have to do that by
uploading a new upstream release too? How is the new upstream r
Hi Ralf,
On 03-06-2021 13:00, Ralf Jung wrote:
>> Changing compat levels is no longer acceptable for bullseye. Please
>> revert.
>
> Ah, that's a bummer. I was not aware of this policy, sorry for that.
> Doing a revert upload sounds like a lot of hassle though that this
> package is probably not
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Jonathan,
On Sun, 6 Jun 2021 15:56:50 -0700 Jonathan Nieder
wrote:
> [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
I hope for you you didn't go over all changes line-by-line:
1089 files changed, 151811 insertions(+), 82910 deletions(-)
You're debdiff was so larg
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Hi Yadd,
On Thu, 20 May 2021 11:29:15 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
> Control: tag -1 confirmed moreinfo
>
> Hi Yadd,
>
> On 08-05-2021 13:30, Yadd wrote:
> > [ Reason ]
> > Buster to Bullseye transition needs a real node-acorn package (#98613
Hi kibi,
On 20-05-2021 17:55, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> If that's fine for the release team, I'd be happy to have the package in
> unstable so that can be tested via daily builds of the installer (they
> pull udebs from unstable). I'm not sure how much testing those daily
> builds get from people r
Hi Utkarsh
On 06-06-2021 06:14, Paul Gevers wrote:
> I am hoping it's possible to just downgrade the *dependency* in rails
> only, such that the upload can happen via unstable. There is no "direct
> bullseye" route. Or do you expect you'll have to make (lots) of ch
Hi,
On 10-06-2021 19:25, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> If you ACK this, I intend to 0-day NMU this to experimental because it
> needs NEW processing. Please prod the ftp-masters to get this actually done.
We don't have control over ftp-masters *and* I still need some days
before I can actually look p
s shown as seconds with
+fractions (Closes: #989064)
+
+ -- Paul Gevers Fri, 25 Jun 2021 20:59:54 +0200
+
curl (7.74.0-1.2) unstable; urgency=medium
* Non-maintainer upload.
diff -Nru
curl-7.74.0/debian/patches/fix-regression-microseconds-instead-of-seconds.patch
curl-7.74.0/debian/p
Hi Jonathan,
On 13-06-2021 22:32, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Jun 2021 15:56:50 -0700 Jonathan Nieder
> wrote:
>> [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
>
> I hope for you you didn't go over all changes line-by-line:
> 1089 files changed, 151811 inse
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Andreas,
First off, a huge thanks for the enormous amount of QA work you're
doing. It's truly great. Please don't take this reply as a "no", I
really just wish to discuss my concerns in the open.
On 10-06-2021 19:25, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> mono packaging contains
Hi Rick,
Thanks for caring.
On 27-06-2021 22:26, Rick Lell wrote:
> image.png
This list is no bug tracker. Please follow the instructions [1] to file
a bug report.
Paul
[1] https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: reassign -2 release-notes
Control: retitle -2 rdiff-backup protocol changed incompatible
Control: close -1
Hi Samuel,
On 27-06-2021 23:05, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Please unblock package rdiff-backup
unblocked.
> rdiff-backup is a sort of rsync-like backup tool. It
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi Andreas,
On 28-06-2021 19:47, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Control: tag -1 moreinfo
I guess you missed a minus here :) Serves me now, so leaving it.
> Attached is also the latest version of my proposed patch,
> I'm trying to upload this to experimental/NEW tonight.
O
Hi Andreas,
On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 14:50:39 +0200 Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> This has not been discussed with the libgc maintainers (nor does there
> exist a bug, yet).
There is: https://bugs.debian.org/988963 with a solution (in buster).
> I still think reusing 'libgc1' was a very bad decision (ma
Hi,
On 30-06-2021 21:53, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 30/06/2021 21.38, Paul Gevers wrote:
> In case there is no further buster point release before bullseye, the
> fix could be pushed to buster-updates s.t. it is available for the
> oldstable-upgrade before the dist-upgrade, at l
ack upstream to drop non-free and unused file (Closes: #988717)
+ * Build and ship documentation (Closes: #799334)
+
+ -- Paul Gevers Sat, 26 Jun 2021 19:40:37 +0200
+
lxml (4.6.3-1) unstable; urgency=high
* New upstream version.
diff -Nru lxml-4.6.3/debian/control lxml-4.6.3+dfsg/debian/co
Hi Andreas, Laszlo,
On 01-07-2021 08:27, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
>
> let's start a discussion here and once we found a package to upgrade,
> turn this into an unblock request.
And let's add the fuse and fuse3 maintainer to the discussion.
> sshfs
Hi,
On 01-07-2021 10:03, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Related issue:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=918984
Right, I forgot about that bug. The issue and "solution" is documented
in the release notes. @Andreas, can you confirm that the text there is
sufficient for the issues you exp
Hi,
On 23-06-2021 19:58, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> Please unblock package aoetools (as of 36-5)
unblocked.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
On 25-06-2021 01:12, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> Please unblock package pyyaml
unblocked.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Control: tags -1 confirmed d-i
Hi,
On 01-07-2021 14:02, Colin Watson wrote:
> Please unblock grub2 2.04-19. This fixes unbootability problems after
> certain kinds of grub-install failure, which I think constituted an
> important-severity bug at the very least. I did this by resyncing the
> gru
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
On Fri, 2 Jul 2021 01:12:41 +0200 Gennaro Oliva
wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package slurm-wlm
510 files changed, 6706 insertions(+), 5099 deletions(-
Control: tags -1 d-i
Hi
On 03-07-2021 07:17, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> [ Other info ]
> Builds an udeb and needs a d-i hint as well.
So, let's make kibi aware of this too (via boot).
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi all,
On 04-07-2021 00:42, Colin Watson wrote:
> Sorry for my delay - it took me a while to spot the problem. libc6's
> postinst does arrange to restart services where needed, but in this case
> it doesn't realize that you have the ssh service installed because you
> only have the openssh-serve
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Hi Sebastian,
On 04-07-2021 22:01, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>> diff -Nru lxml-4.6.3/debian/control lxml-4.6.3+dfsg/debian/control
>> --- lxml-4.6.3/debian/control2020-12-07 14:42:24.0 +0100
>> +++ lxml-4.6.3+dfsg/debian/control 2021-06-26 19:40:37.00
Hi Jonathan,
On 26-06-2021 22:24, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Ping...
Ping again.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
On 06-07-2021 13:03, Gennaro Oliva wrote:
>>> [X] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
>>
>> All 6000 lines?
>
> I had a quick review to the relevant changes contained in the attached
> patch.
I'm confused. This line doesn't sound like this is appropriate material
for an unblock. We w
Hi Nicolas,
Disclaimer: I haven't looked at the content of your proposed changes at
all yet.
On 04-07-2021 14:21, Nicolas Mora wrote:
> Would you accept a new package in unstable, maybe with a high urgency?
>
> I can also wait for bullseye release and push the new package in
> proposed-updates?
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
Hi Aaron,
On 06-07-2021 04:23, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> [ Introduction / Reason ]
> I would like to issue a new ncbi-entrez-direct upload (patch attached)
> adjusting two wrapper scripts to account fully for their wrappees'
> repertoire of options, or at minimum
Hi,
On 08-07-2021 21:06, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> I should be able to upload around 22:00 UTC. (Also, I take it you're OK
> with the full version, since you didn't indicate otherwise.) Thanks much!
Yes.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Jelmer,
On 11-07-2021 19:44, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> Can I upload a small fix for lintian-brush to testing-proposed-updates to
> allow
> it to remain in testing? I just found out an old FTBFS bug is still affecting
> it in testing, and there's a much newer version in unstable.
That's not why
Hi all,
On 08-06-2021 21:30, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 08:50:55PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> 31 July: ** tentative ** release date
>
> Cool, works for me. Pencilled into my calendar now. :-)
With less than three weeks to go until the tentative release dat
ebian/changelog 2021-04-27 20:27:39.0 +0200
+++ liferea-1.13.5/debian/changelog 2021-07-11 21:37:39.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+liferea (1.13.5-3) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ [ Frédéric Brière ]
+ * Add 0001-Fix-crash-on-selecting-news-bins.patch (Closes: #990911)
+
+ -- Pa
Hi Jelmer,
On 11-07-2021 21:47, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> It's going to be tricky to get this resolved in time before the removal of
> lintian-brush from testing.
Can you elaborate why it's tricky (not promising anything, but there
could be reasons for t-p-u)? The current autoremoval is scheduled
Control: tags -1 confirmed d-i
Hi Steve,
On 11-07-2021 12:21, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Please unblock package udpkg
unblocked
> I've added locking for the status file, so parallel udpkg invocations
> will not break the world. This fixes #987368. We definitely want this
> fix for Bullseye. I'
Control: tags -1 d-i
Hi,
On 10-07-2021 22:15, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi release team, hi Cyril (specifically for d-i)
So, let's add him (via d-boot) in.
> Please unblock package linux
>
> It contained a rebase of the 5.10.y series to 5.10.46 upstream and
> included the following changes
Hi,
On 12-07-2021 01:20, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 11, 2021 at 09:58:30PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> On 11-07-2021 21:47, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
>>> It's going to be tricky to get this resolved in time before the removal of
>>> lintian-brush from test
Hi Hideki, Sebastian,
On 20-06-2021 16:02, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>> --- squid-deb-proxy-0.8.15/debian/squid-deb-proxy.install2020-01-10
>> 19:02:40.0 +0900
>> +++ squid-deb-proxy-0.8.15+nmu1/debian/squid-deb-proxy.install
>> 2021-06-14 23:40:21.0 +0900
>> @@ -1,3 +1
Hi,
On 12-07-2021 18:45, Michael Biebl wrote:
> This was already discussed in
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=959022
>
> My takeaway from that discussion was, that rdeps of cgroup-tools, would
> itself have to be made cgroupv2 aware, especially OpenStack and its
> components.
Hi all,
On 11-07-2021 21:11, Paul Gevers wrote:
> With less than three weeks to go until the tentative release date, I
> would love to confirm the date by now, but there is a serious issue with
> crucial infrastructure (cdbuilder.d.o). Apart from this issue (and what
> it means for
Hi all,
Current overview to check if I got things right and to hopefully trigger
more replies. We currently don't have any day yet with all involved
teams comfortably present, the one coming closest is 4 September.
Somebody from ftp available on 14 august?
14 August (day before DebCamp)
R
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
On 20-07-2021 00:29, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
>> Still not promising anything, but what would be the proposed change in
>> t-p-u?
> Please find attached the proposed change. Please note that it only
> affects the testsuite.
That last note was what I was hoping fo
Hi Salvatore,
On 20-07-2021 20:05, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> We do not have yet the signed packages that said, but once present
> ideally the package get's aged as well to have fixes asap in bullseye.
As asked on IRC: IIUC it's best to wait until all binaries are in and
migrate the set right?
Control: tags -1 confirmed d-i
Hi Aurelien,
On 21-07-2021 22:31, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Please unblock package glibc
Thanks, waiting for the ACK from kibi.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Jelmer,
On 21-07-2021 00:24, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> Done, thanks. Hopefully this looks alright.
The diff of the package in tpu doesn't look like the one I ACKed.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi all,
Thanks to the reply from Ansgar, we now have a release date for
bullseye: 14 August. For the avoidance of doubt, this is *not* a
tentative date anymore. I'll do a proper announcement later today or
tomorrow evening.
14 August (day before DebCamp)
RT: Adam
Image: Steve, And
Hi Cyril,
On 24-07-2021 09:05, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> @RT: I'd be happy to have some feedback from your regarding this
> approach; telling people to enable contrib/non-free so that they
> can install firmware packages is definitely *not* something I take
> lightly, but I'd be happ
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 20-07-2021 21:46, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 10:06:37PM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote:
>> On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 at 13:00, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
>>> Attached is the diff. Changes are the upstream bugfix, as well as two
>>> commits in the
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
Hi Simon,
On 26-07-2021 10:54, Simon McVittie wrote:
> unblock flatpak/1.10.2-3
As we're getting very close to the release, the upload needs to happen
soon. If it does, let's have this. Please remove the moreinfo tag once
the upload happened.
Paul
OpenPGP_
Hi Emmanuel,
On 30-07-2021 14:41, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Please unblock openjdk-11, the next openjdk-11 security release. That could be
> done as a security update as well, the unblock would just avoid that extra
> work.
>
> The only packaging change is to mark the early-access version in the D
Hi,
On 01-08-2021 16:02, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> I've just uploaded openjdk-11-jre-dcevm/11.0.12+7-1 which fixes the issue.
>
> Should I file an unblock request?
Yes, please. Please elaborate on the items I asked last time a bit too,
like how the source is literately the same (and if not, how no
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Alberto,
On 27-07-2021 15:57, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> Please unblock package wpewebkit
wpewebkit is blocked behind wpebackend-fdo which was NACK'ed already due
to build system changes. Can the upload be done in such a way that that
dependency doesn't show up? Can wpe
Control: tag -1 d-i confirmed
Hi Cyril,
On 28-07-2021 12:40, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Please unblock package bind9-libs
>
> * Add patch from Jorge Niedbalski to stop redundant DHCP servers
> from crashing. (Closes: #968298)
>
> isc-dhcp is only user of the bind9-libs libraries.
>
> This patc
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
Hi Salvatore,
On 02-08-2021 22:19, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Upstream added in 5.13-rc4 a new kconfig know to diable unprivilged
> bpf by default, but without making it irreversible. I cherry-picked
> this commit as well, and set BPF_UNPRIV_DEFAULT_OFF, clo
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi
On 02-08-2021 23:00, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package galera-4
>
> It's a new upstream bugfix release, Otto can probably comment on
Control: tags -1 confirmed d-i
Hi Cyril,
The item below needs your ack.
Paul
On 03-08-2021 10:54, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
> Please unblock package libx11
>
> [ Reason ]
> The new upstream release fixes regressions in the previous CVE release,
> including a segfault in fdesign. (bug 990998)
>
>
Hi,
On 05-08-2021 20:23, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Stig,
>
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 07:33:39PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>>
>> On 20-07-2021 21:46, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 10:06:37PM +0200,
Hi Christopher,
On 02-08-2021 13:33, Christoph Martin wrote:
> Please unblock package libapache2-mod-auth-openidc
>
> currently the version 2.4.4.1-2 of libapache2-mod-auth-openidc is in
> testing/bullseye . Some days ago four CVE security bugs were published
> which are fixed in version 2.4.9 .
Hi Georg,
On 06-08-2021 11:07, Georg Faerber wrote:
>
> On 21-08-06 08:32:20, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> It's too late for changes like this one.
>
> Is this due to mat2 being a key package?
That's part of the equation, yes.
> Besides, would this potentially accep
Hi Shengjing,
On 06-08-2021 22:01, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> Should we fix it before the bullseye release?
No, at least not in 11.0.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Control: retitle -1 enable per-package timeout exceptions
Control: severity -1 wishlist
Control: tags -1 =
Hi debci co-maintainers,
On Mon, 21 Sep 2020 11:43:06 +0200 Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 9/19/20 9:16 PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > Source: openjdk-15
> > Version: 15+36-1
> &
Control: reassign -1 debci
Control: retitle -1 trunkate huge logs at the start instead of the end
Hi,
On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 20:35:11 +0100 Paul Gevers wrote:
> reassign -1 debci
Oops.
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On 12-02-2021 10:54, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Package: release.debian
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
Hi Matteo,
On 17-08-2021 23:08, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
> Following advice/request from fellow DD elbrus, I'm filing this
> transition bug report to track down the one-package transition of
> opensubdiv library.
Thanks.
> The only reverse dependency for osd
Hi,
On 22-08-2021 14:58, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> The alternative is to read the release notes and upgrade openssh-server
> before upgrading the full system.
That would be this paragraph:
https://www.debian.org/releases/bullseye/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.en.html#ssh-not-available
It woul
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: britney
I'm filing this bug to remind myself (and others) that britney never
cleans up its autopkgtest-results.cache file. Today I used an
out-of-band script to reduce the file a bit (from 529M to 5
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 991811 = pu
tags 991811 = buster
reopen 991811
retitle 991811 buster-pu:package libapache2-mod-auth-openidc/2.4.9-1~deb10u1
(pre-approval)
thanks
Hi Christoph,
On 24-08-2021 13:10, Christoph Martin wrote:
> @Release Team: What do you recommend?
Hi Andreas,
On 26-08-2021 07:45, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Dylan,
>
> On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 01:17:29PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 10:01:21AM +0200, Dylan Aïssi wrote:
>>>
>>> The transition tracker is on at
>>> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/r-
Hi Thinker,
On 26-08-2021 18:37, thin...@riseup.net wrote:
> 您好，
>
> 請問 Debian 11 的少兒編程軟體會跟進官方網站進行更新嗎？從 Debian 9 開始
> 關注，至今似乎沒看到最新版本的釋出。
>
> 謝謝！
Google translate made this out of it:
"""
Hello,
Will the children's programming software of Debian 11 follow the
official website for updates? Since
Hi Antonio, Thomas,
On 27-08-2021 21:58, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> One thing that happens when you do this type of change without
> coordination is that all CI pipelines on unstable where rabbitmq-server
> is installed are now broken. For example all merge requests against
> debci at the moment ha
Hi,
Sorry my previous message was weird.
On 27-08-2021 22:11, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 27-08-2021 21:58, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
>> One thing that happens when you do this type of change without
>> coordination is that all CI pipelines on unstable where rabbitmq-server
>>
Hi
On 30-08-2021 21:34, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> britney (testing migration software) used to be a bit too liberal on
> letting things migrate, andthere were packages migrating to testing
> despite a binary-all FTBFS (sometimes noone notices for months when a
> -doc package is missing).
That would b
Hi Christoph,
On 31-08-2021 14:30, Christoph Sarnowski wrote:
> Hello Release-Mailinglist,
Our mailing list doesn't work well for plain mail as the amount of (bug)
traffic is very high. A bug report works better to avoid it failing
through the cracks.
> I stumbled upon this "bug" using di-netboo
Hi,
On 31-08-2021 22:10, Christoph Sarnowski wrote:
> Thanks for your reply! I will give it a little more time, then use
> "reportbug debian-installer" to report it. I wasn't sure if reporting on
> the netboot image should go that way, as it is not part of an
> installable debian package.
Sorry,
Hi Andreas,
On 02-09-2021 13:12, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I did added an info about all those packages of level 1 that are failing
> either due to RUnit or testthat issues and here is a manually edited
> `grep -A8 '/jobs/' r-bioc-*/debian/changelog` on my local disk:
>
> r-bioc-biocparallel/debian/
1 - 100 of 1548 matches
Mail list logo
