Control: tags -1 wontfix
Dirk Eddelbuettel:
>
> On 9 September 2017 at 01:31, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> | On 2017-09-08 22:49, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | > I still maintain that this is a useless "academic" consideration. If
> users
> | > want to corrupt their systems by only upgrading one pa
Dirk Eddelbuettel:
>
> On 10 September 2017 at 11:20, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> | On 09/09/17 13:48, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | >
> | > On 9 September 2017 at 06:44, Niels Thykier wrote:
> | > | Thanks to Sébastien and Andreas for explaining the issue
Dirk Eddelbuettel:
>
> On 10 September 2017 at 16:15, Niels Thykier wrote:
> [...]> |
> Next April they will have r-api-4.
Ok. If the r-api-4 bump in April works like I think it does, then that
will also resolve this problem as a side-effect. So in worst case, we
can do a regula
Paul Gevers:
> Hi Niels,
>
Hi
> I am (slowly) progressing through my britney2 changes for autopkgtest
> support. I have incorporated the Ubuntu implementation on the Debian
> britney2 stack and have fixed the regression tests that Ubuntu provided,
> at least those that I think should remain work
Paul Gevers:
> Hi Niels,
>
Hi,
> On 12-09-17 22:15, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Paul Gevers:
>>> - adjust britney2 to not block on autopkgtest failure but instead adjust
>>> the required age depending on the results (lower for pass, raise for
>>> regression
Søren Resbo:
> Hi
>
> Could you please remove me from this mailinglist?
>
> Thank you
>
> Best regards, Søren
>
>
> Venlig hilsen
> Søren Resbo
> It-medarbejder
>
> [...]
>
>
> -Oprindelig meddelelse-
> Fra: Cédric Boutillier [mailto:bou...@debian.org]
> Sendt: 7. oktober 2017 17:1
Daniel Lewart:
> Debian Release managers,
>
> According to the Sep 27, 2017 #debian-release meeting:
>
> http://meetbot.debian.net/debian-release/2017/debian-release.2017-09-27-19.00.html
> there was supposed to be a meeting Oct 25, 2017.
>
> If it occurred, could the information be post
Niels Thykier:
> [...]
>
> To my knowledge, this meeting is cancelled without replacement and the
> next meeting will be:
>
> * 2017-11-22 19:00 UTC
>
> @Attendees: Please note that if you are in a location that observes
> Daylight Saving Time (DST) at the moment, th
es mentioned in the release announcement of stretch.
https://lists.debian.org/debian-announce/2017/msg3.html
From c537f0554f56bfad5bce54e03b61f037bb245e3a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Niels Thykier
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 21:09:23 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Move PolicyVerdict to britney
Pirate Praveen:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package ruby-mobile-fu
>
> This package was depending on rails which also installed many development
> packages not useful in a production system.
Andreas Tille:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package libbpp-seq-omics
>
>
> libbpp-seq-omics (2.4.1-3) unstable; urgency=medium
>
> * Rebuild for new version of gcc to fix symbols
> Cl
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
>
> I have detected an ugly bug in ros-catkin (#924395). It _only_ affects to
> software that uses catkin and generates pkgconfig files (.pc) that uses
> Boost.
>
> In our case we have ros-rosco
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Andre Bianchi:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: rm
>
> Dear Release Team,
>
> Delta Chat upstream team doesn't want the package to go into next stable
> (Buster) because the Delta Chat Core API i
micah anderson:
> Control tags -1 - moreinfo
>
> Hi,
>
> Niels Thykier writes:
>
>> I am adding the Debian maintainer of Delta Chat in Debian as:
>>
>> * I do not know anything about Delta Chat nor its situation outside of
>>Debian. In Debian, i
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Andreas Tille:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package netlib-java
>
Hi,
>
> [...]
> +@@ -658,7 +661,14 @@ class JavaGenerator {
> + //
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
Simon McVittie:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> I would like to follow the 1.2.x stable-branch of flatpak in buster for
> as long as it's maintained upstream, similar to wha
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Douglas Kosovic:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package network-manager-l2tp
>
> I'm the current upstream maintainer of Networkmanager-l2tp and the Debian
> package m
Ansgar Burchardt:
> Steve McIntyre writes:
>> Please unblock package fwupdate
>
> Please also unblock
>
> fwupdate-amd64-signed/12+4
> fwupdate-arm64-signed/12+4
> fwupdate-armhf-signed/12+4
> fwupdate-i386-signed/12+4
>
> at the same time.
>
> Ansgar
>
Unblocked, thanks.
~Niels
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
Scott Kitterman:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package postfix
>
> About the time we were switching to postfix 3.4 in Buster there were a series
> of bug r
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Gregor Jasny:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
>
> Hello,
>
> the v4l-utils version in testing (1.16.3) contains some serious bugs:
> * A double free in libdvbv5
> * Uninitialized memory
> * A FTBFS Bug for Ubuntu ARM architectures (Qt OpenGL ES vs. Desk
Justin B Rye:
> Paul Gevers wrote:
>> Dear all,
>
> (I'm dropping just debian-i18n)
>
> [...]
>> * l10n-english could do a review of the current text of all chapters,
>> keeping in mind that especially the issues.dbk file will keep receiving
>> updates during the releasing process, so the other f
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Scott Kitterman:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package postfix
>
> [...]
> Thanks,
>
> Scott K
>
> unblock postfix/3.4.5-1
>
Please go ahead with the u
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Ferenc Wágner:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package opensaml
>
> Dear Release Team,
>
> [...]
>
> If you're fine with this, I'm ready to upload opensaml
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
Ferenc Wágner:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package kronosnet
>
> Dear Release Team,
>
> The latest upstream release of kronosnet fixes a use-after-free
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Andreas Tille:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package pbgenomicconsensus
>
>
> I admit the changes are more complex than I would have prefered them to
> be. The usa
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
Robert Luberda:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please approve sysstat 12.0.3, which is upstream bugfix release,
> for uploading to unstable and migrating to testing.
>
>
Thorsten Alteholz:
> Hi Reinhard,
>
> On Tue, 2 Apr 2019, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> Now about 6 weeks have passed since I've been uploading this package, and
>> I do have a question: Is there anything wrong with this package?
>
> yes, you did an upload to unstable. At this time of the freeze and
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
(X-CC'ed kibi + debian-boot).
Hi kibi/d-i,
The recent upload of busybox fixes the bug #925979 in busybox-udeb.
Should we (RT) unblock it now or do you prefer waiting (as I
understand it t
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Alf Gaida:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package fswatch
>
> Reason: Symbols reworked after compiler change.
> Additional bumped Standards and switched to debhelper-
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Ondrej Koblizek:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package python-fakeredis
>
> I would like to upload stable update of python-fakeredis (1.0.3) to sid which
>
Control: tags -1 d-i confirmed
Salvatore Bonaccorso:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Hi,
>
> Please unblock package wget
>
> It fixes CVE-2019-5953, #926389 a buffer overflow vulnerability in the
> handling
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Ian Jackson:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package chiark-utils
>
> chiark-utils is a portmanteau of different utiliies. I am proposing
> to fix two bugs.
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Nicolas Braud-Santoni:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package yubikey-personalization
>
> In version 1.19.3-1, I introduced a bug w.r.t. udev rules handling
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Gregor Jasny:
> Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
>
> Hello,
>
> A new patch turned up and I decided to only cherry-pick the three most
> important patches from the stable-1.16 tree.
>
> Debdiff is attached.
>
> If you agree on the changes I will upload via unstab
Hi Security team and backports team,
According to the release team's checklist we have the following TODO for
you:
"""
Check with security team and backports team that it is possible to build
uploads for -security and -backports
"""
To our knowledge, the relevant suites have already been created
Control: tags -1 d-i confirmed
Andrej Shadura:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock the package wpa.
>
> This upload fixes a security vulnerability in WPA3-Personal and EAP (#926801):
>
> - CVE-20
Control: tags -1 confirmed d-i
Colin Watson:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock parted 3.2-25: there was an arithmetic error in its
> handling of extended partitions, which was often in practice ma
Control: tags -1 moreinfo cionfirmed
Daniele Tricoli:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Hello!
>
> This is a pre-approval to unblock package debiancontributors 0.7.8-1
>
> debiancontributors is a package used
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Arnaud Rebillout:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package docker.io.
>
> unblock docker.io/18.09.1+dfsg1-5+b10
>
> I'd like to fix #925224 [1] for buster. T
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
intrigeri:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package gnome-shell.
>
> Changes are:
>
> 1. Vcs-Git, gbp.conf: point to the correct, Buster-specific, branches.
>
> 2. Av
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Alberto Molina Coballes:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package arptables
>
> A serious bug was opened on ebtables and arptables regarding an issue
> with u
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Alberto Molina Coballes:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package ebtables
>
> A serious bug was opened on ebtables and arptables regarding an issue
> with us
Control: tags -1 confirmed d-i
Colin Watson:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock openssh 1:7.9p1-10; as discussed recently on
> debian-devel, this reverts an upstream change in 7.8 that causes
> pro
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Andreas Tille:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package bitlbee
>
>
> * Non-maintainer upload.
> * Apply patch to d/copyright provided by Jochen Sprickerhof
>
>
Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo
Boyuan Yang:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> X-Debbugs-CC: bi...@debian.org pkg-utopia-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
>
> This is a pre-approval for NMU that would fix ht
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Hubert Chathi:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
>
> Hello release team.
>
> I would like to upload a new version of nheko to fix #926671. It is an
> "important" bug (though in reality, it could be argued that it is
> "serious", as Matrix will
On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 07:54:00 + Niels Thykier wrote:
> Control: tags -1 d-i confirmed
>
> Salvatore Bonaccorso:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: unblock
> >
>
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
James Lu:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Dear Release Team,
>
> Please consider unblocking variety 0.7.1-2. I've backported a couple of
> fixes from the newest upstream ve
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i confirmed
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
I am filing an unblock for alsa-utils as it has a fixed RC bug and
needs a d-i ack.
alsa-utils (1.1.8-2) unstable; urgency=medium
* Introduce Fix-alsactl-to-rest
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i confirmed
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
I am filing an unblock for bind9 as it has a fixed RC bug and
needs a d-i ack.
bind9 (1:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-3) unstable; urgency=medium
* More fixes to the AppArmor p
ture over keyrings/debian-archive-keyring.gpg
[ Niels Thykier ]
* Add myself as uploader (Closes: #927765)
-- Niels Thykier Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:42:28 +0200
"""
A diffstat:
"""
$ diffstat debian-archive-keyring.debdiff
active-keys/add-buster-automatic
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Steve McIntyre:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package shim-signed
>
> We've just got new signatures back from Microsoft to match our shim
> binaries for amd64, i386
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Mike Gabriel:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package x2gobroker
>
> [...]
>
> light+love,
> Mike
>
> unblock x2gobroker/0.0.4.1-1
>
> [...]
Please go ahe
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Markus Koschany:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package lucene-solr
>
> I made a mistake when I installed solr-permissions.conf into the wrong
> /etc/systemd/system/
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Boyuan Yang:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-gnome-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> 927...@bugs.debian.org
>
> Hello all,
>
> I have prepared an NMU to
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Mo Zhou:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package utf8proc
>
> (explain the reason for the unblock here)
>
> I'm astonished that the unicode (11.* -> 12.*) transition
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Unit 193:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Howdy,
>
> Pending approval, I'm uploading a version of gcalcli which contains an
> upstream patch to fix the reliance on the Goo
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Andreas Tille:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package htslib
>
>
> [...]
>
>
> unblock htslib/1.9-11
>
> [...]
Hi,
Please file a bug against ftp.debian.org reque
Control: tags -1 moreinfo confirmed
Mo Zhou:
> Hi,
>
> Here are some incremental updates to 2.3.0-1 following the last mail:
>
> + * Patch: update unicode-data version strings to 12.1.0
>
> Upstream code hard-coded unicode-data version in the code. I need to
> patch those string literals.
>
>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Tags: newcomer
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: britney
Wishlist item:
Currently a d-i freeze involves blacklisting packages with
udebs. However, Britney should have enough information to determine
which packages have udebs and
Uwe Kleine-König:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: britney
>
> Hello,
>
> a few days ago (i.e. before libupnp migrated to testing) I saw on
> tracker.d.o:
>
> Updating libupnp fixes old bugs: ...
>
> I wondered wha
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
We should update the freeze policy for buster.
The bug is 1) a reminder of this fact and 2) a reminder of some
concrete improval suggestions:
* Remove references to priority extra (e.g. "priority: optional or extra")
* Add a reference to the li
Hi,
I have written a branch that replaces most of our ad-hoc log framework
with the standard python3 logging framework. The branch is available from:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/users/nthykier/britney.git/log/?h=rewrite-logging
The only notable difference is that the timestamp format change
Adam D. Barratt:
> On Sat, 2018-03-24 at 09:57 +0000, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> I have written a branch that replaces most of our ad-hoc log
>> framework
>> with the standard python3 logging framework. The branch is available
>> from:
>>
>> https://anonscm.deb
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
At the moment, "Please read wanna-build[1]" is a canned answer
from Debian contributors when people ask about how to request binNMUs.
However, sometimes people think that they need to request binNMUs for
packages involved in transitions and they migh
Paul Gevers:
> Dear release team,
>
> Since Dec 2016⁰ I have been working together with multiple people
> (including nthykier) to prepare the integration of britney with
> autopkgtest results. We believe the work has reached a state where full
> deployment can be considered. Let me describe how it
Paul Gevers:
> Dear release team,
>
> Since Dec 2016⁰ I have been working together with multiple people
> (including nthykier) to prepare the integration of britney with
> autopkgtest results. We believe the work has reached a state where full
> deployment can be considered. Let me describe how it
Niels Thykier:
> Paul Gevers:
>> Dear release team,
>>
>> Since Dec 2016⁰ I have been working together with multiple people
>> (including nthykier) to prepare the integration of britney with
>> autopkgtest results. We believe the work has reached a state where ful
Paul Wise:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: britney
>
> In #898329, pochu had to clarify the meaning of "Valid Candidate":
>
>Just to clarify things: being a valid candidate means britney will
>try to migrate that
Paul Wise:
> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 1:53 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>
>> """
>> Migration status: OK: Will attempt migration (Any information below is
>> purely informational)
>> """
>
> I'd remove the "OK:" fro
Control: tags -1 patch
Paul Wise:
> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 2:46 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>
>> When I wrote the messages, I wanted to quickly high light the three
>> basic states ("OK", "WAITING" or "BLOCKED"/rejected). The first two
>> s
# https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/ReleaseCheckList
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usercategory buster-sort
* Codename [tag=]
+ Blockers for Codename [buster-is-blocker]
+ Planned for removal [buster-will-remove]
+ Ignored for Codename [buster-can-defer]
thanks
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usercategory buster-sort
* Codename [tag=]
+ Blockers for Codename [buster-is-blocker]
+ Planned for removal [buster-will-remove]
+ Ignored for Codename [buster-can-defer]
Russ Allbery:
> Holger Levsen writes:
>
> [...]
>
> Release folks, why this exception in the release policy? Are you
> comfortable with Debian releasing with packages that Recommend packages
> that aren't part of the release? (Have we historically done this?)
>
Hi,
Thanks for the questions.
Hi,
I noticed that apex and nis are currently testing despite the
auto-remover wanting to remove them (#865585 and #862778). At the
moment, they are (only) retained due to a constraint that ensures that
d-i's packages are all present and installable.
Please have a look at these packages and let
Hi,
I noticed that nslu2-utils was removed from unstable (#869430) in August
2017, but at the moment we have a constraint to keep it in testing for d-i.
Please let us know when we can drop this constraint and let britney
remove nslu2-utils from testing.
Thanks,
~Niels
Jonathan Nieder:
> Hi,
>
> [...]
>
Hi Jonathan,
Just replying to part of your enquiry
> With severity=high, a security fix then takes two more days before it
> hits testing. Is there a way to expedite it? My experience with
> https://bugs.debian.org/871823 was "no".
>
> Is my understanding
Jonathan Nieder:
> Hi Niels,
>
> Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Jonathan Nieder:
>
>>> With severity=high, a security fix then takes two more days before it
>>> hits testing. Is there a way to expedite it? My experience with
>>> https://bugs.debian.o
Ian Jackson:
> Adam D. Barratt writes ("Bug#831699: release.debian.org: urgency is sticky
> across dists - low urgency on sid upload ignored"):
>> On 2018-06-20 15:55, Ian Jackson wrote:
>>> What I don't understand is why it is not correct for britney to use
>>> the urgency of the actual version i
Ian Jackson:
> Now that we have autopkgtests blocking testing migration, there is a
> much stronger incentive for people to keep their tests passing in
> testing.
>
s/blocking/delaying/
While it is a goal to get it to a blocking state, we are not there yet.
> If one's tests are broken by an upd
in
time for inclusion in buster.
On behalf of the release team,
Niels Thykier
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Breno Leitao:
> Hi Niels,
>
> On 06/27/2018 05:03 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>
>> List of concerns for architectures
>> ==
>>
>> The following is a summary from the current architecture qualification
>> table.
>>
>&
Source: debbugs
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
Please add "bookworm" and "bookworm-ignore" release related bug tags to
support/prepare for buster+2.
Thanks,
~Niels
Moritz Mühlenhoff:
> Niels Thykier wrote:
>> If the issues and concerns from you or your team are not up to date,
>> then please follow up to this email (keeping debian-release@l.d.o and
>> debian-ports@l.d.o in CC to ensure both parties are notified).
>
> Two issu
Chow Loong Jin:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Hi,
>
> There was an ABI break without soname bump in libtinyxml2-6 recently[1],
> and I've renamed the package to libtinyxml2-6a as a consequence.
>
> Unfor
Control: tags -1 pending
Marcin Kulisz:
> Due to lack of Breaks+Replaces it will require additional upload with those
> options added to fix #905146.
>
> Please let me know if I should upload it or wait.
>
> Tho as Bas mentioned earlier package version meant to trigger transition is
> already in
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer:
> Control: block 902263 by 904133
>
> Hi! Please note that this is the only package stopping the Qt transition now.
>
Hi Lisandro,
Could you please confirm that the autopkgtest regression for
ktexteditor (marked on the excuses for qtbase-opensource-src) is b
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Ralf Treinen:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> nmu dose3_5.0.1-11 . ANY . buster . -m "recompile against camlzip 1.07"
>
> This should fix #905016.
>
> [...]
Hi Ralf,
Usually, binNM
Pino Toscano:
> In data lunedì 30 luglio 2018 07:25:08 CEST, Pino Toscano ha scritto:
>> In data sabato 28 luglio 2018 10:16:15 CEST, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ha
>> scritto:
>>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>>>
>>> On 15/07/18 22:33, Pino Toscano wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity:
Subject: asd
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: britney
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: elb...@debian.org
Hi,
Britney crashed with the following error:
Cron Daemon:
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/srv/release.debian.org/britney/code/
Niels Thykier:
> Chow Loong Jin:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: transition
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> There was an ABI break without soname bump in libtinyxml2-6 recently[1],
&
Chow Loong Jin:
> [...]
>
> Hi,
>
> Both ignition-common and sdpb properly pick up the correct dependency
> when built with sbuild on my machine, while kido simply FTBFS.
>
> Looking at the timestamps on the build logs, it looks like the binNMUs
> didn't happen.
>
> [...]
Indeed; binNMU'ing ign
On Sat, 7 Jul 2018 19:17:11 +0200 (CEST) Santiago Vila
wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear Release Managers:
>
Hi Santiago,
Thanks for working on QA in testing.
> I'm looking for guidance and advice here.
>
> I'm reporting FTBFS bugs in testing, but I'm skippin
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Aurelien Jarno:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> Hi release team,
>
> One of the goal of the glibc team for buster is to get rid of the
> multiarch-support package, given that multiarc
Aurelien Jarno:
> [...]
>>
>> Hi Aurelien,
>>
>> If the goal is to make testing free of packages (Pre-)Depending on
>> multiarch-support
>
> Yes, that's exactly the goal, that way we can just stop building the
> package in the next upload. There are still a few depending packages
> in sid/experime
On 2015-08-24 13:58, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Montag, den 24.08.2015, 13:55 +0200 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
>> On 24/08/15 13:37, Joachim Breitner wrote:
>>> from my understanding, the current Haskell packages in unstable
>>> should
>>> be able to migrate to testing. At least my
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Control: submitter -1 prein...@logic.at
X-Debbugs-CC: Norbert Preining
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-tex-ma...@lists.debian.org
X-Debbugs-CC: Osamu Aoki
Hi,
Thanks for the suggestion. :)
On 2015-08-25 10:43, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
> Hello,
>
> with #796323 a updated version of Icedove was uploaded to t-p-u.
> Depended on the GCC5 transition and it's migration progress some blocks
> coming along with this also to the current version of Icedove in
> unstable. So the version in tes
Hi,
Thanks to Adam, Julien, Jonathan, Matthias, Scott, Simon and many
others, we are ready to migrate the bulk of the GCC-5 transition and
related sub-transitions to testing tonight. Apologise for the short notice.
We expect this to be *mostly* a smooth ride, but there are some caveats:
* We w
On 2015-09-05 21:25, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [...]
> We expect this to be *mostly* a smooth ride, but there are some caveats:
>
> * We will have to remove some packages from testing temporarily
>
> * A total of 36 (amd64) / 31 (i386) binary packages will beco
401 - 500 of 1565 matches
Mail list logo
