Breno Leitao: > Hi Niels, > > On 06/27/2018 05:03 PM, Niels Thykier wrote: > >> List of concerns for architectures >> ================================== >> >> The following is a summary from the current architecture qualification >> table. >> >> * Concern for ppc64el and s390x: we are dependent on sponsors for >> hardware. >> (Raised by DSA; carried over from stretch) >> >> * Concern for armel and armhf: only secondary upstream support in GCC >> (Raised by the GCC maintainer; carried over from stretch) >> >> * Concern for mips, mips64el, mipsel and ppc64el: no upstream support >> in GCC >> (Raised by the GCC maintainer; carried over from stretch) > > I am not sure if ppc64el should be here. GCC does have a good ppc64el support > and this is being maintained by some IBM folks. > > Can you elaborate a bit more on this concern for ppc64el? >
Hi, That was a mistake by my part. Matthias already mentioned that ppc64el was not a concern and I see I only removed the first but not the second reference. Apologies for the confusion. Thanks, ~Niels
