On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 11:44:35AM +, Simon Huggins wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 04:01:37PM +0000, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 03:48:49PM +, Simon Huggins wrote:
> > > I've been trying to get time to upload this fix lately. There are quit
--- liferea-1.4.18/debian/changelog
+++ liferea-1.4.18/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+liferea (1.4.18-1.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Disable webkit plugin as it's not releasing with lenny
+
+ -- Neil McGovern Sun, 04 Jan 2009 14:44:35 +
+
liferea (1
On Sat, Jan 03, 2009 at 10:59:18PM +, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> This fixes #510628 which blocks #503532 so uploaded at high.
>
Unblocked by luk.
Neil
--
I miss a computer physically... I can ping it, but don't know where
it is...
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 12:09:31PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le dimanche 04 janvier 2009 à 18:29 +0000, Neil McGovern a écrit :
> > Browser maintainers: This is RC for lenny. I have NMUs ready which drop
> > the -webkit variants should you want them. Patches attached if you
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 09:36:20AM +0100, Tobias Quathamer wrote:
> please consider to unblock iso-codes/3.5.1-1, as the upload contains just
> translation updates. The changelog is as follows:
>
Unblocked.
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting b
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 06:57:57PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This release fixes a RC bug.
>
Despite the other unrelated changes that weren't mentioned in the
changelog, unblocked.
Neil
--
doesn't the world come to an end if iDunno shaves?
That's how the dinosaurs died
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 06:23:07PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> See the attached patch which fixes #510665 (a normal bug) and along
> the way #496003 (documentation); I'd like to get these into lenny, but
> before uploading to unstable, pre-approval of the upload would be
> nice. [I've already tes
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 06:52:20PM +0100, Luigi Gangitano wrote:
> Hi releasers,
> I would like to ask for allowance of squid_2.7.STABLE3-2 in lenny. This
> release fixes several bugs and a couple o issues with DNS.
>
Unblocked.
Neil
--
<@nurn> Paedophile Glitter arrives in UK
<@nurn> is it me
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 06:54:14PM +0100, Luigi Gangitano wrote:
> Hi releasers,
> I would like to ask for allowance of squid3_3.0.STABLE8-2 in lenny. This
> release fixes a couple of bug and cleans up packaging quality.
>
Unblocked.
Neil
--
10 people enough for a Debconf? If they were all Ge
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 06:56:40PM +0100, Luigi Gangitano wrote:
> Hi releasers,
> I would like to ask for allowance of drupal6_6.6-2 in lenny. This
> release acknowledges NMU from Patrick and fixes a couple of bugs that
> affect druapl6 when installed alongside drupal5 and with postgres
> ba
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 06:58:29PM +0100, Luigi Gangitano wrote:
> Hi releasers,
> I would like to ask for allowance of sarg_2.2.5-2 in lenny. This fixes
> several buffer overflows in sarg and packaging errors.
>
There seems to be a mixture of changes directly to the files, and with a
patch syst
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 10:16:51AM +1100, Mark Purcell wrote:
> Jeremie,
>
> Thanks for the patch. I'll get it included shortly.
>
> I'll also try for inclusion in lenny as IPv6 is a release goal,
> however we are in very deep freeze so I can't make any promises.
>
Please upload, and reping onc
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 02:25:28PM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
> Please unblock isight-firmware-tools 1.2-9.
> The only change is Vietnamese and Japanese debconf templates[0][1].
>
Unblocked.
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
gpg key
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 01:11:08PM +0100, Christian Hammers wrote:
> It has been uploaded and built on all archs but is still in
> testing-proposed-updates. Please unblock!
>
It seems to be missing hppa and s390. When these arrive, we'll notice
and accept it :)
Neil
--
dou you speak frensh ?
-
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 01:44:39AM +0100, Luigi Gangitano wrote:
> There is no patch system in sarg packaging. debian/patches is there just
> to keep track of all the patches that have been applied. I'm going to
> restructure the packaging as soon as lenny is released, but the binary
> packages
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 01:31:10PM +0100, Thomas Lange wrote:
> Please unblock FAI 3.2.16, which fixes a critical bug (#511391) and
> includes some documentation patches.
Unblocked.
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
gpg key - http://www.ha
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 07:39:01PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 10:10:58PM +0000, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > tags 239111 +lenny-ignore
> > tags 243835 +lenny-ignore
> > tags 246111 +lenny-ignore
> > tags 309218 +lenny-ignore
> > tag
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:23:41AM +0100, Robert Luberda wrote:
> Could you please allow manpages-pl/20060617-2 to propagate to testing?
Unblocked.
Neil
--
hermanr_: I never studied german
I can just read some of it because it makes sense
. o O ( There is stuff Ganneff writes, which makes sen
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 11:36:28PM +0100, Tobias Grimm wrote:
> please add a freeze exception to vdr-plugin-remote. It's of priority
> "extra"
> and the version 0.4.0-15 just updates the Swedish debconf translation:
>
Unblocked.
Neil
--
<@nurn> Paedophile Glitter arrives in UK
<@nurn> is it me
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 01:30:34PM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> i intend to upload a version of simple-cdd that works with the recent
> debian-cd
> upload targeted for lenny. a diff of planned changes is attached.
>
Did this upload land in unstable? I can't seem to find it there.
Thanks,
N
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 09:54:19AM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 05:11:28PM +0000, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 01:30:34PM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> > > i intend to upload a version of simple-cdd that works with the recen
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:29:39AM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 04:18:56PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > * Roberto C. Sánchez [Mon, 19 Jan 2009 08:54:31 -0500]:
> >
> > > I just saw [0] that libwx-perl was removed from Lenny. Why? The bug
> > > referenced in the r
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 12:25:28PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> xserver-xorg-video-intel/2:2.3.2-2+lenny6 fixes a regression introduced
> in -2+lenny5. The patch is trivial. Please unblock it.
>
Unblocked.
Neil
--
< linuxpoet> rails is a perversion
< mc> someone who use pgsql as ca
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:27:54AM +, David Watson wrote:
> Could you please unblock pybridge-0.3.0-4, this upload fixes the serious
> bug #512576.
>
Unblocked.
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubke
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 07:10:42PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
> Please unblock slmon. The changes are minor but mainly to remove the
> build-deps on old gnome-libs. Here is the changelog:
>
Unblocked.
Neil
--
dpkg: shut up
No, I won't, and you can't make me. :P
hah. _I_ can
--
To UN
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 07:15:16PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
> Please unblock synce-trayicon. It is a minor change to remove an
> unnecessary build-dep on a gnome-lib. Here is the changelog:
>
Unblocked.
Neil
--
02:14:04 crap. my squirrelmail does not work
02:14:07 Maulkin: ping
--
T
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 07:24:51PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please unblock glotski. It's a small change to remove an unneeded
> build-dep on a gnome-libs binary. Here is the changelog entry:
>
Unblocked.
Neil
--
ETOOMUCHSPANISHTOOFAST
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-relea
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 07:33:03PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
> Please consider unblocking gwc . The number of changes are significant
> but small (Mainly to kill more gnome-lib build-depends). If you would
> like to see a diff, please let me know. Here are the last two changelog
> ent
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 07:42:52PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
> Please consider unblocking mrwtoppm 0.1.1-2.2. Another unnecessary
> gnome-libs build-dep. I did bump compat on this one though. Here is
> the changelog entry:
>
Sorry, I'm not happy with a change to debian/compat at this lat
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 07:46:40PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
> Please unblock ogle-gui 0.9.2-4.2. Another unnecessary build-dep on a
> gnome-lib (and some minor lintian fixes). Here is the changelog:
>
Any idea what:
--- ogle-gui-0.9.2/debian/ogle-gui.desktop
+++ ogle-gui-0.9.2/debian/ogle-
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 07:50:09PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
> Please unblock gnomekiss 2.0-3. Another unnecessary build-dep on an old
> gnome-lib. Here is the changelog:
>
Unblocked.
Neil
--
* toresbe wonders what would happen if Ted Walther and Amaya were put in the
same room
t
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 02:05:15AM +0100, Arnaud Fontaine wrote:
> Could you please unblock twill-0.9 as this upsream version fixes several
> important bugs. Here is the changelog entry:
>
102 files changed, 12933 insertions(+), 12292 deletions(-)
Sorry, we don't have time to review this at thi
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 07:25:29PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Hi release team,
>
> please consider unblocking
>
> network-manager 0.6.6-3
> network-manager-applet 0.6.6-4
> knetworkmanager 1:0.2.2-2
>
You seem to have dropped quilt as a builddep. Any idea why?
Neil
--
* toresbe wonders wha
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 05:05:51PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
> Neil McGovern wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 07:46:40PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
>>
>>> Please unblock ogle-gui 0.9.2-4.2. Another unnecessary build-dep on
>>> a gnome-lib (and some m
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 11:39:19AM +, Marco Rodrigues wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm requesting this, because it's currently not installable on lenny/testing.
> The current version at unstable fixes the problem.
>
mongrel/1.1.5-5 unblocked.
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discus
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:29:29AM +0100, Gonéri Le Bouder wrote:
> Hi Release Team,
>
> Please unblock game-data-packager 19. This release fix a bashism
> in its main script #501173.
>
Same version in testing and unstable (game-data-packager_19.dsc)
Neil.
--
A. Because it breaks the logical s
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 11:29:32PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >> network-manager 0.6.6-3
> >> network-manager-applet 0.6.6-4
> >> knetworkmanager 1:0.2.2-2
> >>
Unblocked.
Neil
--
hermanr_: I never studied german
I can just read some of it because it makes sense
. o O ( There is stuff Gann
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:33:55AM +, Andrew Price wrote:
> I realise there are restrictions on unfreezing packages where there are
> substantial upstream changes. However, the Twitter API has changed
> substantially since twyt 0.8.5 was released and has effectively
> obsoleted 0.8.5.
>
Given
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 04:29:39PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> I strongly recommend current netatalk in unstable to be included in
> Lenny.
>
377 files changed, 61010 insertions(+), 74925 deletions(-)
Sorry, that can't be done at this stage in the freeze.
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks th
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 12:03:18AM +0100, Arnaud Fontaine wrote:
> >>>>> "Neil" == Neil McGovern writes:
> Neil> 102 files changed, 12933 insertions(+), 12292 deletions(-)
> 28 files changed, 600 insertions(+), 227 deletions(-)
>
Could you attacht
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 08:54:48PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> Could you unblock opensaml2 2.0-2 for lenny? The changelog is:
>
> * Include fix for https://bugs.internet2.edu/jira/browse/CPPOST-7
> (Metadata with EncryptionMethod elements fails to load)
> * Include fix
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 01:39:06AM +0100, Arnaud Fontaine wrote:
> diff --exclude='*other_packages*' --exclude='*tests*' -urN
> twill-0.9~b1/debian/changelog twill-0.9/debian/changelog
Unblocked.
Neil
--
hermanr_: I never studied german
I can just read some of it because it makes sense
. o O
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 07:27:06AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Would a one-line change of build-dependencies to fix Bug#512604 be
> accepted?
>
Yes, to T-P-U though. However, isn't this affected by #459459?
> Would any of the other parts, if isolated from that largest change of
> being ac
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 11:36:55PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> It's a simple enough script renaming agreed by upstream to fix an RC bug.
>
Unblocked.
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ; the
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 11:11:00AM +0100, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
> Btw., will squeeze be 6.0?
>
Unknown yet, and probably won't be for some time.
Neil
--
is _that_ gunnar?
yes
what happened to his tires?
He's shrunk. I think his wife washed him at too high a temperature.
--
To UNSUBSCR
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 01:41:14PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> I've just uploaded this, which contains an important documentation fix
> relating to choice of databases which has just come to our attention.
>
Unblocked.
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Wh
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 11:11:50PM +1100, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 08:41:45PM +1100, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> >On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 08:34:22AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> >>Aníbal Monsalve Salazar writes:
> >>>please unblock tau/2.16.4-1.2
> >>
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 07:09:31PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> http://people.debian.org/~naoliv/misc/debian-med/biofox_diff.txt
>
> >* New upstream release, compatible with Firefox 3 (Closes: #512371).
> >* Updated debian/watch.
Both ok.
> >* Use Debhelper 7 (idebian/co{ntrol,mpat
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 07:53:53PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Hi Neil, thanks for your review.
>
> Le Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:45:30AM +0000, Neil McGovern a écrit :
> >
> > > >* Use Debhelper 7 (idebian/co{ntrol,mpat}.
> >
> > Not ok.
>
&
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 08:56:29PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 11:36:54AM +0000, Neil McGovern a écrit :
> > On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 07:53:53PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> >
> > The debhelper change, at this very very late stage in the relea
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 06:28:34AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Please, consider, this is urgent, as there's a security fix in this
> package. Is there any way to skip the 9 days delay?
>
Upload with urgency high?
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top p
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 03:37:24PM +0100, Jérémie Corbier wrote:
> and I would like to be allowed to upload it to t-p-u since wide-dhcpv6-client
> in
> its current state in testing is completely unusable.
>
Please upload.
Neil
--
* stockholm bangs head against budget
outsch
h01ger: it is sti
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 03:21:32PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hello,
>
> from Luk's hints file:
> | # 20081218
> | […]
> | unblock guile-1.6/1.6.8-6.1
>
> please make it: guile-1.6/1.6.8-6.3
>
Unblocked.
Neil
--
[local irc server has just been brought up]
suddenly there's quite some sil
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:07:43PM -0200, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> Version 0.10.8-4.1 fixes a security bug!
Unblocked.
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ; the.earth.li B345BDD3
-
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 04:51:38PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> sshguard is useful to me, and I'd like to see it stay in, but in its
> current state of neglect it's probably not practical. My offer to co-maintain
> still stands, but I doubt a new upstream will make it into lenny at this
> lat
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 10:20:04PM -0200, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 03:55:08PM +0000, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 12:07:43PM -0200, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
> > wrote:
> > > Version 0.10.8-4.1 fixes a security
Hi all,
This is a quick mail to invite those interested to a meeting tonight to
discuss the timetable for the release.
Please note that this is a practial meeting, and due to the tight
timescales we're working towards, topic discipline is appreciated.
Apologies for the short notice.
Neil
--
< M
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 09:14:36AM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> So, please advise.
>
>From a RT point of view, this isn't going to have a fix in for lenny.
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.t
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 10:49:50PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> It appears that shorewall-{common,perl,shell} are in need of hinting in
> order to propogate. I'd appreciate if someone could hint them.
>
easy hint added.
Neil
--
[..] Debian (in the form of a large, busy, and frequently st
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 04:45:14PM -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> Hi!
>
> ImageMagick in Lenny has non-free fonts with it (see bug #510751).
> The proposed update is to upload the current version in testing
Please upload.
Neil
--
irssiproxy appears to be crack cut with washing up powder
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 12:15:59AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> gnome-libs has been removed from unstable. Please remove the two remaining
> packages using it from testing: powershell and soundtracker
> RC bugs are in place so that they can't migrate back before they've been
> fixed.
>
remo
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 11:10:54PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Hi,
> the following source packages have at least one binary package, which
> is now uninstallable, because one or more of it's depencies have been
> removed (GTK 1.2, Imlib1). Please remove them from testing:
>
Hi Moritz,
>Fr
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 10:12:04PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> icewm
> linpopup
> wmclockmon
> cheops
> codebreaker
> gaby
> dbmix
> gcrontab
> gbuffy
> gcvs
> gcx
> geg
> gman
> gps
> gqcam
> gtkpool
> libjsw
> i2e
> mah-jong
> mbrowse
> predict
> xemacs21
> swami
> xoscope
> xscorch
>
Al
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 05:24:32PM +0200, Enrico Tassi wrote:
> I've some packages that seem to be blocked by lua-lpeg/lua-wsapi (ABI
> bump), but after spending some time surfing release.d.o I didn't manage
> to uderstand why they are not moving to testing.
>
Basically, package A breaks package
On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 10:37:11PM +1200, Hamish wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the goes & osm2pgsql packages are now both ready to go into testing
> but they mutually exclude each other from doing so. requesting
> paired-hinting.
>
Added:
# GIS itesm 20090530
easy osm2pgsql/0.52.20080408-3 geos/3.1.0-1
Than
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 05:31:45PM +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
> Could you unblock dmraid/1.0.0.rc15-8 please?
>
Unblocked.
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ; the.earth.li A40F862E
signa
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 12:43:36AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Can openssl 0.9.8k-3 be pushed to testing? It fixed a number
> of security issues.
>
Unblocked.
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt
Hi Arnaud,
I've just rejected your upload to SPU for nut.
We generally cannot accept 58,000 line changes in SPU. Especially
without requesting it on debian-release@lists.debian.org
Additionally, you have added a file, called ":". This seems to be a
copy of debian/changelog.
It also seems to
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 09:48:54PM -0700, Zack Weinberg wrote:
> The botan library snafu has been resolved. It looks like the package
> needs to wait for the latest botan and sqlite, and something weird
> happened on the hppa buildd which I *hope* is not the beginning of
> another horrible round o
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 11:05:05AM -0300, UlisesVitulli wrote:
> I've found a problem which breaks functionality on one of my packages
> and I've prepared a patch to solve it.
> It's really very simply as you may find attached.
>
Hi,
That's fine. Please upload to SPU.
Thanks,
Neil
--
A. Becaus
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 04:25:36PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> When do the release team plan to start publishing approved release
> goals? Any hope of having this done now during debconf?
>
Hi Peter,
Apologies for the delay in replying. There should be a notification to
debian-devel-ann
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 03:45:01PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> Is this patch a valid candidate for inclusion in the next point
> release?
>
Hi Julian,
I'm afraid we can't accept this:
* There's a change to the uploaders (which is a bit useless for a stable
point release)
* We don't real
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 11:40:35PM +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> Please do so nlkt 0.3.2.1-3 fixing FTBFS bug can migrate to testing.
> E-mail to sparc buildd was sent at Jul 18 and received no answer.
>
Hi Eugene,
It seems that this comes back from w-b:
nlkt: has uninstallable build-depen
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:32:20AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> GRUB 2 should be the default bootloader on x86.
>
Hi,
Could you fill in a goal page similar to ones in
http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals?
Thanks,
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top pos
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 11:53:41AM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> As reflected in http://bugs.proftpd.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3284 upstream
> has recently fixed a long standing issue in proftpd which negatively
> impacts its performances. I would be inclined to propose a PU but
> I'd like havin
Hi there,
I've uploaded blootbot/1.2.0-6 with a couple of translation updates, and
a minor change to debian/rules, changing binary to binary-indep and
binary-arch.
Please unblock :)
Thanks,
Neil
--
If stockhom sees my banana, he will want to eat it
signature.asc
Description: Digital signatur
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 03:46:05PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> A couple of mirror changes which will hit the UK over the next couple of
> months.
>
Thanks for the info,
I've forwarded this on to the relevent team.
Cheers,
Neil
--
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 09:01:34PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> * You must be a Debian developer. Please include your name, and
> Debian username on your application. The position will entail
> work that requires login access to Debian machines which is
> only ava
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 11:51:47AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 11:33:01AM +0200, Johannes Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-07-20 at 10:16 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> >
> > > Does any port still need to stick with GCC 4.1 for a while? Feedback
> > > fr
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 08:28:41AM +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
> Hi Stable Debian-Release,
> Hi Security Team,
>
Not speaking in any official capacity here, but:
Lets have a look at the vulnerabilities which still affect etch:
CVE-2007-2022 - "Unspecified vulnerability ... unspecified impact and
On Sat, Sep 01, 2007 at 06:56:42PM +1000, Steffen Joeris wrote:
> Hi
>
> The last polipo upload fixes CVE-2007-4626 and CVE-2007-4625 .
> Do you know how stable the new upstream version is? I would like to get the
> security fixes into testing as soon as possible and I was wondering on your
> ma
On Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 07:51:02PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> Hi,
> I hope I understood Andreas' mail in the right way.
> Please allow fetchmail 6.3.8-8 to enter testing. It is
> currently blocked because of the sparc buildd and is fixing
> a security issue (CVE-2007-4565).
> Kind regards
> Nico
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 12:00:23PM -0200, Margarita Manterola wrote:
>
> Motivation:
> For some time now, one of the things that the Release Team has had to
> deal with are complex transitions. One of the requirements for making a
> transition work is that maintainers of involved packages must no
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 11:35:54AM -0500, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> So please, let these maintainers choose, rather than ordering them
> about. It is *they* who are in a position to decide whether maintaining
> gnome 1.x is worth it. Of course, it will also be up to them to do the
> maintenanc
On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 11:35:05AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Please RM team, could you drop firmware-nonfree from freeze list?
>
Block removed.
Neil
--
Maulkin: there is no html tag (yet? could be
extended like foo -> Ganneff kills foo?) :)
signature.asc
Description: Digital s
On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 02:45:02AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Please consider all packages that builds udebs as frozen. We're
> handling the beta1 releasing and would be better to be conservative
> from now on.
>
They all seem to be marked as blocked already. Are there any you know of
that a
This issue probably qualifies for a stable point update (-release in
cc). I can prepare a package if you want.
Cheers,
Neil
--
Neil McGovern
SQA - Amino Communications
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 03:09:36PM -0200, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> Dear release-team,
>
> We have a new version of ImageMagick settled on experimental and we are
> wanting to upload it to unstable.
>
[snip]
>
> Is there something else that I am missing to say/ask/do? Do we have
> permissio
enny. Its inclusion in the main
> ftp archive is being worked on at the moment.
>
Hi all,
Apologies for the lack of co-ordination here. I (personally) didn't
expect it to hit the archives quite as quick as it did. I'll try and
make sure that -mirror is informed beforehand
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 12:12:48PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hello RM team and Jeroen,
> >
> > RM team, please add a block for etch-support source package and add
> > following hints:
>
> The block for etch-support has not been added. Please
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 02:04:39PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Neil McGovern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 12:12:48PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >> Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> > H
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 04:49:51PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> I hereby ask for a block on linux-2.6 source package until d-i Beta1
> gets out. If it migrates before we do the final images we can need to
> delay d-i release.
>
Block added, but I'd like to stress the urgency of getting beta1 o
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 06:32:25PM -0500, Philippe Cloutier wrote:
> Le February 21, 2008 05:12:09 pm Lucas Nussbaum, vous avez écrit :
> > > OMG, we were talking about migration of Linux 2.6.24 to testing.
> >
> > "we"? Seriously, Philippe. You are not a DD. You are not in NM. You
> > don't (co-)
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 08:25:59PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It would be great if:
>
> (1) a direct link to the list of release goals could be added to
> http://release.debian.org/
>
Done
> (2) the list of release goals was made more easily machine-parseable
>
Done
> (3) the BT
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 08:39:32PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Aníbal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Please unblock pciutils 1:2.2.10-1
> >
> > Otavio/Jérémy please approve this request.
> >
> > Closes: 403181
> > Changes:
> > pciutils (1:2.2.10-1) unstable; urgency=low
>
this has been accepted as a
release goal:
# Transition g77 -> gfortran
Advocate: Kumar Appaiah, Mathias Klose
Release-Team-Contact: Neil McGovern
Description: Make packages build with gfortran as a replacement for g77
Bug-Tag: gfortran
State: confirmed
As the team aren't hugely
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 09:30:44AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> According to http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/lvm2.html>, lvm2 is
> ready to go into testing, but have failed to do so. It depend on
> redhat-cluster, which is also ready to go into testing.
>
easy hint added.
Neil
--
I'
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 12:59:51PM +0100, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> I have got a report about this bug #469293, that is about data corruption
> during a migration function that exist within vzctl.
>
> The fix is simple, but I need to know if it is possible to get this fix
> in the next version (r4) o
On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 01:00:48PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This week we had a report (#469030) of a successful installation on a
> powerpc system, but followed by a failed reboot because D-I had selected the
> wrong kernel.
>
> The fix for that is a trivial one-liner [1] and I'd like to
On Sat, Mar 08, 2008 at 01:03:55PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Aníbal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Please unblock rdate 1:1.1.3-1 (udeb)
> >
> > Otavio/Jérémy please approve this request.
>
> Ack.
>
Unblocked
Neil
--
If stockhom sees my banana, he will want to eat i
101 - 200 of 442 matches
Mail list logo
