On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 07:39:01PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: > On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 10:10:58PM +0000, Neil McGovern wrote: > > tags 239111 +lenny-ignore > > tags 243835 +lenny-ignore > > tags 246111 +lenny-ignore > > tags 309218 +lenny-ignore > > tags 425367 +lenny-ignore > > thanks > > > > The grub + XFS issues are long standing and complicated go fix. This > > means that they're not going to get fixed in time for lenny. Hence > > adding lenny-ignore tags > > Hi Neil, > > As Rob pointed out there's a serious regression, and I plan to fix it really > soon. So please remove the lenny-ignore tag. >
I'll believe it when I see it :) This has been 'fixed' many times, and it seems to be non-trivial. If we *do* end up with a fix, that'll be great; the RC bug gets closed (yay!). If not, I don't want to delay the release over it as we'll be putting it in the release notes (#511440). However, ccing -release so a RM can override my decision if they want. Neil -- A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ; the.earth.li B345BDD3 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
